Does the scoring of late responses affect the outcome of the paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT)?

The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT) is a cognitive task purported to measure working memory, speed of information processing, and sustained and divided attention (Spreen, O. & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.) The current study examined whether treating late responses on the PASAT as correct or as incorrect can significantly affect the outcome of the test in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Subjects consisted of 59 individuals with MS and 37 healthy controls (HC). Scoring method was found to affect the number of individuals who were considered impaired on the PASAT. When participants were penalized for late responses significantly more participants, in both groups, were found to be impaired on the 2s trial of the task (MS: p<0.01; HC: p<0.05). Results indicate that that the specific scoring of the PASAT should be reported in studies that use the test.

[1]  A. Wiens,et al.  Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test: adult norms and moderator variables. , 1997, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[2]  Alessandra Solari,et al.  The multiple sclerosis functional composite: different practice effects in the three test components , 2005, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[3]  Stephen M. Rao Cognitive Function in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Impairment and Treatment , 2004 .

[4]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Speed of information processing as a key deficit in multiple sclerosis: implications for rehabilitation , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  I. Grant,et al.  The 50 and 100-Item Short Forms of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT): Demographically Corrected Norms and Comparisons with the Full PASAT in Normal and Clinical Samples , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[6]  O. Spreen,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1991 .

[7]  K. Greve,et al.  Assessment of executive function in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  T. Tombaugh,et al.  A comprehensive review of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT). , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[9]  D. Gronwall Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. , 1991, Neurology.

[11]  D. Cox,et al.  Cognitive and psychomotor function in hypoglycemia: response error patterns and retest reliability , 2003, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[12]  Guy Nagels,et al.  Paced visual serial addition test in multiple sclerosis , 2004, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[13]  D. Bourdette,et al.  Cognitive Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis , 2002, CNS drugs.

[14]  J. Fisk,et al.  Information Processing Efficiency in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis , 2000, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[15]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Is Speed of Processing or Working Memory the Primary Information Processing Deficit in Multiple Sclerosis? , 2004, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[16]  R. Heaton,et al.  The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (Pasat): Norms For Age, Education, And Ethnicity , 1998, Assessment.

[17]  S. Reingold,et al.  The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite measure (MSFC): an integrated approach to MS clinical outcome assessment , 1999, Multiple sclerosis.

[18]  J. DeLuca,et al.  The question of disproportionate impairments in visual and auditory information processing in multiple sclerosis. , 1997, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[19]  Deborah M. Miller,et al.  Clinical significance of the multiple sclerosis functional composite: relationship to patient-reported quality of life. , 2000, Archives of neurology.

[20]  J. Patton,et al.  Extended norms for the paced auditory serial addition task , 1991 .

[21]  P. Sjøgren,et al.  Neuropsychological performance in cancer patients: the role of oral opioids, pain and performance status , 2000, Pain.

[22]  D. Postma,et al.  Treatment of nocturnal airway obstruction improves daytime cognitive performance in asthmatics. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[23]  R. Benedict,et al.  Working memory and processing speed deficits in systemic lupus erythematosus as measured by the paced auditory serial addition test , 2004, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[24]  P. Sjøgren,et al.  Impaired neuropsychological performance in chronic nonmalignant pain patients receiving long-term oral opioid therapy. , 2000, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[25]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[26]  D. Silberberg,et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols , 1983, Annals of neurology.

[27]  D. Roth,et al.  Effects of age and IQ on paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT) performance , 1991 .

[28]  J. DeLuca,et al.  Differentiating Simple Versus Complex Processing Speed: Influence on New Learning and Memory Performance , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.