The impact of secondary user mobility and primary user activity on spectrum sensing in cognitive vehicular networks

In cognitive vehicular networks, unlicensed secondary users heavily depend on spectrum sensing to find unused spectrum bands for communications. The performance study of existing spectrum sensing algorithms often overlooks the impact of secondary user mobility.Many of them assume secondary users stationary or with low mobility. In this paper, we investigate the joint impact of secondary user mobility and primary user activity on spectrum sensing for highly dynamic cognitive vehicular networks. We assume that each vehicle is equipped with a cognitive radio for spectrum sensing. The main contribution of this work is to investigate mathematical models for missdetection probability and expected overlapping time duration for spectrum sensing. The proposed method incorporates velocity of secondary user, activity of primary user, initial distance between primary and secondary users and their transmission ranges. In ordered to corroborate the analysis, numerical results obtained from simulations are presented. It is noted that the speed of the vehicular secondary user and the activity of primary user have significant impact on miss-detection probability, but not on false alarm probability. Furthermore, transmission range, velocity and initial separation distance have huge impact on expected overlapping time duration.

[1]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Optimal spectrum sensing framework for cognitive radio networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[3]  Khaled Ben Letaief,et al.  Spectrum sensing with active cognitive systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Mahmood Fathy,et al.  Improving connectivity in vehicular ad hoc networks: An analytical study , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[5]  Sachin Shetty,et al.  Enhancing connectivity for spectrum-agile Vehicular Ad hoc NETworks in fading channels , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.

[6]  Hüseyin Arslan,et al.  A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[7]  Danda B. Rawat,et al.  Advances on Security Threats and Countermeasures for Cognitive Radio Networks: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Chunsheng Xin,et al.  A weighted cooperative spectrum sensing framework for infrastructure-based cognitive radio networks , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[9]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Primary-user mobility impact on spectrum sensing in Cognitive Radio networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[10]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  Impact of mobility on spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks , 2009, CoRoNet '09.

[11]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: A survey , 2011, Phys. Commun..

[12]  Sachin Shetty,et al.  Dynamic Spectrum Access for Wireless Networks , 2015, SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[13]  Carl A. Gunter,et al.  Secure Collaborative Sensing for Crowd Sourcing Spectrum Data in White Space Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum (DySPAN).

[14]  J. I. Mararm,et al.  Energy Detection of Unknown Deterministic Signals , 2022 .

[15]  Chunsheng Xin,et al.  Performance analysis of spectrum sensing with mobile SUs in cognitive radio networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[16]  Gongjun Yan,et al.  Provisioning Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks with Quality of Service , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications.