Getting to know the neighborhood: using proximity-dependent biotinylation to characterize protein complexes and map organelles.

The use of proximity-dependent biotinylation approaches combined with mass spectrometry (e.g. BioID and APEX) has revolutionized the study of protein-protein interactions and organellar proteomics. These powerful techniques are based on the fusion of an enzyme (e.g. a biotin ligase or peroxidase) to a 'bait' protein of interest, which is then expressed in a relevant biological setting. Addition of enzyme substrate enables covalent biotin labeling of proteins in the vicinity of the bait in vivo. These approaches thus allow for the capture and identification of 'neighborhood' proteins in the context of a living cell, and provide data that are complementary to more established techniques such as fractionation or affinity purification. As compared to standard affinity-based purification approaches, proximity-dependent biotinylation (PDB) can help to: first, identify interactions with and amongst membrane proteins, and other polypeptide classes that are less amenable to study by standard pulldown techniques; second, enrich for transient and/or low affinity interactions that are not readily captured using affinity purification approaches; third, avoid post-lysis artefacts associated with standard biochemical purification experiments and; fourth, provide deep insight into the organization of membrane-less organelles and other subcellular structures that cannot be easily isolated or purified. Given the increasing use of these techniques to answer a variety of different types of biological questions, it is important to understand how best to design PDB-MS experiments, what type of data they generate, and how to analyze and interpret the results.

[1]  J. Cox,et al.  Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization , 2016, eLife.

[2]  Amber L. Couzens,et al.  The CRAPome: a Contaminant Repository for Affinity Purification Mass Spectrometry Data , 2013, Nature Methods.

[3]  L. Gatto,et al.  A draft map of the mouse pluripotent stem cell spatial proteome , 2016, Nature Communications.

[4]  B. Raught,et al.  VAPs and ACBD5 tether peroxisomes to the ER for peroxisome maintenance and lipid homeostasis , 2017, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  J. Sap,et al.  Receptor tyrosine phosphatase R-PTP-alpha is tyrosine-phosphorylated and associated with the adaptor protein Grb2. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  Hyungwon Choi,et al.  ProHits-viz: a suite of web tools for visualizing interaction proteomics data , 2017, Nature Methods.

[7]  E. Chan,et al.  GW182 is critical for the stability of GW bodies expressed during the cell cycle and cell proliferation , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  Hyungwon Choi,et al.  SAINT: Probabilistic Scoring of Affinity Purification - Mass Spectrometry Data , 2010, Nature Methods.

[9]  Nevan J. Krogan,et al.  An Approach to Spatiotemporally Resolve Protein Interaction Networks in Living Cells , 2017, Cell.

[10]  J. Yates,et al.  Proteomics of organelles and large cellular structures , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  Lan Huang,et al.  Identifying Dynamic Interactors of Protein Complexes by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  S. Carr,et al.  Antibodies to biotin enable large-scale detection of biotinylation sites on proteins , 2017, Nature Methods.

[13]  R. Russell,et al.  Landscape of nuclear transport receptor cargo specificity , 2017, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  J. Thornton,et al.  Diversity of protein–protein interactions , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[15]  N. Perrimon,et al.  Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Andrei L. Turinsky,et al.  A Census of Human Soluble Protein Complexes , 2012, Cell.

[17]  J. Olzmann,et al.  A Proximity Labeling Strategy Provides Insights into the Composition and Dynamics of Lipid Droplet Proteomes. , 2018, Developmental cell.

[18]  I. Cristea,et al.  A Portrait of the Human Organelle Proteome In Space and Time during Cytomegalovirus Infection. , 2016, Cell systems.

[19]  Greg W. Clark,et al.  Panorama of ancient metazoan macromolecular complexes , 2015, Nature.

[20]  Anne-Claude Gingras,et al.  Proximity biotinylation and affinity purification are complementary approaches for the interactome mapping of chromatin-associated protein complexes. , 2015, Journal of proteomics.

[21]  Amber L. Couzens,et al.  Phenotypic and Interaction Profiling of the Human Phosphatases Identifies Diverse Mitotic Regulators. , 2016, Cell reports.

[22]  C. Serra-Pages,et al.  Liprins, a Family of LAR Transmembrane Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase-interacting Proteins* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Xiaonan Liu,et al.  An AP-MS- and BioID-compatible MAC-tag enables comprehensive mapping of protein interactions and subcellular localizations , 2018, Nature Communications.

[24]  S. Gygi,et al.  Multidimensional Tracking of GPCR Signaling via Peroxidase-Catalyzed Proximity Labeling , 2017, Cell.

[25]  Mark H. Ellisman,et al.  Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proteomics , 2014, Nature Methods.

[26]  I. Jurisica,et al.  Fundamentals of protein interaction network mapping , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[27]  Stephanie S. Lam,et al.  Proteomic mapping of cytosol-facing outer mitochondrial and ER membranes in living human cells by proximity biotinylation , 2017, eLife.

[28]  K. Lilley,et al.  New Insights into the DT40 B Cell Receptor Cluster Using a Proteomic Proximity Labeling Assay , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  K. Honke,et al.  A proteomics approach to the cell‐surface interactome using the enzyme‐mediated activation of radical sources reaction , 2012, Proteomics.

[30]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Inhibition of the Mitochondrial Protease ClpP as a Therapeutic Strategy for Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[31]  Kathryn S Lilley,et al.  Popular Computational Methods to Assess Multiprotein Complexes Derived From Label-Free Affinity Purification and Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS) Experiments* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[32]  V. Doye,et al.  Probing nuclear pore complex architecture with proximity-dependent biotinylation , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  C. Stewart,et al.  A-type Lamins Form Distinct Filamentous Networks with Differential Nuclear Pore Complex Associations , 2016, Current Biology.

[34]  Mark H. Ellisman,et al.  Proteomic Analysis of Unbounded Cellular Compartments: Synaptic Clefts , 2016, Cell.

[35]  H. Erickson Size and Shape of Protein Molecules at the Nanometer Level Determined by Sedimentation, Gel Filtration, and Electron Microscopy , 2009, Biological Procedures Online.

[36]  S. Gygi,et al.  Defining the Human Deubiquitinating Enzyme Interaction Landscape , 2009, Cell.

[37]  R. Milo,et al.  Cell Biology by the Numbers , 2015 .

[38]  Kenneth H. Roux,et al.  An improved smaller biotin ligase for BioID proximity labeling , 2016, Molecular biology of the cell.

[39]  J. Yates,et al.  Proximity Interactions among Centrosome Components Identify Regulators of Centriole Duplication , 2014, Current Biology.

[40]  Amber L. Couzens,et al.  BioID-based Identification of Skp Cullin F-box (SCF)β-TrCP1/2 E3 Ligase Substrates* , 2015, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[41]  Brian Burke,et al.  A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  L. Foster,et al.  A high-throughput approach for measuring temporal changes in the interactome , 2012, Nature Methods.

[43]  B. Chait,et al.  Determining Protein-Protein Interactions and Proximities 1 A Pipeline for Determining Protein-Protein Interactions and Proximities in the Cellular Milieu , 2014 .

[44]  S. Carr,et al.  Proteomic Mapping of Mitochondria in Living Cells via Spatially Restricted Enzymatic Tagging , 2013, Science.

[45]  Zhenhuan Guo,et al.  E-cadherin interactome complexity and robustness resolved by quantitative proteomics , 2014, Science Signaling.

[46]  E. Manser,et al.  Proximity biotinylation provides insight into the molecular composition of focal adhesions at the nanometer scale , 2016, Science Signaling.

[47]  Gene W. Yeo,et al.  Context-Dependent and Disease-Specific Diversity in Protein Interactions within Stress Granules , 2018, Cell.

[48]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Protein Interaction Network of the Mammalian Hippo Pathway Reveals Mechanisms of Kinase-Phosphatase Interactions , 2013, Science Signaling.

[49]  R. Huganir,et al.  BioSITe: A Method for Direct Detection and Quantitation of Site-Specific Biotinylation. , 2017, Journal of proteome research.

[50]  T. Kupka,et al.  M-Track: detecting short-lived protein-protein interactions in vivo , 2012, Nature Methods.

[51]  A. Gingras,et al.  Beyond hairballs: The use of quantitative mass spectrometry data to understand protein–protein interactions , 2012, FEBS letters.

[52]  Anne-Claude Gingras,et al.  High-Density Proximity Mapping Reveals the Subcellular Organization of mRNA-Associated Granules and Bodies. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[53]  J. Carette,et al.  RNA–protein interaction detection in living cells , 2018, Nature Methods.

[54]  William B. Redwine,et al.  Figures and figure supplements The human cytoplasmic dynein interactome reveals novel activators of motility , 2017 .

[55]  Brian Raught,et al.  A Dynamic Protein Interaction Landscape of the Human Centrosome-Cilium Interface , 2015, Cell.

[56]  Liangyi Chen,et al.  Proteomic mapping of ER-PM junctions identifies STIMATE as regulator of Ca2+ influx , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.