POLICE PROBLEMS: THE COMPLEXITY OF PROBLEM THEORY, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

Advancement of problem-oriented policing has been stymied by over-attention to police organizations and under-attention to police problems. This paper develops a research agenda for understanding police problems by addressing four fundamental questions: What are problems? What causes problems? How can we find effective solutions to problems? And how can we learn from problem solving? For each question a possible direction for theory, research, or evaluation is sug- gested. The variety of police problems, their non-linear feedback sys- tems, the diversity of responses that can be applied to problems, and the difficulty of learning from problem-solving experiences highlight the complexity of police problems. The paper closes with a list of research questions designed to improve the science and practice of problem analysis and solution.

[1]  J. Casti.  Would-Be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science , 1996 .

[2]  Lin Liu,et al.  Simulating crimes and crime patterns using cellular automata and gis , 2001 .

[3]  R. Landauer,et al.  Thinking in Complexity: The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind, and Mankind , 1995 .

[4]  John E. Eck,et al.  Preventing crime at places , 2003 .

[5]  T. P. Thornberry,et al.  Membership in youth gangs and involvement in serious and violent offending. , 1998 .

[6]  Nick Tilley,et al.  Problem-oriented Policing: Brit Pop , 1996 .

[7]  Bill Broyles.  Notes , 1907, The Classical Review.

[8]  Graham Farrell,et al.  Repeat victimization and hot spots: the overlap and its implications for crime control and problem-orientated policing. , 2001 .

[9]  William Spelman,et al.  CRIMINAL CAREERS OF PUBLIC PLACES , 1995 .

[10]  Ken Pease,et al.  Repeat Victimisation: Taking Stock , 1998 .

[11]  Walter S. DeKeseredy,et al.  Male peer support and a feminist routing activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus , 2001 .

[12]  R. Homel,et al.  A Revised Classification of Situational Crime Prevention Techniques , 1997 .

[13]  Marcus Felson,et al.  ROUTINE ACTIVITIES AND CRIME PREVENTION IN THE DEVELOPINGMETROPOLIS , 1987 .

[14]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[15]  J. Fagan,et al.  The Effects of Arrest on Intimate Partner Violence: New Evidence From the Spouse Assault Replication Program , 2001 .

[16]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and refutations;: The growth of scientific knowledge , 1972 .

[17]  E. Mayr.  What Evolution Is , 2001 .

[18]  Henry Petroski,et al.  To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design , 1986 .

[19]  L. Sherman,et al.  Problem-Oriented Policing , 2009 .

[20]  G. Williams.  Chaos theory tamed , 1997 .

[21]  B. Gruenberg.  What Evolution Is , 1926 .

[22]  M. Felson,et al.  Opportunity Makes the Thief Practical theory for crime prevention , 1998 .

[23]  H. Goldstein.  Improving Policing: A Problem-Oriented Approach , 1979 .

[24]  Brandon C. Welsh,et al.  Evidence-Based Crime Prevention , 2002 .

[25]  R. Dawkins.  Climbing Mount Improbable , 1996 .

[26]  David Weisburd,et al.  Does Research Design Affect Study Outcomes in Criminal Justice? , 2001 .

[27]  William Spelman,et al.  Once bitten, then what?: Cross-sectional and time-course explanations of repeat victimization , 1995 .

[28]  M. Lipsey,et al.  The Way in Which Intervention Studies Have “Personality” and why it is Important to Meta-Analysis , 2001, Evaluation & the health professions.