Knowledge and Innovation in China: Historical Legacies and Emerging Institutions

The purpose of this study is to provide a critical and historically grounded perspective on the institutional fabric for knowledge generation and innovative activities in Chinese society. Utilizing theoretical and methodological insights from social epistemology, it explores legacies of traditional Chinese perceptions of the utility of scientific knowledge, the balance of exploitation/exploration, the prestige of innovation, and the division of labour in knowledge production and application. It is argued that these legacies have continued to shape emerging contemporary institutions of knowledge and innovation. They contribute to tensions between the search for knowledge and requirements of power; they bias innovative activities towards exploitation; and they constrain creative entrepreneurship in the transitional innovation system.

[1]  G. Paul,et al.  Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy , 1996 .

[2]  J. Schumpeter.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[3]  N. Sivin.  Science in Ancient China: Researches and Reflections , 1995 .

[4]  E. Slingerland.  The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China , 2004 .

[5]  Bennis Wai-yip So,et al.  China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st Century , 2004 .

[6]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[7]  Jill Nemiro.  Interpretive artists: A qualitative exploration of the creative process of actors. , 1997 .

[8]  F. Bacon,et al.  The New Organon, and Related Writings , 1960 .

[9]  W. Qian.  The great inertia: Scientific stagnation in traditional China , 1985 .

[10]  P. Kuhn.  Soulstealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768 , 1991 .

[11]  Nora Jacobson.  Social Epistemology , 2007 .

[12]  Benjamin A. Elman.  On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900 , 2005 .

[13]  G. Clark.  The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the Making of the Modern World Economy (review) , 2001, Journal of Interdisciplinary History.

[14]  Jesse Fleming.  Comparative philosophy: Its aims and methods , 2003 .

[15]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[16]  Joseph Needham,et al.  Science and Civilization in China , 1955 .

[17]  A. Bahm.  Comparative philosophy : Western, Indian, and Chinese philosophies compared , 1977 .

[18]  Benjamin A. Elman.  A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China , 2000 .

[19]  C. Hansen.  Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and “Truth” , 1985, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[20]  Benjamin A. Elman.  On Their Own Terms , 2005 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[22]  D. North.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[23]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[24]  R. Baum.  Science and Culture in Contemporary China: The Roots of Retarded Modernization , 1982 .

[25]  E-tu Zen Sun,et al.  China’s Modern Economy in Historical Perspective , 1975 .

[26]  Soraj Hongladarom.  Cross-cultural epistemic practices , 2002 .

[27]  Michael J. Puett.  The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China , 2002 .

[28]  H. L. Miller.  Science and Dissent in Post-Mao China: The Politics of Knowledge , 1996 .

[29]  G. Lloyd,et al.  The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece , 2002 .

[30]  Xielin Liu,et al.  Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China’s transitional context , 2001 .

[31]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Technology, Institutions, and Economic Growth , 2005 .

[32]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea's Technological Learning , 1997 .

[33]  G. Lloyd.  Ancient worlds, modern reflections , 2004 .

[34]  Kenneth Pomeranz,et al.  The Great Divergence , 2000 .

[35]  R. Weiner.  Creativity and Beyond: Cultures, Values, and Change , 2000 .

[36]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[37]  Gérard Roland,et al.  Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions , 2004 .

[38]  N Sivin,et al.  Why the scientific revolution did not take place in China — or did it? , 1985, Chinese science.

[39]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[40]  Jin Li.  Creativity in Horizontal and Vertical Domains , 1997 .

[41]  Graham D. Burchell,et al.  The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality , 1991 .

[42]  M. Elvin.  Skills and Resources in Late Traditional China , 1975, China’s Modern Economy in Historical Perspective.

[43]  K. Hammond.  On Their Own Terms: Science in China , 2007 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[45]  A. Goldman.  Knowledge in a Social World , 1999 .

[46]  A. Frank.  The Great Divergence: Europe, China, and the Making of the Modern World Economy . By Kenneth Pomeranz. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. 382 pp. $39.95 (cloth). , 2001 .