Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning

The authors examined cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning among East Asian (Chinese and Korean), Asian American, and European American university students. We investigated categorization (Studies 1 and 2), conceptual structure (Study 3), and deductive reasoning (Studies 3 and 4). In each study a cognitive conflict was activated between formal and intuitive strategies of reasoning. European Americans, more than Chinese and Koreans, set aside intuition in favor of formal reasoning. Conversely, Chinese and Koreans relied on intuitive strategies more than European Americans. Asian Americans’ reasoning was either identical to that of European Americans, or intermediate. Differences emerged against a background of similar reasoning tendencies across cultures in the absence of conflict between formal and intuitive strategies.

[1]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Learning considered within a cultural context. Confucian and Socratic approaches. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[2]  Rule-based and experience-based thinking : the cognitive consequences of intellectual traditions , 1999 .

[3]  L. Ross,et al.  The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process”, in Ed), Advances in Experimental Social New York, pp. . , 1977 .

[4]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. , 1975 .

[6]  L. Brooks,et al.  Specializing the operation of an explicit rule , 1991 .

[7]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Alternative strategies of categorization , 1998, Cognition.

[8]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Reasoning about necessity and possibility : a test of the mental model theory of deduction , 1999 .

[9]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Running Head: CULTURE AND THOUGHT Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic vs. Analytic Cognition , 2001 .

[10]  R. Revlin,et al.  The belief-bias effect in formal reasoning: The influence of knowledge on logic , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[11]  中村 元,et al.  The ways of thinking of Eastern peoples , 1960 .

[12]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[13]  S. Gelman,et al.  Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity In Cognition And Culture , 1994 .

[14]  Woo-Kyoung Ahn,et al.  A Two-Stage Model of Category Construction , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  S. Stich.  The Fragmentation Of Reason , 1990 .

[16]  L R Brooks,et al.  Perceptual manifestations of an analytic structure: the priority of holistic individuation. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Culture, gender, and self: a perspective from individualism-collectivism research. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Alexander K. Luria,et al.  Towards the Problem of the Historical Nature of Psychological Processes , 1971 .

[19]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. , 1999 .

[20]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[21]  Derk Bodde,et al.  A history of Chinese philosophy , 1937 .

[22]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty* , 2003 .

[23]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[24]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[25]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[27]  P. Pollard,et al.  On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[28]  M. Cole,et al.  The cultural context of learning and thinking. An Exploration in Experimental Anthropology. , 1971 .

[29]  L. Rips.  Similarity, typicality, and categorization , 1989 .

[30]  S. Sloman.  Feature-Based Induction , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  R. Jones.  Alternative strategies. , 1992, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[33]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning , 1992, Cognition.

[34]  F. Keil.  Mapping the mind: The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things , 1994 .

[35]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Cognition , 2002 .

[36]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Case for Rules in Reasoning , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  D. Gentner,et al.  Similarity and the development of rules , 1998, Cognition.

[38]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[39]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .

[40]  John W. Berry,et al.  Psychological Differentiation in Cross-Cultural Perspective , 1975 .

[41]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  A two-stage model of category construction ☆ , 1992 .

[42]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[43]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Situated rationalism: Biological and social preparation for learning , 1994 .

[44]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[45]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Causal Cognition , 2000 .

[46]  J. Biggs,et al.  The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences. , 1996 .

[47]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[48]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology the Effects of Belief on the Spontaneous Production of Syllogistic Conclusions , 2022 .

[49]  D. Medin,et al.  Family resemblance, conceptual cohesiveness, and category construction , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  L. P. Williams,et al.  Science and Civilization in China , 1957, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[51]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  D. K. Nelson,et al.  The effect of intention on what concepts are acquired , 1984 .

[53]  L. Ross.  The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[54]  Shu-hsien Liu.  THE USE OF ANALOGY AND SYMBOLISM IN TRADITIONAL CHINESE PHILOSOPHY , 1974 .

[55]  R. Brislin.  Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research , 1970 .

[56]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Overall similarity in adults' classification: The child in all of us. , 1984 .

[57]  U. Neisser.  The multiplicity of thought. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[58]  J Jonides,et al.  PET evidence for multiple strategies of categorization , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[59]  Ken-ichi Ohbuchi,et al.  Cultural styles of conflict management in Japanese and Americans : Passivity, covertness, and effectiveness of strategies , 1994 .

[60]  Vivian Nutton,et al.  Demystifying mentalities , 1991, Medical History.

[61]  L. Pearce Williams,et al.  Science and Civilization in China, Vol. 1 , 1955, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[62]  D. Gilbert.  How mental systems believe. , 1991 .

[63]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. , 1999 .