Identification of validated multibody vehicle models for crash analysis using a hybrid optimization procedure

The design of components, or particular safety devices, for road vehicles often requires that many analyses are performed to appraise different solutions. Multibody approaches for structural crashworthiness provide alternative methodologies to the use of detailed finite element models reducing calculation time by several orders of magnitude while providing results with the necessary quality. The drawbacks on the use of multibody approaches for crashworthiness are the cumbersome model development process and difficulty of model validation. This work proposes an optimization procedure to assist multibody vehicle model development and validation. First the topological structure of the multibody system is devised representing the structural vehicle components and describing the most relevant mechanisms of deformation. The uncertainty in the model development resides on the constitutive behavior of the plastic hinges used to represent the structural deformations of the vehicle, identified by using the classic multibody approach. The constitutive relations are identified by using an optimization procedure based on the minimization of the deviation between the observed response of the vehicle model and a reference response, obtained by experimental testing or using more detailed models of the vehicle. The identification is supported by a genetic optimization algorithm that enables the characterization of several initial sets of parameters that characterize the plastic hinge constitutive relations in the vicinity of an Edgeworth-Pareto front. Afterwards, a deterministic optimization algorithm is used to identify the accurate minimum. The procedure is demonstrated by the identification of the multibody model of a large family car suitable for front impact.

[1]  Mark F. Nelson,et al.  The Application of Optimization Techniques to Problems of Automotive Crashworthiness , 1977 .

[2]  E. Bayo,et al.  Singularity-free augmented Lagrangian algorithms for constrained multibody dynamics , 1994, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[3]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  Advanced design of mechanical systems : from analysis to optimization , 2009 .

[4]  Paulo Veríssimo,et al.  Development of generic multibody road vehicle models for crashworthiness , 2008 .

[5]  Dominique Cesari,et al.  Improvement of crash compatibility between cars , 1998 .

[6]  Javier García de Jalón,et al.  Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems , 1994 .

[7]  R. K. Ursem.  Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[8]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Identification of multibody vehicle models for crash analysis using an optimization methodology , 2010 .

[9]  A. J. G. Schoofs,et al.  Crash worthiness design optimization using multipoint sequential linear programming , 1996 .

[10]  H. G. Mooi,et al.  AN OPTIMIZATION METHODOLOGY FOR IMPROVING CAR-TO-CAR COMPATIBILITY , 2000 .

[11]  Ji Oh Song.  An optimization method for crashworthiness design , 1986 .

[12]  J. Ambrósio,et al.  Stabilization Methods for the Integration of DAE in the Presence of Redundant Constraints , 2003 .

[13]  Lothar Wech,et al.  Automotive Safety Handbook , 2003 .

[14]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems , 1988 .

[15]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Multibody Systems Handbook , 2012 .

[16]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[17]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  Parallel Evolutionary Optimization of Multibody Systems with Application to Railway Dynamics , 2003 .

[18]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  An Augmented Formulation for Mechanical Systems with Non-Generalized Coordinates: Application to Rigid Body Contact Problems , 2001 .

[19]  ChangHwan Kim,et al.  Development of simplified models for design and optimization of automotive structures for crashworthiness , 2001 .

[20]  J. Baumgarte.  Stabilization of constraints and integrals of motion in dynamical systems , 1972 .

[21]  Gyung-Jin Park,et al.  Automotive Occupant Dynamics Optimization , 1995 .

[22]  Manuel S. Pereira,et al.  Distributed and discrete nonlinear deformations on multibody dynamics , 1996 .

[23]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.

[24]  E. Haug,et al.  Generalized Coordinate Partitioning for Dimension Reduction in Analysis of Constrained Dynamic Systems , 1982 .

[25]  Parviz E. Nikravesh,et al.  Plastic hinge approach to vehicle crash simulation , 1983 .

[26]  Claus B. W. Pedersen,et al.  Topology optimization design of crushed 2D-frames for desired energy absorption history , 2003 .

[27]  Javier García de Jalón,et al.  Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: The Real Time Challenge , 1994 .

[28]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Design of train crash experimental tests by optimization procedures , 2004 .

[29]  Y. Censor.  Pareto optimality in multiobjective problems , 1977 .

[30]  R. Lust,et al.  Structural optimization with crashworthiness constraints , 1992 .

[31]  J. P. Dias,et al.  Optimization methods for crashworthiness design using multibody models , 2004 .

[32]  Paul Lemmen,et al.  Evaluation of fleet systems model for vehicle compatibility , 2005 .

[33]  José G. Dias,et al.  A road vehicle multibody model for crash simulation based on the plastic hinges approach to structural deformations , 2007 .

[34]  E. J. Haug,et al.  Computer aided kinematics and dynamics of mechanical systems. Vol. 1: basic methods , 1989 .

[35]  E. Polak,et al.  Constrained minimization under vector-valued criteria in finite dimensional spaces☆ , 1967 .

[36]  Jorge A. C. Ambrosio.  Crashworthiness : energy management and occupant protection , 2001 .