Data-driven Operation-based Aircraft Design Optimization

In this work, we integrate a mission analysis algorithm into the Multidisciplinary Airplane Research Integrated Library (MARILib), which is a multidisciplinary optimization tool for aircraft sizing. The main purpose of such an integration is to include aircraft operational data from the initial design process, to develop a more realistic aircraft design framework. With this approach, the design and mission requirements that reflect how aircraft actually operate are considered in the design process. Mission analysis tools are developed to model realistic aircraft operations. Data analytics, including clustering algorithms, is performed to extract information from flight data, which then becomes input to MARILib. The aim of the framework is to reduce operational costs of aircraft starting from the initial design itself, by incorporating air transportation data into the conceptual design stages.

[1]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization , 2015 .

[2]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .

[3]  Daniel Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, Sixth Edition , 2012 .

[4]  Cesare A. Hall,et al.  Improved Range Equation Based on Aircraft Flight Data , 2011 .

[5]  T. Pulliam,et al.  Multipoint and Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Shape Optimization , 2002 .

[6]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multi-point, multi-mission, high-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a long-range aircraft configuration , 2012 .

[7]  J. Yanto,et al.  Aircraft fuel burn performance study: A data-enhanced modeling approach , 2018, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[8]  Yves Gourinat,et al.  Improvement of the Aircraft Design process for Air Traffic Management evaluations , 2018 .

[9]  Eckhard Anton,et al.  Methodology for Flying Qualities Prediction and Assessment in Preliminary Aircraft Design , 2010 .

[10]  Hans-Peter Kriegel,et al.  DBSCAN Revisited, Revisited , 2017, ACM Trans. Database Syst..

[11]  Richard A. Wahls,et al.  Next Generation Civil Transport Aircraft Design Considerations for Improving Vehicle and System-Level Efficiency , 2013 .

[12]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A Python surrogate modeling framework with derivatives , 2019, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[13]  Yves Gourinat,et al.  Virtual flight testing in an aircraft sizing and optimization process , 2015 .

[14]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Single- and Multi-Point Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Using a Parallel Newton-Krylov Approach , 2009 .

[15]  Mark Drela,et al.  Pros & Cons of Airfoil Optimization , 1998 .

[16]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Surrogate models and mixtures of experts in aerodynamic performance prediction for aircraft mission analysis , 2015 .

[17]  R. Liem,et al.  Expected drag minimization for aerodynamic design optimization based on aircraft operational data , 2017 .

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A fast-prediction surrogate model for large datasets , 2018 .

[19]  Eike Stumpf,et al.  Flexibility within flight operations as an evaluation criterion for preliminary aircraft design , 2018 .