Product lifecycle-oriented quality and productivity improvement based on stream of variation methodology

Manufacturers in the 21st century will face increased customization, product proliferation, shorter product lifecycle and development time, responsiveness, frequent and unpredictable market changes. To gain the competitive advantage, manufacturing companies must be able to analyze and predict product quality during the product design phase and identify root causes of all faults for productivity improvement during ramp-up time and production time. Therefore, a new manufacturing strategy, namely, stream of variation (SoV) methodology, has been proposed, developed and applied. The SoV methodology is a generic math model for modeling, analysis, prediction and control of product quality and productivity improvement in complex multistage manufacturing systems such as automotive, aerospace, appliance, and electronics industries. The methodology integrates multivariate statistics, control theory and design/manufacturing knowledge into a unified framework and can help in eliminating costly trial-and-error fine-tuning of new-product manufacturing processes throughout the product design and manufacturing. The related issues of the state-of-the-art practice, goals, benefits and future directions related to SoV methodology are discussed, which include rationale of SoV, state space model, root causes identification, etc. An application example is also provided.

[1]  A. G. U Lso,et al.  Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: Key to future manufacturing , 2000 .

[2]  Rajan Suri,et al.  Quick Response Manufacturing , 1998 .

[3]  John A. Buzacott,et al.  A perspective on new paradigms in manufacturing , 1995 .

[4]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Modeling and controlling variation propagation in mechanical assemblies using state transition models , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Xun Chen,et al.  Life cycle model of the grinding process , 1998 .

[6]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  Diagnosis of Multiple Fixture Faults in Panel Assembly , 1996, Manufacturing Science and Engineering.

[7]  F. Musharavati RECONFIGURABLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2010 .

[8]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Stream-of-Variation Theory for Automotive Body Assembly , 1997 .

[9]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  A Framework for Including the Value of Time in Design-for-manufacturing Decision Making , 1993 .

[10]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models , 2005 .

[11]  Philip R. Moore,et al.  Modelling of the life cycle of products with data acquisition features , 2001, Comput. Ind..

[12]  Xi,et al.  STATE SPACE MODELING OF DIMENSIONAL MACHINING ERRORS OF SERIAL-PARALLEL HYBRID MULTI-STAGE MACHINING SYSTEM , 2007 .

[13]  J. A. Robinson,et al.  Analysis of Variation Transmission in Manufacturing Processes—Part I , 1999 .

[14]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Part Dimensional Error and Its Propagation Modeling in Multi-Operational Machining , 2003 .

[15]  Yu Ding,et al.  MODELING AND DIAGNOSIS OF MULTISTAGE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES: PART I - STATE SPACE MODEL , 2000 .

[16]  Qiang Huang,et al.  State space modeling of dimensional variation propagation in multistage machining process using differential motion vectors , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  Milan Gregor,et al.  Simulation in production system life cycle , 1999 .

[18]  Xi Lifeng,et al.  Distributed sensor system for fault detection and isolation in multistage manufacturing systems , 2006 .

[19]  Jaime A. Camelio,et al.  Modeling Variation Propagation of Multi-Station Assembly Systems With Compliant Parts , 2003 .

[20]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  A Discussion on Statistically-Based Process Monitoring and Control , 1997 .

[21]  Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson,et al.  Leveraging knowledge representation, usage, and interpretation to help reengineer the product development life cycle: visual computing and the tacit dimensions of product development , 2003, Comput. Ind..

[22]  Jionghua Jin,et al.  State Space Modeling of Sheet Metal Assembly for Dimensional Control , 1999 .