The effect of variations in solute excretion and vasopressin dosage on the excretion of water in the dog.

It has been known for some time that osmotic diuretics may modify the effect of vasopressin on urine concentration (1, 2). However, it has been generally assumed that urine will remain hypertonic to plasma if sufficient hormone is administered irrespective of the extent of the solute diuresis. This conclusion was based on the thesis that the major action of vasopressin is to promote the elaboration of a hypertonic urine presumably by a process involving active water reabsorption. Smith (3) and Wesson and Anslow (4), on the other hand, have suggested that vasopressin increases permeability of the tubule membrane to water in the distal segment, permitting osmotic equilibration in this area, and thereby diminishing the volume of isosmotic fluid delivered to a hypothetical concentrating site in the collecting duct. The experiments to be reported were designed to reexamine in a quantitative fashion the effect of solute excretion on the renal response to purified arginine vasopressin. The data have been interpreted in the light of present information concerning the probable mode and sites of action of the hormone.

[1]  R. Berliner,et al.  Production of hypertonic urine in the absence of pituitary antidiuretic hormone. , 1957, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  L. Welt,et al.  A study of the quantitative relationship between antidiuretic hormone (vasopressin) and the renal tubular reabsorption of water. , 1957, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[3]  F. Epstein,et al.  The effect of variations in solute excretion and glomerular filtration on water diuresis. , 1956, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  J. Orloff,et al.  The renal clearance of alkali-stable inulin. , 1955, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[5]  J. D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Variation in the diurectic response to ingested water related to the renal excretion of solutes. , 1953, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  R. Berliner,et al.  Comparison of inulin and creatinine clearance in the normal dog. , 1952, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  L. Wesson,et al.  Effect of osmotic and mercurial diuresis on simultaneous water diuresis. , 1952, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  J. P. Peters,et al.  The Kidney, Structure and Function in Health and Disease , 1952, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[9]  H D LAUSON,et al.  The problem of estimating the rate of secretion of antidiuretic hormone in man. , 1951, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  G. Mudge,et al.  Effect of urea diuresis on renal excretion of electrolytes. , 1949, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  J. Shannon THE CONTROL OF THE RENAL EXCRETION OF WATER , 1942, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[12]  F. del Greco,et al.  The influence of solute excretion rate on the production of a hypotonic urine in man. , 1955, Clinical science.

[13]  L. Wesson,et al.  Effect of sustained, graded urea diuresis on water and electrolyte excretion. , 1955, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  R. Bowman,et al.  An instrument and method for rapid, dependable determination of freezing point depression. , 1954, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[15]  G. Ericson,et al.  PITUITRIN AND DIURESIS IN MAN , 1927 .