Ex Vivo and In Vivo Evaluation of Overexpressed VLA-4 in Multiple Myeloma Using LLP2A Imaging Agents

Very-late-antigen-4 (VLA-4, α4β1 integrin, CD49d/CD29) is a transmembrane adhesion receptor that plays an important role in cancer and immune responses. Enhanced VLA-4 expression has been observed in multiple myeloma (MM) cells and surrounding stroma. VLA-4 conformational activation has been associated with MM pathogenesis. VLA-4 is a promising MM imaging and therapeutic biomarker. Methods: Specificity of 64Cu-LLP2A (64Cu-CB-TE1A1P-PEG4-LLP2A), a high-affinity VLA-4 peptidomimetic–based radiopharmaceutical, was evaluated in α4 knock-out mice and by competitive blocking in wild-type tumor-bearing mice. 64Cu-LLP2A PET/CT (static and dynamic) imaging was conducted in C57BL6/KaLwRij mice bearing murine 5TGM1-GFP syngeneic tumors generated after intravenous injection via the tail. Blood samples were collected for serum protein electrophoresis. Bone marrow and splenic cells extracted from tumor-bearing and control mice (n = 3/group) were coincubated with the optical analog LLP2A-Cy5 and mouse B220, CD4, Gr1, and Mac1 antibodies and analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Human radiation dose estimates for 64Cu-LLP2A were extrapolated from mouse biodistribution data (6 time points, 0.78 MBq/animal, n = 4/group). Ten formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded bone marrow samples from deceased MM patients were stained with LLP2A-Cy5. Results: 64Cu-LLP2A and LLP2A-Cy5 demonstrated high specificity for VLA-4–positive mouse 5TGM1-GFP myeloma and nonmalignant inflammatory host cells such as T cells and myeloid/monocytic cells. Ex vivo flow cytometric analysis supported a direct effect of myeloma on increased VLA-4 expression in host hematopoietic microenvironmental elements. SUVs and the number of medullar lesions detected by 64Cu-LLP2A PET corresponded with increased monoclonal (M) protein (g/dL) in tumor-bearing mice over time (3.29 ± 0.58 at week 0 and 9.97 ± 1.52 at week 3). Dynamic PET with 64Cu-LLP2A and 18F-FDG demonstrated comparable SUV in the prominent lesions in the femur. Human radiation dose estimates indicated urinary bladder wall as the dose-limiting organ (0.200 mGy/MBq), whereas the dose to the red marrow was 0.006 mGy/MBq. The effective dose was estimated to be 0.017 mSv/MBq. Seven of the ten human samples displayed a high proportion of cells intensely labeled with LLP2A-Cy5 probe. Conclusion: 64Cu-LLP2A and LLP2A-Cy5 demonstrated binding specificity for VLA-4 in an immune-competent murine MM model. 64Cu-LLP2A displayed favorable dosimetry for human studies and is a potential imaging candidate for overexpressed VLA-4.

[1]  Jason S. Lewis,et al.  Dosimetry of 60/61/62/64Cu-ATSM: a hypoxia imaging agent for PET , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  Otto S Hoekstra,et al.  18F‐fluoro‐deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in assessment of myeloma‐related bone disease: A systematic review , 2012, Cancer.

[3]  T. Horie,et al.  Expression of β1 Integrins (Very Late Antigens-4 and −5) on Myeloma Cells and Clinical Correlates in Patients with Multiple Myeloma , 1998 .

[4]  P. L. Bergsagel,et al.  Multiple myeloma: increasing evidence for a multistep transformation process. , 1998, Blood.

[5]  K. Anderson,et al.  Adhesion of human myeloma-derived cell lines to bone marrow stromal cells stimulates interleukin-6 secretion. , 1993, Blood.

[6]  C. Rüegg,et al.  Manganese-induced integrin affinity maturation promotes recruitment of αVβ3 integrin to focal adhesions in endothelial cells: evidence for a role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Src , 2004, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[7]  A. Masumoto,et al.  Multiple activation states of VLA-4. Mechanistic differences between adhesion to CS1/fibronectin and to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  F. Sanz‐Rodríguez,et al.  VLA-4-Dependent Myeloma Cell Adhesion , 2001, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[9]  Carolyn J. Anderson,et al.  Very Late Antigen-4 (α4β1 Integrin) Targeted PET Imaging of Multiple Myeloma , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  G. Pinkus,et al.  The development of a model for the homing of multiple myeloma cells to human bone marrow. , 1997, Blood.

[11]  P. L. Bergsagel,et al.  Molecular pathogenesis of multiple myeloma and its premalignant precursor. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[12]  G. Bendas,et al.  Contribution of very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) integrin to cancer progression and metastasis , 2015, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[13]  Kit S Lam,et al.  Combinatorial chemistry identifies high-affinity peptidomimetics against alpha4beta1 integrin for in vivo tumor imaging. , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[14]  M. Tomasson,et al.  Small Molecule MYC Inhibitor Conjugated to Integrin-Targeted Nanoparticles Extends Survival in a Mouse Model of Disseminated Multiple Myeloma , 2015, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[15]  R. Vij,et al.  The characteristics and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma dual refractory or intolerant to bortezomib and lenalidomide in the era of carfilzomib and pomalidomide , 2014, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[16]  L. Pilarski,et al.  Adhesion of multiple myeloma peripheral blood B cells to bone marrow fibroblasts: a requirement for CD44 and alpha4beta7. , 1997, Cancer research.

[17]  H. Taylor,et al.  HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[18]  A. Hidalgo,et al.  Chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha modulates VLA-4 integrin-mediated multiple myeloma cell adhesion to CS-1/fibronectin and VCAM-1. , 2001, Blood.

[19]  A. Rosenwald,et al.  The microenvironment in mature B-cell malignancies: a target for new treatment strategies. , 2009, Blood.

[20]  K. Anderson,et al.  The 86-kD subunit of Ku autoantigen mediates homotypic and heterotypic adhesion of multiple myeloma cells. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  J. Dipersio,et al.  Mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using inhibitors of CXCR4 and VLA-4 , 2012, Leukemia.

[22]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Multiple myeloma, version 1.2013. , 2013, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[23]  Hans Erik Johnsen,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  K. Thielemans,et al.  Organ involvement and phenotypic adhesion profile of 5T2 and 5T33 myeloma cells in the C57BL/KaLwRij mouse. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[25]  A. Chirindel,et al.  Characterizing and Predicting Pathologic Spine Fractures in Myeloma Patients With FDG PET/CT and MR Imaging , 2011, Cancer investigation.

[26]  K. Anderson,et al.  Characterization of adhesion molecules on human myeloma cell lines. , 1992, Blood.

[27]  C. Anderson,et al.  PET Imaging of Very Late Antigen-4 in Melanoma: Comparison of 68Ga- and 64Cu-Labeled NODAGA and CB-TE1A1P-LLP2A Conjugates , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  G. Mundy,et al.  Bone marrow stromal cells create a permissive microenvironment for myeloma development: a new stromal role for Wnt inhibitor Dkk1. , 2012, Cancer research.

[29]  Kit S. Lam,et al.  In vivo optical imaging of human lymphoma xenograft using a library-derived peptidomimetic against α4β1 integrin , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[30]  G. Mundy,et al.  Osteoclasts in Multiple Myeloma Are Derived from Gr-1+CD11b+Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  T. Papayannopoulou,et al.  Sustained alterations in biodistribution of stem/progenitor cells in Tie2Cre+ alpha4(f/f) mice are hematopoietic cell autonomous. , 2007, Blood.