Contour Connection Method for automated identification and classification of landslide deposits

Landslides are a common hazard worldwide that result in major economic, environmental and social impacts. Despite their devastating effects, inventorying existing landslides, often the regions at highest risk of reoccurrence, is challenging, time-consuming, and expensive. Current landslide mapping techniques include field inventorying, photogrammetric approaches, and use of bare-earth (BE) lidar digital terrain models (DTMs) to highlight regions of instability. However, many techniques do not have sufficient resolution, detail, and accuracy for mapping across landscape scale with the exception of using BE DTMs, which can reveal the landscape beneath vegetation and other obstructions, highlighting landslide features, including scarps, deposits, fans and more. Current approaches to landslide inventorying with lidar to create BE DTMs include manual digitizing, statistical or machine learning approaches, and use of alternate sensors (e.g., hyperspectral imaging) with lidar.This paper outlines a novel algorithm to automatically and consistently detect landslide deposits on a landscape scale. The proposed method is named as the Contour Connection Method (CCM) and is primarily based on bare earth lidar data requiring minimal user input such as the landslide scarp and deposit gradients. The CCM algorithm functions by applying contours and nodes to a map, and using vectors connecting the nodes to evaluate gradient and associated landslide features based on the user defined input criteria. Furthermore, in addition to the detection capabilities, CCM also provides an opportunity to be potentially used to classify different landscape features. This is possible because each landslide feature has a distinct set of metadata - specifically, density of connection vectors on each contour - that provides a unique signature for each landslide. In this paper, demonstrations of using CCM are presented by applying the algorithm to the region surrounding the Oso landslide in Washington (March 2014), as well as two 14,000ha DTMs in Oregon, which were used as a comparison of CCM and manually delineated landslide deposits. The results show the capability of the CCM with limited data requirements and the agreement with manual delineation but achieving the results at a much faster time. CCM presents a new way of detecting landslide deposits using Bare Earth LiDAR.CCM requires simple input data to perform automated landslide deposit detection.Each landslide has an associated signature that can be used for classification.CCM presents a supplement to manual landslide inventorying.

[1]  Michael J. Olsen,et al.  Automated quantification of distributed landslide movement using circular tree trunks extracted from terrestrial laser scan data , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  A. K. Turner,et al.  Landslides : investigation and mitigation , 1996 .

[3]  William H. Schulz,et al.  Landslide susceptibility revealed by LIDAR imagery and historical records, Seattle, Washington , 2007 .

[4]  Charles K. Toth,et al.  A PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING USING MULTI-TEMPORAL AIRBORNE LIDAR DATA , 2014 .

[5]  Andrea Antonioli,et al.  The early events after the June 17 2000 mainshock in South Iceland: constraints for instantaneous dynamic triggering with rate- and state-dependent friction , 2005 .

[6]  D. H. Cornforth,et al.  Landslides in Practice: Investigation, Analysis, and Remedial/Preventative Options in Soils , 2005 .

[7]  Guoquan Wang,et al.  Delineating and defining the boundaries of an active landslide in the rainforest of Puerto Rico using a combination of airborne and terrestrial LIDAR data , 2013, Landslides.

[8]  J. Roering,et al.  Automated landslide mapping using spectral analysis and high-resolution topographic data: Puget Sound lowlands, Washington, and Portland Hills, Oregon , 2008 .

[9]  Ben Leshchinsky.  Comparison of Limit Equilibrium and Limit Analysis for Complex Slopes , 2013 .

[10]  Gregory I. Snyder.  The 3D Elevation Program: summary of program direction , 2012 .

[11]  Ralph Albert Haugerud.  Preliminary interpretation of pre-2014 landslide deposits in the vicinity of Oso, Washington , 2014 .

[12]  Kaiguang Zhao,et al.  Ground Filtering Algorithms for Airborne LiDAR Data: A Review of Critical Issues , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Michael J. Olsen,et al.  Movement and Erosion Quantification of the Johnson Creek, Oregon, Landslide through 3D Laser Scanning , 2012 .

[14]  S. L. Kuriakose,et al.  Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview , 2008 .

[15]  Michael J. Olsen,et al.  In Situ Change Analysis and Monitoring through Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2015, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[16]  W. Mauser,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis of Very High-Resolution QuickBird Data for Mega City Research in Delhi/India , 2007, 2007 Urban Remote Sensing Joint Event.

[17]  Ben Leshchinsky,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling of Slope Instability , 2009 .

[18]  William J. Burns,et al.  Protocol for inventory mapping of landslide deposits from light detection and ranging (lidar) imagery , 2009 .

[19]  Michel JaboyedoffThierry.  Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review , 2012 .

[20]  J. M.R,et al.  UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide : Evaluation and results , 2014 .

[21]  D. Cruden.  A simple definition of a landslide , 1991 .

[22]  William E. Dietrich,et al.  Validation of the Shallow Landslide Model, SHALSTAB, for Forest Management , 2013 .