Motivating creativity through a computer-mediated employee suggestion management system

This paper describes the requirements for an automated employee suggestion management system (ESMS) based on expectancy theory and computer-mediated communications. Although research has found that suggestion systems can be a useful way to obtain and utilize employees' creative ideas, effective suggestion management systems must also motivate employees to think creatively and to participate in the suggestion process. According to expectancy theory, employees are most strongly motivated to participate when they believe that they can do so successfully and when they know that their participation will result in an outcome that they value. The system proposed here addresses the requirements of expectancy theory, and the weaknesses of existing suggestion systems, by establishing a communications infrastructure and protocol similar to those used in group decision support systems. The system motivates employees to submit suggestions by providing an interactive networked forum within which employees and interested stakeholders can openly debate their merits.

[1]  G. Lynn,et al.  The Role of Personality in New Product Development Team Performance , 2002 .

[2]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[3]  J. Fairbank,et al.  Motivating Creativity and Enhancing Innovation through Employee Suggestion System Technology , 2001 .

[4]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[5]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[6]  M. Hitt,et al.  Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay , 2000 .

[7]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  Between-subjects expectancy theory research: A statistical review of studies predicting effort and performance. , 1979 .

[8]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  M. Crossan.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[10]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[11]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[12]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  The Intrinsic-Extrinsic Dichotomy: Toward Conceptual Clarity , 1977 .

[13]  C. Ford.  A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains , 1996 .

[14]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[15]  Craig K. Tyran,et al.  Group Support Systems for Strategic Planning , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Future research in group support systems: needs, some questions and possible directions , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[18]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[19]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Polarization and Persuasive Argumentation: A Study of Decision Making in Group Settings , 1998, MIS Q..

[20]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas , 2000 .

[21]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[22]  M. Glynn.  Innovative Genius: A Framework for Relating Individual and Organizational Intelligences to Innovation , 1996 .

[23]  E. Bono.  Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity , 1970 .

[24]  Rodney McAdam,et al.  Sources of new product ideas and creativity practices in the UK textile industry , 2002 .

[25]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation , 1972 .

[26]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Meetings of the Future: Enhancing Group Collaboration with Group Support Systems , 1997 .

[27]  U. J. Wiersma.  The effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis , 1992 .

[28]  S. Kerr.  On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. , 1975, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[29]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[30]  C Atkinson,et al.  Open to suggestions. , 1991, The Health service journal.

[31]  G. Hamel.  Leading the Revolution , 2000 .

[32]  Simon S. K. Lam,et al.  The Effects of Group Decision Support Systems and Task Structures on Group Communication and Decision Quality , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Mary Ann Glynn,et al.  Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual intelligences to innovation. , 1996 .