Transportation Demand Management: Promise or Panacea?

Abstract Transportation demand management (TDM) has emerged as the primary policy instrument for dealing with urban congestion problems. TDM focuses on reducing peak period traffic by attracting solo drivers to carpools or transit, shifting work schedules away from traditional peak hours, and allowing more employees to work at home. TDM programs originated as voluntary, employer-based efforts. Local and regional governments are now mandating these programs through development conditions and local ordinances. Case studies of three large-scale experiments show that these TDM efforts have had relatively small impact on traffic conditions, but the effects on workers and their households are often significant. The paper discusses the potential of TDM to solve urban congestion problems.

[1]  Abraham D. Horowitz,et al.  RIDE SHARING TO WORK: AN ATTITUDINAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[2]  D. McFadden,et al.  URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[3]  H L Anderson Work zone safety , 1978 .

[4]  Sandra Rosenbloom,et al.  Peak-period traffic congestion: A state-of-the-art analysis and evaluation of effective solutions , 1978 .

[5]  R. Gakenheimer,et al.  Urban Transportation Planning in Transition The Sources and Prospects of TSM , 1979 .

[6]  Adolf D May,et al.  DEMAND-SUPPLY MODELING FOR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT , 1980 .

[7]  Stuart W. Cook,et al.  Evaluating employer programs encouraging the use of alternate transportation modes: Two studies , 1981 .

[8]  Paul P Jovanis FLEXIBLE WORK HOURS AND MODE CHANGE: INTERPRETATION OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS FROM SAN FRANCISCO , 1981 .

[9]  J J Roark Experiences in transportation system management , 1981 .

[10]  Frederick J Wegmann,et al.  IMPACT OF FLEXITIME WORK SCHEDULES ON AN EMPLOYER-BASED RIDESHARING PROGRAM , 1983 .

[11]  F Southworth,et al.  STUDY OF CURRENT AND PLANNED HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE LANE USE: PERFORMANCE AND USE , 1985 .

[12]  T. Higgins Flexible parking requirements for office developments: New support for public parking and ridesharing , 1985 .

[13]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  Testing the limits of TSM: the 1984 Los Angeles Summer Olympics , 1987 .

[14]  R. Teal Carpooling: Who, how and why☆ , 1987 .

[15]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Factors influencing commuting choices in suburban labor markets: A case analysis of Pleasanton, California , 1988 .

[16]  S. Berry Los Angeles Today and Tomorrow: Results of the Los Angeles 2000 Community Survey , 1988 .

[17]  T F Golob,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE 1988 STAGGERED WORK HOURS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT IN HONOLULU: FINAL REPORT , 1989 .

[18]  H W Richardson,et al.  COUNTING NONWORK TRIPS: THE MISSING LINK IN TRANSPORTATION, LAND USE, AND URBAN POLICY , 1989 .

[19]  C K Orski,et al.  CAN MANAGEMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEMAND HELP SOLVE OUR GROWING TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND AIR POLLUTION PROBLEMS , 1990 .

[20]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  STAGGERED WORK HOURS FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: A CASE STUDY , 1990 .

[21]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  Impact of high occupancy vehicle lanes on carpooling behavior , 1990 .

[22]  Richard Willson,et al.  Parking subsidies and travel choices: Assessing the evidence , 1990 .

[23]  E. Ferguson Transportation Demand Management Planning, Development, and Implementation , 1990 .

[24]  Martin Wachs,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of Regulation XV of the South Coast Air Quality Management District , 1991 .

[25]  Robert Cervero Congestion, Growth and Public Choices , 1991 .

[26]  E. Ferguson Ridesharing, Firm Size, and Urban Form , 1991 .

[27]  Martin Wachs,et al.  Policy Implications of Recent Behavioral Research in Transportation Demand Management , 1991 .