An Evaluation of Mitigation Measures to Reduce Impacts of Peat Harvesting on the Aquatic Habitat of the East Branch Portage River, New Brunswick, Canada

The evaluation of impacts of peat harvesting on riverine ecosystems is essential to the implementation of adequate mitigation measures. The objective of the present study was to determine the potential impacts of peat harvesting on the physical (e.g., flow, suspended sediment concentration (SSC), water temperature) and biological (fish abundance) parameters of the East Branch Portage River, New Brunswick. This study was initiated in 2005 and a before and after study design was used to assess impacts. When the operational activities were initiated (spring 2007), 19 ha of peatland (15% of the total area scheduled for harvesting) was drained. The exploited area was drained through a network of ditches which emptied into a sedimentation pond. Drained water subsequently flowed into a 250 m vegetated buffer zone and discharged into the East Branch Portage River. Drained water did not diffuse throughout the buffer zone as expected. Rather, water tended to concentrate in a natural depression (channel) in the buffer zone, thus connecting the outflow of the sedimentation pond directly to the river. Two main results deserve attention. First, elevated SSC events were recorded in the East Branch Portage River downstream of the confluence of the channel formed in the buffer zone and the river. Periods of elevated SSC could be attributed to poor maintenance of the sedimentation pond. However, elevated SSC events were also recorded after pond maintenance and were concurrent with the timing of ditching activities within the peatland. Secondly, fish abundance was lower in 2007 compared to 2006 (pre-development period). However, potential impacts of peatland development on fish abundance should be interpreted with caution at this stage of the study.

[1]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems , 1973 .

[2]  J. Coulson,et al.  The effect of open drainage ditches on the plant and invertebrate communities of moorland and on the decomposition of peat , 1990 .

[3]  K. Minkkinen,et al.  Long-term effect of forest drainage on the peat carbon stores of pine mires in Finland , 1998 .

[4]  A. St‐Hilaire,et al.  Impact of peat moss released by a commercial harvesting operation into an estuarine environment on the sand shrimp Crangon septemspinosa , 2006 .

[5]  A. Rousseau,et al.  Implementation of a Peatland-Specific Water Budget Algorithm in HYDROTEL , 2009 .

[6]  C. Newcombe,et al.  Channel Suspended Sediment and Fisheries: A Synthesis for Quantitative Assessment of Risk and Impact , 1996 .

[7]  D. Caissie The thermal regime of rivers : a review , 2006 .

[8]  J. Price,et al.  Characterization of surface storage and runoff patterns following peatland restoration, Quebec, Canada , 2006 .

[9]  J. Price,et al.  Towards a conceptual model of hydrological change on an abandoned cutover bog, Quebec , 2002 .

[10]  Paul K. Barten,et al.  The peatland hydrologic impact model: development and testing. , 1987 .

[11]  J. Arnold,et al.  SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling , 2005 .

[12]  J. Daigle,et al.  CANADIAN PEAT HARVESTING AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 2002 .

[13]  J. Hayes,et al.  Estimating relative abundance of juvenile brown trout in rivers by underwater census and electrofishing , 1994 .

[14]  B. Kløve,et al.  Erosion and delivery of deposited peat sediment , 2008 .

[15]  Yves Tramblay RÉGIONALISATION DES CONCENTRATIONS EXTRÊMES DE SÉDIMENTS EN SUSPENSION DANS LES RIVIÈRES D'AMÉRIQUE DU NORD , 2008 .

[16]  T. Ouarda,et al.  Exploratory study of suspended sediment concentrations downstream of harvested peat bogs , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[17]  T. Ouarda,et al.  Suspended Sediment Concentrations Downstream of a Harvested Peat Bog: Analysis and Preliminary Modelling of Exceedances Using Logistic Regression , 2006 .