Current status of surgery for clinical stage IA lung cancer in Japan: analysis of the national clinical database

[1]  S. Natsugoe,et al.  Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan in 2016 , 2019, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[2]  N. Ikeda.  Updates on Minimally Invasive Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2019, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[3]  H. Miyata,et al.  Model of lung cancer surgery risk derived from a Japanese nationwide web-based database of 78 594 patients during 2014–2015† , 2017, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[4]  Noboru Motomura,et al.  Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2014 , 2016, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[5]  H. Miyata,et al.  Development of an annually updated Japanese national clinical database for chest surgery in 2014 , 2016, General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

[6]  A. Kosinski,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Lung Cancer Resection Risk Model: Higher Quality Data and Superior Outcomes. , 2016, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  National Clinical Database feedback implementation for quality improvement of cancer treatment in Japan: from good to great through transparency , 2015, Surgery Today.

[8]  W. Richards,et al.  VATS lobectomy has better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy: CALGB 31001, an ancillary analysis of CALGB 140202 (Alliance). , 2015, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[9]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Challenges and prospects of a clinical database linked to the board certification system , 2014, Surgery Today.

[10]  E. Miyaoka,et al.  Japanese Lung Cancer Registry Study of 11,663 Surgical Cases in 2004: Demographic and Prognosis Changes Over Decade , 2011, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[11]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection. , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  S. Swisher,et al.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. , 2010, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  B. Meyers,et al.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  N. Altorki,et al.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. , 2010, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  Tristan D Yan,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  D. Sugarbaker,et al.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802--a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.