Efficient strong Unified Formulation for stress analysis of non-prismatic beam structures

Abstract The Unified Formulation (UF) has gained attention as a powerful tool for efficient design of structural components. Due to the inherent flexibility of its kinematics representation, arbitrary shape functions can be selected in different dimensions to achieve a high-fidelity characterisation of structural response under load. Despite this merit, the classical isoparametric description of UF limits the application to prismatic structures. The weak-form anisoparametric approach adopted to overcome this limitation in a recent work by Patni [1] proves to be versatile yet computationally challenging owing to the expensive computation of its UF stiffness matrix by means of full volume integrals. We propose a strong-form anisoparametric UF (SUF) based on the Serendipity Lagrange Expansion (SLE) cross-sectional finite element and differential quadrature beam element. The main objective of the SUF is to achieve an efficient computation of the UF stiffness matrix by restricting Gauss operations to the variable cross-sections of non-prismatic structures in a discrete sense, thus eliminating the need for full volume integrals. When assessed against weak-form based UF, ABAQUS FE and analytical solutions, the static analysis of non-prismatic beam-like structures under different loads by the SUF is shown to be accurate, numerically stable, and computationally more efficient than state-of-the-art methods.

[1]  M. Petrolo,et al.  Accurate evaluation of failure indices of composite layered structures via various FE models , 2018, Composites Science and Technology.

[2]  P. Weaver,et al.  Comparison of weak and strong formulations for 3D stress predictions of composite beam structures , 2019 .

[3]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Efficient modelling of beam-like structures with general non-prismatic, curved geometry , 2020, Computers & Structures.

[4]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Planar Timoshenko-like model for multilayer non-prismatic beams , 2018 .

[5]  Sid Ahmed Meftah,et al.  Analytical solutions attempt for lateral torsional buckling of doubly symmetric web-tapered I-beams , 2013 .

[6]  P. Weaver,et al.  A generalized nonlinear strong Unified Formulation for large deflection analysis of composite beam structures , 2020, AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum.

[7]  Reza Attarnejad,et al.  Derivation of an Efficient Non-Prismatic Thin Curved Beam Element Using Basic Displacement Functions , 2012 .

[8]  E. Carrera,et al.  Analysis of tapered composite structures using a refined beam theory , 2018 .

[9]  J. D. Yau,et al.  Stability of Beams with Tapered I‐Sections , 1987 .

[10]  J. Reddy A Simple Higher-Order Theory for Laminated Composite Plates , 1984 .

[11]  P. Weaver,et al.  Stress analysis of generally asymmetric non-prismatic beams subject to arbitrary loads , 2021 .

[12]  Alfonso Pagani,et al.  Exact solutions for free vibration analysis of laminated, box and sandwich beams by refined layer-wise theory , 2017 .

[13]  Wei-bin Yuan,et al.  Lateral-torsional buckling of steel web tapered tee-section cantilevers , 2013 .

[14]  Luan C. Trinh,et al.  Inverse differential quadrature method: mathematical formulation and error analysis , 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society A.

[15]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Large-deflection and post-buckling analyses of laminated composite beams by Carrera Unified Formulation , 2017 .

[16]  C. Franciosi,et al.  Exact and approximate dynamic analysis of circular arches using DQM , 2000 .

[17]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Stress and strain recovery for the in-plane deformation of an isotropic tapered strip-beam , 2010 .

[18]  F. Tornabene,et al.  Strong and weak formulations based on differential and integral quadrature methods for the free vibration analysis of composite plates and shells: Convergence and accuracy , 2017, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements.

[19]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  Three-dimensional stress analysis for beam-like structures using Serendipity Lagrange shape functions , 2018, International Journal of Solids and Structures.

[20]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Applications of higher order corotational stretch theories to nonlinear finite element analysis , 1979 .

[21]  3D static analysis of patched composite laminates using a multidomain differential quadrature method , 2019 .

[22]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Micromechanical Progressive Failure Analysis of Fiber-Reinforced Composite Using Refined Beam Models , 2017 .

[23]  Charles W. Bert,et al.  Differential quadrature analysis of deflection, buckling, and free vibration of beams and rectangular plates , 1993 .

[24]  Charles W. Bert,et al.  Free Vibration of Plates by the High Accuracy Quadrature Element Method , 1997 .

[25]  Michel Géradin,et al.  Finite element theory for curved and twisted beams based on exact solutions for three-dimensional solids. Part 1: Beam concept and geometrically exact nonlinear formulation , 1998 .

[26]  Chang-New Chen,et al.  DQEM analysis of in-plane vibration of curved beam structures , 2005, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[27]  R. Bellman,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL QUADRATURE: A TECHNIQUE FOR THE RAPID SOLUTION OF NONLINEAR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1972 .

[28]  Gaetano Giunta,et al.  A modern and compact way to formulate classical and advanced beam theories , 2010 .

[29]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Lateral buckling of web-tapered I-beams: A new theory , 2008 .

[30]  E. Carrera,et al.  The analysis of tapered structures using a component-wise approach based on refined one-dimensional models , 2017 .

[31]  Moon-Young Kim,et al.  Improved formulation for spatial stability and free vibration of thin-walled tapered beams and space frames , 2000 .

[32]  Reza Attarnejad,et al.  Analysis of Non-Prismatic Timoshenko Beams Using Basic Displacement Functions , 2011 .

[33]  Josef Eberhardsteiner,et al.  Non-prismatic beams: A simple and effective Timoshenko-like model , 2016 .

[34]  C. Hong,et al.  Bending of tapered anisotropic sandwich plates with arbitrary edge conditions , 1992 .

[35]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of Structures through Unified Formulation , 2014 .

[36]  Charles W. Bert,et al.  Vibration analysis of shear deformable circular arches by the differential quadrature method , 1995 .

[37]  Paul M. Weaver,et al.  A mixed inverse differential quadrature method for static analysis of constant- and variable-stiffness laminated beams based on Hellinger-Reissner mixed variational formulation , 2021 .

[38]  G. Zucco,et al.  Efficient three-dimensional geometrically nonlinear analysis of variable stiffness composite beams using strong Unified Formulation , 2021, Thin-Walled Structures.

[39]  C. Shu Differential Quadrature and Its Application in Engineering , 2000 .

[40]  M. Géradin,et al.  Finite element theory for curved and twisted beams based on exact solutions for three-dimensional solids Part 2: Anisotropic and advanced beam models , 1998 .

[41]  Erasmo Carrera,et al.  Carrera Unified Formulation for Free-Vibration Analysis of Aircraft Structures , 2016 .

[42]  J. R. Banerjee,et al.  Linearized buckling analysis of isotropic and composite beam-columns by Carrera Unified Formulation and dynamic stiffness method , 2016 .

[43]  Chang-New Chen DQEM analysis of in-plane vibration of curved beam structures , 2005, Adv. Eng. Softw..