Climate model bias correction and the role of timescales

Abstract. It is well known that output from climate models cannot be used to force hydrological simulations without some form of preprocessing to remove the existing biases. In principle, statistical bias correction methodologies act on model output so the statistical properties of the corrected data match those of the observations. However, the improvements to the statistical properties of the data are limited to the specific timescale of the fluctuations that are considered. For example, a statistical bias correction methodology for mean daily temperature values might be detrimental to monthly statistics. Also, in applying bias corrections derived from present day to scenario simulations, an assumption is made on the stationarity of the bias over the largest timescales. First, we point out several conditions that have to be fulfilled by model data to make the application of a statistical bias correction meaningful. We then examine the effects of mixing fluctuations on different timescales and suggest an alternative statistical methodology, referred to here as a cascade bias correction method, that eliminates, or greatly reduces, the negative effects.

[1]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  The Role of Land-Atmosphere Interactions for Climate Variability in Europe , 2008 .

[2]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. , 2007 .

[3]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Statistical Precipitation Downscaling over the Northwestern United States Using Numerically Simulated Precipitation as a Predictor , 2003 .

[4]  G. Lenderink,et al.  Increase in hourly precipitation extremes beyond expectations from temperature changes , 2008 .

[5]  J. Christensen,et al.  On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation , 2008 .

[6]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources , 2006, Science.

[7]  M. Allen,et al.  Corrigendum: Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[9]  B. Ahrens,et al.  Precipitation by a regional climate model and bias correction in Europe and South Asia , 2008 .

[10]  Ralf Toumi,et al.  A fundamental probability distribution for heavy rainfall , 2005 .

[11]  R. Leander,et al.  Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows , 2007 .

[12]  E. Fischer,et al.  Soil Moisture–Atmosphere Interactions during the 2003 European Summer Heat Wave , 2007 .

[13]  Jason C. Patton,et al.  A Possible Constraint on Regional Precipitation Intensity Changes under Global Warming , 2007 .

[14]  Arun Kumar,et al.  Long‐range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States , 2002 .

[15]  D. Maraun,et al.  Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user , 2010 .

[16]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Land–atmosphere coupling and climate change in Europe , 2006, Nature.

[17]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Heavy rain intensity distributions on varying time scales and at different temperatures , 2010 .

[18]  Lennart Bengtsson,et al.  Transient Climate Change Simulations with a Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean GCM Including the Tropospheric Sulfur Cycle , 1999 .

[19]  Remko Uijlenhoet,et al.  Changes in Streamflow Dynamics in the Rhine Basin under Three High-Resolution Regional Climate Scenarios , 2010 .

[20]  C. Frei,et al.  Downscaling from GCM precipitation: a benchmark for dynamical and statistical downscaling methods , 2006 .

[21]  S. Emori,et al.  Dynamic and thermodynamic changes in mean and extreme precipitation under changed climate , 2005 .

[22]  M. Clarkb,et al.  Use of statistically and dynamically downscaled atmospheric model output for hydrologic simulations in three mountainous basins in the western United States , 2003 .

[23]  James Hansen,et al.  Translating climate forecasts into agricultural terms: advances and challenges , 2006 .

[24]  Peter Berg,et al.  Seasonal characteristics of the relationship between daily precipitation intensity and surface temperature , 2009 .

[25]  C. Piani,et al.  Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe , 2010 .

[26]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Statistical bias correction of global simulated daily precipitation and temperature for the application of hydrological models , 2010 .

[27]  K. Trenberth,et al.  The changing character of precipitation , 2003 .

[28]  M. Déqué,et al.  Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: Model results and statistical correction according to observed values , 2007 .

[29]  M. Babel,et al.  Spatial disaggregation of bias-corrected GCM precipitation for improved hydrologic simulation: Ping River Basin, Thailand , 2007 .

[30]  Michael Botzet,et al.  Ocean Circulation and Tropical Variability in the Coupled Model ECHAM5/MPI-OM , 2006 .

[31]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[32]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[33]  D. Jacob,et al.  Klimaauswirkungen und Anpassung in Deutschland - Phase 1: Erstellung regionaler Klimaszenarien für Deutschland , 2008 .