Integration of self assessment with a change management process for deploying concurrent engineering : executive summary

The main research theme of this engineering doctorate was as follows: 'How can UK industry effectively leverage concurrent engineering practices within the organisation?' To address this problem, a review of implementation tools was undertaken, where a number of 'do it yourself' methodologies were identified within the literature for implementing Concurrent Engineering (CE). These were 'change management workbooks' and 'self-assessment tools'. Change management workbooks provide a means for managing an implementation program, and self-assessment measures and benchmarks the deployment of practices and identifying areas for improvement. However, both were found to operate independently from one another. Therefore, it has been proposed that the deployment of CE practice can be further enhanced through an integrated approach. This approach combines both disciplines, because as a system it could measure the deployment of practices, identify future improvements, and enable an organisation to manage the transition to better CE. To solve this problem a self-assessment tool, which encapsulated practice from the automobile, power generation, aerospace, pneumatics and mechatronics industry sectors was developed. The tool consisted of both a practice and performance dimension to ensure that practices deployed impacted the bottom line. The selfassessment tool allows for a company to assess its current state, and decide where it wants to go. Furthermore, a change management process was developed, which integrated with the self-assessment tool, and a series of additional tools developed specifically for the task such as the generic planning tool, a decision tool for deciding an implementation strategy, and additional tools, which have been selected from the literature. The application of the system at an UK based organisation demonstrated that a self-assessment tool integrated with a change management process can assist a facilitator to direct a change program toward implementing CE practice. Furthermore, the preliminary results of this application illustrate that the practices deployed as a result of the system were impacting key project performance measures.

[1]  B Burnes Managing Change (2nd Edition) , 1996 .

[2]  ASAR,et al.  Integrating total quality management and business process re-engineering : is it enough ? , 2001 .

[3]  Christopher E. Bogan,et al.  Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through Innovative Adaptation , 1994 .

[4]  Erastos Filos,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Projects Supported by the European Commission's ESPRIT Programme and Future Trends , 2001, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[5]  Francis Stickland,et al.  The Dynamics of Change: Insights into Organisational Transition from the Natural World , 1998 .

[6]  John Mortimer,et al.  Simultaneous engineering : the management guide , 1990 .

[7]  W. Deming Out of the crisis : quality, productivity and competitive position , 1986 .

[8]  D. Hatherly,et al.  Principles of External Auditing , 1997 .

[9]  P. Coughlan,et al.  Development of a technical innovation audit , 1996 .

[10]  S. C. Hitchins Software tools for the product development process , 1994 .

[11]  C. O'Neal Concurrent Engineering with Early Supplier Involvement: A CrossFunctional Challenge , 1993 .

[12]  Brent Work,et al.  Doing research in Business and Management: An Introduction to process and method , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  P. J. Veness,et al.  Concurrent engineering infrastructure. Tools, technologies and methods in British industry , 1996 .

[14]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time , 1995 .

[15]  Kevin Neailey,et al.  A comparative study of six stage‐gate approaches to product development , 1999 .

[16]  Dianne Waddell,et al.  Organisational Development and Change , 2003 .

[17]  Tony Grundy Implementing Strategic Change: A Practical Guide for Business. , 1994 .

[18]  Samuel J. Keene Concurrent engineering for better product development , 1992 .

[19]  H. Caroline Daniels,et al.  Information Technology: The Management Challenge , 1993 .

[20]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[21]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  4 Product development performance: strategy, organization and management in the world auto industry☆ , 1994 .

[22]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[23]  Peter Jackson,et al.  Managing a quality system using BS/EN/ISO 9000 (formerly BS 5750) , 1995 .

[24]  Charles Tennant,et al.  Deployment of a company wide quality strategy in the automotive business : executive summary , 1998 .

[25]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[26]  James A. Swaney,et al.  Comparative Risk Analysis: Limitations and Opportunities , 1996 .