Characterization of physicochemical properties of nanomaterials and their immediate environments in high-throughput screening of nanomaterial biological activity.

Thousands of nanomaterials (NMs) are in commerce and few have toxicity data. To prioritize NMs for toxicity testing, high-throughput screening (HTS) of biological activity may be the only practical and timely approach to provide the necessary information. As in all nanotoxicologic studies, characterization of physicochemical properties of NMs and their immediate environments in HTS is critical to understanding how these properties affect NM bioactivity and to allow extrapolation to NMs not screened. The purpose of the study, the expert-groups-recommended minimal characterization, and NM physicochemical properties likely to affect measured bioactivity all help determine the scope of characterization. A major obstacle in reaping the full benefits of HTS for NMs is the low throughput of NM physicochemical characterization, which may require more sample quantity than HTS assays. Increasing the throughput and speed, and decreasing the amount of NMs needed for characterization are crucial. Finding characterization techniques and biological activity assays compatible with diverse classes of NMs is a challenge and multiple approaches for the same endpoints may be necessary. Use of computational tools and nanoinformatics for organizing and analyzing data are important to fully utilize the power of HTS. Other desired advances include the ability to more fully characterize: pristine NM without prior knowledge of NM physicochemical properties; non-pristine NMs (e.g., after use); NM in not-perfectly-dispersed suspension; and NM in biological samples at exposure-relevant conditions. Through combining HTS and physicochemical characterization results, we will better understand NM bioactivities, prioritize NMs for further testing, and build computational models to predict NM toxicity.

[1]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Nanomaterials for environmental studies: classification, reference material issues, and strategies for physico-chemical characterisation. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Piotr Grodzinski,et al.  Nanotechnology Environmental, Health, and Safety Issues , 2011 .

[3]  Agnes B Kane,et al.  Adsorption of essential micronutrients by carbon nanotubes and the implications for nanotoxicity testing. , 2008, Small.

[4]  Benjamin Gilbert,et al.  Use of a rapid cytotoxicity screening approach to engineer a safer zinc oxide nanoparticle through iron doping. , 2010, ACS nano.

[5]  Iseult Lynch,et al.  Minimal analytical characterization of engineered nanomaterials needed for hazard assessment in biological matrices , 2011, Nanotoxicology.

[6]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Alternative in vitro assays in nanomaterial toxicology. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[7]  Alaaldin M. Alkilany,et al.  The gold standard: gold nanoparticle libraries to understand the nano-bio interface. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[8]  D. Bello,et al.  A high throughput in vitro analytical approach to screen for oxidative stress potential exerted by nanomaterials using a biologically relevant matrix: human blood serum. , 2008, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[9]  H. Bouwmeester,et al.  A review of analytical methods for the identification and characterization of nano delivery systems in food. , 2008, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[10]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  The use of Bayesian networks for nanoparticle risk forecasting: model formulation and baseline evaluation. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Quantitative nanostructure-activity relationship modeling. , 2010, ACS nano.

[12]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Limitation of the MTT and XTT assays for measuring cell viability due to superoxide formation induced by nano-scale TiO2. , 2011, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[13]  Courtney R. Thomas,et al.  Surface defects on plate-shaped silver nanoparticles contribute to its hazard potential in a fish gill cell line and zebrafish embryos. , 2012, ACS nano.

[14]  François Béguin,et al.  Structural defects play a major role in the acute lung toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes: toxicological aspects. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  Maureen R. Gwinn,et al.  Comprehensive Environmental Assessment: A Meta-Assessment Approach , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  K. Wepasnick,et al.  Chemical and structural characterization of carbon nanotube surfaces , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[17]  Benjamin P Colman,et al.  Biotic and abiotic interactions in aquatic microcosms determine fate and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles: part 2-toxicity and Ag speciation. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  David Jassby,et al.  Impact of aggregate size and structure on the photocatalytic properties of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  James E Hutchison,et al.  Generation of metal nanoparticles from silver and copper objects: nanoparticle dynamics on surfaces and potential sources of nanoparticles in the environment. , 2011, ACS nano.

[20]  J. Lazorchak,et al.  Effects from filtration, capping agents, and presence/absence of food on the toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Daphnia magna , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[21]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  Detection, characterization, and abundance of engineered nanoparticles in complex waters by hyperspectral imagery with enhanced Darkfield microscopy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  A. Boxall,et al.  Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment , 2008, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[23]  R. Aitken,et al.  Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: Current abilities and future requirements , 2007 .

[24]  Jason M. Unrine,et al.  Biotic and abiotic interactions in aquatic microcosms determine fate and toxicity of Ag nanoparticles. Part 1. Aggregation and dissolution. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Validation of an LDH assay for assessing nanoparticle toxicity. , 2011, Toxicology.

[26]  S. Diamond,et al.  Phototoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles under solar radiation to two aquatic species: Daphnia magna and Japanese medaka , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[27]  Roberto Cingolani,et al.  Effects of cell culture media on the dynamic formation of protein-nanoparticle complexes and influence on the cellular response. , 2010, ACS nano.

[28]  Robert L. Tanguay,et al.  Embryonic toxicity changes of organic nanomaterials in the presence of natural organic matter. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Saber M Hussain,et al.  Characterization of nanomaterial dispersion in solution prior to in vitro exposure using dynamic light scattering technique. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[30]  Darcy J. Gentleman,et al.  A systematic nomenclature for codifying engineered nanostructures. , 2009, Small.

[31]  Yinfa Ma,et al.  Toxicity of nano- and micro-sized ZnO particles in human lung epithelial cells , 2009 .

[32]  Jerzy Leszczynski,et al.  Advancing risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials: application of computational approaches. , 2012, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[33]  Younan Xia,et al.  The effect of sedimentation and diffusion on cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[34]  Adam Yasgar,et al.  Quantitative high-throughput screening: a titration-based approach that efficiently identifies biological activities in large chemical libraries. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Lutz Mädler,et al.  Nanomaterials in the environment: from materials to high-throughput screening to organisms. , 2011, ACS nano.

[36]  Kirk G Scheckel,et al.  Impact of environmental conditions (pH, ionic strength, and electrolyte type) on the surface charge and aggregation of silver nanoparticles suspensions. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Wouter Fransman,et al.  Stoffenmanager Nano version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. , 2012, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[38]  Brian Curwin,et al.  Exposure Characterization of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in the Workplace , 2011, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[39]  Erik K Richman,et al.  The nanomaterial characterization bottleneck. , 2009, ACS nano.

[40]  Aravind Subramanian,et al.  Perturbational profiling of nanomaterial biologic activity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Geert Cornelis,et al.  Size discrimination and detection capabilities of single-particle ICPMS for environmental analysis of silver nanoparticles. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[42]  Robert M Zucker,et al.  In vitro phototoxicity and hazard identification of nano-scale titanium dioxide. , 2012, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[43]  N. Monteiro-Riviere,et al.  Limitations and relative utility of screening assays to assess engineered nanoparticle toxicity in a human cell line. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[44]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Toxico-/biokinetics of nanomaterials , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[45]  Jesse T. Myers,et al.  pH-dependent regulation of lysosomal calcium in macrophages. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[46]  Mara Ghiazza,et al.  Physico-chemical features of engineered nanoparticles relevant to their toxicity , 2010, Nanotoxicology.

[47]  R. Zucker,et al.  Detection of TiO2 nanoparticles in cells by flow cytometry. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[48]  T. Seager,et al.  Coupling multi-criteria decision analysis, life-cycle assessment, and risk assessment for emerging threats. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[49]  Robert Rallo,et al.  Use of a high-throughput screening approach coupled with in vivo zebrafish embryo screening to develop hazard ranking for engineered nanomaterials. , 2011, ACS nano.

[50]  Stacey L. Harper,et al.  Systematic Evaluation of Nanomaterial Toxicity: Utility of Standardized Materials and Rapid Assays , 2011, ACS nano.

[51]  Darrell R. Boverhof,et al.  Nanomaterial characterization: considerations and needs for hazard assessment and safety evaluation , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[52]  A. Hopkins,et al.  Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.

[53]  David Y Lai,et al.  Toward toxicity testing of nanomaterials in the 21st century: a paradigm for moving forward. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[54]  Martha Marrapese,et al.  Current Perspectives in Nanotechnology Terminology and Nomenclature , 2011 .

[55]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[56]  A. von Mikecz,et al.  In Caenorhabditis elegans Nanoparticle-Bio-Interactions Become Transparent: Silica-Nanoparticles Induce Reproductive Senescence , 2009, PloS one.

[57]  Michala E Pettitt,et al.  Minimum physicochemical characterisation requirements for nanomaterial regulation. , 2013, Environment international.

[58]  Fernando González-Nilo,et al.  Nanoinformatics: an emerging area of information technology at the intersection of bioinformatics, computational chemistry and nanobiotechnology. , 2011, Biological research.

[59]  Christof Asbach,et al.  Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review , 2011, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[60]  James F. Ranville,et al.  Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[61]  Joel G Pounds,et al.  Particokinetics in vitro: dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle toxicity assessments. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[62]  Christina M. Powers,et al.  Silver Nanoparticles Compromise Neurodevelopment in PC12 Cells: Critical Contributions of Silver Ion, Particle Size, Coating, and Composition , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[63]  J. Nagy,et al.  Structural defects play a major role in the acute lung toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes: physicochemical aspects. , 2008, Chemical research in toxicology.

[64]  Anthony R Scialli,et al.  The challenge of reproductive and developmental toxicology under REACH. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[65]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  NanoParticle Ontology for cancer nanotechnology research , 2011, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[66]  J. Schauer,et al.  Particle size distributions of metal and non-metal elements in an urban near-highway environment , 2011 .

[67]  P. Biswas,et al.  Concept of Assessing Nanoparticle Hazards Considering Nanoparticle Dosemetric and Chemical/Biological Response Metrics , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[68]  A. Rao,et al.  The influence of natural organic matter on the toxicity of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[69]  G. Thollet,et al.  Wet STEM: a new development in environmental SEM for imaging nano-objects included in a liquid phase. , 2005, Ultramicroscopy.

[70]  C. Higginbotham,et al.  Effect of serum concentration on the cytotoxicity of clay particles , 2012, Cell biology international.

[71]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  Nanotechnology: Health and Environmental Risks , 2008 .

[72]  Helinor Johnston,et al.  Development of in vitro systems for nanotoxicology: methodological considerations , 2009, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[73]  B. Spivakov,et al.  Fractionation and characterization of nano- and microparticles in liquid media , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[74]  Lei Yu,et al.  Quantitative gold nanoparticle analysis methods: A review. , 2010, Talanta.

[75]  Alexandra Kroll,et al.  Testing Metal‐Oxide Nanomaterials for Human Safety , 2010 .

[76]  O. Seksek,et al.  Nuclear pH gradient in mammalian cells revealed by laser microspectrofluorimetry. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[77]  H. Krug,et al.  Oops they did it again! Carbon nanotubes hoax scientists in viability assays. , 2006, Nano letters.

[78]  A. Nel,et al.  Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. , 2011, Small.

[79]  Jeremy M. Gernand,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Carbon Nanotube Pulmonary Toxicity Studies—How Physical Dimensions and Impurities Affect the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[80]  M. Kandlikar,et al.  The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[81]  J. M. Davis,et al.  How to assess the risks of nanotechnology: learning from past experience. , 2007, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[82]  Kun Yang,et al.  Different stabilities of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in fresh surface water samples. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[83]  Andrew P. Worth,et al.  QSAR modeling of nanomaterials. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[84]  R. Mumper,et al.  Effect of carbon coating on the physico-chemical properties and toxicity of copper and nickel nanoparticles. , 2012, Small.