A new model explaining the origin of different topologies in interaction networks

The architecture of interaction networks has been extensively studied in the past decades, and different topologies have been observed in natural systems. Despite several phenomenological explanations proposed, we still understand little of the mechanisms that generate those topologies. Here we present a mechanistic model based on the integrative hypothesis of specialization, which aims at explaining the emergence of topology and specialization in consumer-resource networks. By following three first-principles and adjusting five parameters, our model was able to generate synthetic weighted networks that show the main patterns of topology and specialization observed in nature. Our results prove that topology emergence is possible without network-level selection. In our simulations, the intensity of trade-offs in the performance of each consumer species on different resource species is the main factor driving network topology. We predict that interaction networks with low species diversity and low dissimilarity between resources should have a nested topology, although more diverse networks with large dissimilarity should have a compound topology. Additionally, our results highlight scale as a key factor. Our model generates predictions consistent with ecological and evolutionary theories and real-world observations. Therefore, it supports the IHS as a useful conceptual framework to study the architecture of interaction networks.

[1]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A comprehensive framework for the study of species co‐occurrences, nestedness and turnover , 2017 .

[2]  Stephen J Beckett,et al.  Improved community detection in weighted bipartite networks , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[3]  F. R. Santos,et al.  Trade-offs and resource breadth processes as drivers of performance and specificity in a host-parasite system: a new integrative hypothesis. , 2016, International journal for parasitology.

[4]  S. Valverde,et al.  Multi-scale structure and geographic drivers of cross-infection within marine bacteria and phages , 2012, The ISME Journal.

[5]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  A. Joshi,et al.  Trade-offs and the evolution of host specialization , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[7]  Paulo R. Guimarães,et al.  Interaction Intimacy Affects Structure and Coevolutionary Dynamics in Mutualistic Networks , 2007, Current Biology.

[8]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[9]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Identifying Causes of Patterns in Ecological Networks: Opportunities and Limitations , 2017 .

[10]  M. Barber Modularity and community detection in bipartite networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[12]  David Mouillot,et al.  Ectoparasitic “Jacks‐of‐All‐Trades”: Relationship between Abundance and Host Specificity in Fleas (Siphonaptera) Parasitic on Small Mammals , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Coevolutionary diversification creates nested-modular structure in phage–bacteria interaction networks , 2013, Interface Focus.

[14]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks , 2010, Science.

[15]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Origin of compartmentalization in food webs. , 2010, Ecology.

[16]  Marco Tschapka,et al.  Insights on the assembly rules of a continent-wide multilayer network , 2018, bioRxiv.

[17]  Rodolfo Dirzo,et al.  Analysis of a hyper-diverse seed dispersal network: modularity and underlying mechanisms. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[18]  Rafael Barros Pereira Pinheiro,et al.  The compound topology of a continent-wide interaction network explained by an integrative hypothesis of specialization , 2017, bioRxiv.

[19]  Erica A. Newman,et al.  Does biological intimacy shape ecological network structure? A test using a brood pollination mutualism on continental and oceanic islands , 2018, The Journal of animal ecology.

[20]  Caitlin A Stern,et al.  Not Just a Theory—The Utility of Mathematical Models in Evolutionary Biology , 2014, PLoS biology.

[21]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Analysing ecological networks of species interactions , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  The modularity of seed dispersal: differences in structure and robustness between bat– and bird–fruit networks , 2011, Oecologia.

[23]  Marco A. R. Mello,et al.  Pollination networks of oil-flowers: a tiny world within the smallest of all worlds. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[24]  Albert Solé-Ribalta,et al.  Revealing In-Block Nestedness: detection and benchmarking , 2018, Physical review. E.

[25]  Poulin Large‐scale patterns of host use by parasites of freshwater fishes , 1998 .

[26]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[27]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Macroecology of pollination networks , 2013 .

[28]  Timothée Poisot,et al.  A comparative study of ecological specialization estimators , 2012 .

[29]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[30]  David Mouillot,et al.  Phylogenetic Signal in Module Composition and Species Connectivity in Compartmentalized Host-Parasite Networks , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Evon M. O. Abu-Taieh,et al.  Comparative Study , 2020, Definitions.

[32]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[33]  Carsten F Dormann,et al.  The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant-pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes. , 2016, Annals of botany.

[34]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Ecological networks - foodwebs and beyond , 2009 .

[35]  J. Luque,et al.  A host-endoparasite network of Neotropical marine fish: are there organizational patterns? , 2011, Parasitology.

[36]  C. Horvitz,et al.  Jack of all trades masters novel host plants: positive genetic correlations in specialist and generalist insect herbivores expanding their diets to novel hosts , 2012, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[37]  Owen T Lewis,et al.  Guild-specific Patterns of Species Richness and Host Specialization in Plant–herbivore Food Webs from a Tropical Forest , 2022 .

[38]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks : beyond food webs Ecological networks – beyond food webs , 2008 .

[39]  Mário Almeida-Neto,et al.  A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[40]  D. Futuyma,et al.  The Evolution of Ecological Specialization , 1988 .

[41]  Sérgio Furtado dos Reis,et al.  The nested structure of marine cleaning symbiosis: is it like flowers and bees? , 2007, Biology Letters.

[42]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Structure in plant–animal interaction assemblages , 2006 .

[43]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Specialization, Constraints, and Conflicting Interests in Mutualistic Networks , 2007, Current Biology.

[44]  W. Armbruster,et al.  The specialization continuum in pollination systems: diversity of concepts and implications for ecology, evolution and conservation , 2017 .

[45]  Nathan Muchhala,et al.  Adaptive Trade‐Off in Floral Morphology Mediates Specialization for Flowers Pollinated by Bats and Hummingbirds , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Joshua S Weitz,et al.  Conflicting attachment and the growth of bipartite networks. , 2015, Physical review. E.

[47]  S. Valverde,et al.  Statistical structure of host–phage interactions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Network spandrels reflect ecological assembly. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[49]  H. Godfray,et al.  Food web structure of three guilds of natural enemies: predators, parasitoids and pathogens of aphids. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[50]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Introducing the bipartite Package: Analysing Ecological Networks , 2008 .

[51]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks , 2007 .

[53]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  A neutral‐niche theory of nestedness in mutualistic networks , 2008 .

[54]  J. Bronstein,et al.  How context dependent are species interactions? , 2014, Ecology letters.

[55]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Asymmetric specialization and extinction risk in plant–flower visitor webs: a matter of morphology or abundance? , 2007, Oecologia.

[56]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Sampling networks of ecological interactions , 2015, bioRxiv.

[57]  J. Thompson,et al.  The Coevolutionary Process , 1994 .

[58]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity , 2007 .

[59]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Measuring specialization in species interaction networks , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[60]  Mathias M Pires,et al.  Interaction intimacy organizes networks of antagonistic interactions in different ways , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[61]  J. Memmott,et al.  Functional group diversity increases with modularity in complex food webs , 2015, Nature Communications.

[62]  S. Bensch,et al.  A jack-of-all-trades and still a master of some: prevalence and host range in avian malaria and related blood parasites. , 2009, Ecology.