Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling.

Recent experiments have demonstrated that the category goodness of speech sounds strongly influences perception in both adult and infants [Kuhl, Percept. Psychophys. 50, 93-107 (1991); Kuhl et al., Science 255, 606-608 (1992)]. Stimuli judged as exceptionally good instances of phonetic categories (prototypes) make neighboring tokens in the vowel space seem more similar, exhibiting a perceptual magnet effect. Three experiments further examined the perceptual magnet effect in adults. Experiment 1 collected goodness and identification judgments for 13 variants of the vowel /i/. Experiment 2 used signal detection theory to assess the discrimination of these tokens using a bias-free measure (d'). Experiment 3 employed multidimensional scaling (MDS) to geometrically model the distortion of the perceptual space due to the magnet effect. The results demonstrated a strong relationship between category goodness and discrimination. Vowel tokens receiving high goodness ratings in experiment 1 were more difficult to discriminate in experiment 2 and were more tightly clustered in the MDS solutions of experiment 3. These findings support the existence of a perceptual magnet effect, and may help explain some aspects of first language learning in infants and second language learning in adults.

[1]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  S. Singh,et al.  Perceptual structure of 12 American English vowels. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J. Kruskal.  Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method , 1964 .

[4]  R A Fox,et al.  Perceptual Structure of Monophthongs and Diphthongs in English , 1983, Language and speech.

[5]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Speech sounds and features , 1973 .

[6]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory short-term memory and vowel perception , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[7]  T. M. Nearey.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Fox.  Auditory contrast and speaker quality variation in vowel perception. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. Medin,et al.  Categorization processes and categorization perception , 1987 .

[10]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Crosslanguage Study of Vowel Perception , 1969, Language and speech.

[12]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  A. Liberman,et al.  The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels , 1962 .

[14]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[15]  Bishnu S. Atal,et al.  Perceptual differences between vowels located in a limited phonetic space , 1983 .

[16]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Resolution for speech sounds: basic sensitivity and context memory on vowel and consonant continua , 1988 .

[17]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  The Relation between Identification and Discrimination along Speech and Non-Speech Continua , 1963 .

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  H. Goto,et al.  Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R". , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive reference points , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  E. B. Newman,et al.  A Scale for the Measurement of the Psychological Magnitude Pitch , 1937 .

[22]  Howard L. Kaplan,et al.  Tables of d′ for variable-standard discrimination paradigms , 1978 .

[23]  R. Plomp,et al.  Perceptual and physical space of vowel sounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  J. Flanagan.  Estimates of the Maximum Precision Necessary in Quantizing Certain , 1957 .

[26]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[28]  William K. Estes,et al.  Concepts, Categories, and Psychological Science , 1993 .

[29]  J. Kruskal.  Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[30]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories , 1974, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  A. Liberman,et al.  An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English , 1975 .

[32]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Innate Predispositions and the Effects of Experience in Speech Perception: The Native Language Magnet Theory , 1993 .

[33]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[34]  N. Macmillan,et al.  The psychophysics of categorical perception. , 1977, Psychological review.

[35]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  L. Squire,et al.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. , 1993, Science.

[37]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[38]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Categorization of Speech by Infants: Support for Speech-Sound Prototypes. , 1989 .

[39]  J. Lackner,et al.  The Psychological Representation of Speech Sounds , 1975, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  J L Miller,et al.  A possible auditory basis for internal structure of phonetic categories. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  E. Rosch.  ON THE INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF PERCEPTUAL AND SEMANTIC CATEGORIES1 , 1973 .

[42]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Paul Iverson,et al.  Tests of the perceptual magnet effect for American English /r/ and /l/ , 1994 .

[44]  B H Repp,et al.  Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.