Characteristics of locational uncertainty marginal price for correlated uncertainties of variable renewable generation and demands

Abstract With the rapid increase of variable renewable energy sources in power systems, how to manage and price the uncertainty of renewable resources’ power outputs is becoming an urgent issue. Current market designs considering the uncertainties are mainly based on the probabilistic scenario set of demand and renewable energy resources power outputs. This consideration makes market designs vulnerable to three significant challenges when put into practice. First, the accurate probability distribution of renewable generation is hard to obtain in real-time. Second, it is challenging to clear the market timely with many scenarios to guarantee accuracy. Third, generation cost recovery cannot be guaranteed for some scenarios. To overcome these challenges, this paper proposes a locational uncertainty marginal price model to price the uncertainty explicitly based on a scenario-free stochastic market-clearing model. Instead of using the probabilistic scenario set, the uncertainty of renewable energy sources and loads is modeled with distributionally-robust chance constraints. The correlation of uncertainties can be endogenously modeled in both the market-clearing and the locational uncertainty marginal price formation. Furthermore, this paper proves that generation cost recovery, revenue adequacy, and partial market equilibrium can be achieved using the locational uncertainty marginal price model. Numerical results from both the small and large systems simulations validate that the generation cost recovery is maintained no matter the generation participates in uncertainty mitigation or not. The transmission congestion surplus is also allocated appropriately among loads, renewable energy sources, and financial transmission right owners.

[1]  Adria E. Brooks,et al.  The validity of a locational marginal price on variable power injections in energy and regulation markets , 2020 .

[2]  Bowen Li,et al.  Chance Constrained Reserve Scheduling Using Uncertain Controllable Loads Part I: Formulation and Scenario-Based Analysis , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Göran Andersson,et al.  Chance-Constrained AC Optimal Power Flow: Reformulations and Efficient Algorithms , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Kjetil T. Midthun,et al.  Stochastic Electricity Dispatch: A Challenge for Market Design , 2016 .

[5]  Feng Qian,et al.  Large-scale industrial energy systems optimization under uncertainty: A data-driven robust optimization approach , 2020 .

[6]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  Decentralized wind uncertainty management: Alternating direction method of multipliers based distributionally-robust chance constrained optimal power flow , 2019, Applied Energy.

[7]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Market coupling and the importance of price coordination between power exchanges , 2009 .

[8]  M. Nazif Faqiry,et al.  Distribution locational marginal price-based transactive day-ahead market with variable renewable generation , 2020 .

[9]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  Introducing Uncertainty Components in Locational Marginal Prices for Pricing Wind Power and Load Uncertainties , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Evaluation of LMP Intervals Considering Wind Uncertainty , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Electricity market clearing with improved scheduling of stochastic production , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Long Zhao,et al.  Solving two-stage robust optimization problems using a column-and-constraint generation method , 2013, Oper. Res. Lett..

[13]  G. Calafiore,et al.  On Distributionally Robust Chance-Constrained Linear Programs , 2006 .

[14]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Small test systems for power system economic studies , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[15]  Chongqing Kang,et al.  A Nash-Cournot approach to assessing flexible ramping products , 2017 .

[16]  Tohid Khalili,et al.  A fair electricity market strategy for energy management and reliability enhancement of islanded multi-microgrids , 2020 .

[17]  Miles Lubin,et al.  A Robust Approach to Chance Constrained Optimal Power Flow With Renewable Generation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  Deliverable Flexible Ramping Products Considering Spatiotemporal Correlation of Wind Generation and Demand Uncertainties , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Probabilistic solar power forecasting based on weather scenario generation , 2020, Applied Energy.

[20]  Sue Ellen Haupt,et al.  Solar Forecasting: Methods, Challenges, and Performance , 2015, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[21]  Fangxing Li,et al.  Continuous Locational Marginal Pricing (CLMP) , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[22]  Jin Zhong,et al.  Pricing Electricity in Pools With Wind Producers , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  G. Strbac,et al.  Pricing inertia and Frequency Response with diverse dynamics in a Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming formulation , 2019 .

[24]  Ruiwei Jiang,et al.  Ambiguous Chance-Constrained Binary Programs under Mean-Covariance Information , 2016, SIAM J. Optim..

[25]  J. Rosellón,et al.  Financial transmission rights: Analysis, experiences and prospects , 2013 .

[26]  K. Poplavskaya,et al.  Effect of market design on strategic bidding behavior: Model-based analysis of European electricity balancing markets , 2020, Applied Energy.

[27]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  A Stochastic Market Design With Revenue Adequacy and Cost Recovery by Scenario: Benefits and Costs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  Modelling wind power spatial-temporal correlation in multi-interval optimal power flow: A sparse correlation matrix approach , 2018, Applied Energy.

[29]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Determining the Peer-to-Peer electricity trading price and strategy for energy prosumers and consumers within a microgrid , 2020 .

[30]  Conrad Edwards,et al.  Alternative loss model for the New Zealand electricity market using SFT , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[31]  Fangxing Li,et al.  DCOPF-Based LMP simulation: algorithm, comparison with ACOPF, and sensitivity , 2007, 2008 IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition.

[32]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  Uncertainty Marginal Price, Transmission Reserve, and Day-Ahead Market Clearing With Robust Unit Commitment , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[33]  J. Fuller,et al.  Pricing Energy and Reserves Using Stochastic Optimization in an Alternative Electricity Market , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[34]  Pierre Pinson,et al.  Incentive-Compatibility in a Two-Stage Stochastic Electricity Market With High Wind Power Penetration , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[35]  J. Price Market-Based Price Differentials in Zonal and LMP Market Designs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[36]  Rabih A. Jabr,et al.  Adjustable Robust OPF With Renewable Energy Sources , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[37]  James D. McCalley,et al.  Risk-Based Locational Marginal Pricing and Congestion Management , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.