Learner-centered social support: enhancing online distance education for underserved rural high school students in the United States

Over the past decade, federal programs in the United States have largely addressed the well-documented problem of differences in basic access to technology between rural schools and their suburban and urban counterparts. Consequently, rural schools are better able to prepare their students for post-secondary education and the workplace where digital literacy is essential. As technology access improves, online distance education (ODE) is seen as a solution to significant challenges faced by rural schools, including a lack of highly-qualified teachers and declining population. However, ODE has high attrition rates, partly because participants’ social needs are often neglected. Additionally, students' success depends on their abilities to engage in self-regulated learning, effective time management and self-reflection, skills that many high school students are still developing. This paper describes an experimental research study funded by the U.S. Department of Education, currently underway in rural high schools across the U.S. The research adds to a growing body of work that attempts to expand understanding of the digital divide. Increasingly, schools realise that this is no longer an issue of mere access to equipment; education technology projects should incorporate strategies that ensure the success of previously marginalised communities. Our intervention, based on the APA’s Learner- Centered Principles, involves training on-site facilitators to provide social support for students involved in ODE. Preliminary findings indicate that the intervention group has a significantly lower dropout rate.

[1]  W. Hannum,et al.  Analysis of distance education use in rural schools , 2006 .

[2]  F. Belcastro Electronic technology and its use with rural gifted students , 2002 .

[3]  Kerry Rice,et al.  A Comprehensive Look at Distance Education in the K–12 Context , 2006 .

[4]  Marcy P. Driscoll,et al.  Facilitator and Student Roles and Performance in a High School Distance Education Course. , 1997 .

[5]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 2004 .

[6]  B. McCombs,et al.  A Learner-Centered Framework for E-Learning , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[7]  Yuliang Liu Experimental Effects of Online Instruction on Locus of Control , 2002 .

[8]  Lorna Jimerson Breaking the Fall: Cushioning the Impact of Rural Declining Enrollment. Rural Trust Policy Brief Series on Rural Education. , 2006 .

[9]  O. Simpson The impact on retention of interventions to support distance learning students , 2004 .

[10]  Jerry D. Johnson,et al.  Why Rural Matters 2005: The Facts about Rural Education in the 50 States. , 2005 .

[11]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[12]  R. Pianta,et al.  Teacher-Child Relationships and Children's Success in the First Years of School , 2004 .

[13]  Janine M. Zweig Vulnerable Youth: Identifying their Need for Alternative Educational Settings , 2003 .

[14]  Sandra Frid,et al.  Supporting Primary Students' On-Line Learning in a Virtual Enrichment Program , 2001 .

[15]  Barbara L. McCombs,et al.  Learner-Centered Classroom Practices and Assessments: Maximizing Student Motivation, Learning, and Achievement , 2006 .

[16]  Terri Duggan Schwartzbeck,et al.  How Are Rural Districts Meeting the Teacher Quality Requirements of No Child Left Behind , 2003 .

[17]  Theodore R. Alter,et al.  Bringing the Community Along: A Case Study of a School District's Information Technology Rural Development Initiative. , 2006 .