Performance of Nanofiltration Membranes in Ethanol

Abstract Several nanofiltration membranes were tested for flux and rejection of selected solutes in ethanol. The membranes were initially conditioned with pure solvent containing increasing concentrations of ethanol. Flux decreased with increase in ethanol concentration and increased at higher temperatures and pressures. The type of solute had an influence on membrane rejection profiles. The DK membrane showed increasing rejection of polyethylene glycols (PEG) dissolved in ethanol from 29% at a molecular weight (MW) of 200 to 80% at MW 1000. However, the MW of sugars and lipids had little or no effect on rejection with the DK membrane; their rejection averaged 87%. In contrast, the TFC‐SR1 membrane showed higher rejections with higher MW compounds: lipid rejection increased from 19% to 71%, sugars from 35% to 85%, and lipids from 77% to 89%. The TFC‐SR2 membrane was much more open and showed the lowest rejections of all these compounds. Flux generally showed opposite trends, with the DK showing the lowest flux and the SR2 the highest. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

[1]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook , 1998 .

[2]  Dibakar Bhattacharyya,et al.  Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling , 2001 .

[3]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes: Part II. Transport model , 2000 .

[4]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I: investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux , 1999 .

[5]  B. Van der Bruggen,et al.  Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration , 1999 .

[6]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY IN THE VEGETABLE OIL INDUSTRY , 2005 .

[7]  M. Cheryan,et al.  Performance of ultrafiltration membranes in ethanol–water solutions: effect of membrane conditioning , 2002 .

[8]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Characteristics of nanofiltration membranes in aqueous ethanol , 2004 .

[9]  M. Cheryan,et al.  Stability and Performance of Ultrafiltration Membranes in Aqueous Ethanol , 2003 .

[10]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  A Comparison of Models to Describe the Maximal Retention of Organic Molecules in Nanofiltration , 2000 .

[11]  Shin-ichi Nakao,et al.  Separation of linear hydrocarbons and carboxylic acids from ethanol and hexane solutions by reverse osmosis , 2001 .

[12]  Recovery of corn oil from ethanol extracts of ground corn using membrane technology , 2005 .