Assessing the scales in numerical weather and climate predictions: will exascale be the rescue?

We discuss scientific features and computational performance of kilometre-scale global weather and climate simulations, considering the Icosahedral Non-hydrostatic (ICON) model and the Integrated Forecast System (IFS). Scalability measurements and a performance modelling approach are used to derive performance estimates for these models on upcoming exascale supercomputers. This is complemented by preliminary analyses of the model data that illustrate the importance of high-resolution models to gain improvements in the accuracy of convective processes, a better understanding of physics dynamics interactions and poorly resolved or parametrized processes, such as gravity waves, convection and boundary layer. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Multiscale modelling, simulation and computing: from the desktop to the exascale’.

[1]  Leonid Oliker,et al.  Towards Ultra-High Resolution Models of Climate and Weather , 2008, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[2]  Ramesh Subramonian,et al.  LogP: towards a realistic model of parallel computation , 1993, PPOPP '93.

[3]  Leonid Oliker,et al.  Hardware/software co‐design of global cloud system resolving models , 2011 .

[4]  Chao Li,et al.  Deep-ocean heat uptake and equilibrium climate response , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[5]  G. Zängl,et al.  The ICON (ICOsahedral Non‐hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI‐M: Description of the non‐hydrostatic dynamical core , 2015 .

[6]  N. Wedi,et al.  Increasing horizontal resolution in numerical weather prediction and climate simulations: illusion or panacea? , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  M. Baldauf,et al.  Operational Convective-Scale Numerical Weather Prediction with the COSMO Model: Description and Sensitivities , 2011 .

[8]  R. Heikes,et al.  DCMIP2016: A Review of Non-hydrostatic Dynamical Core Design and Intercomparison of Participating Models , 2017 .

[9]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  A bridging model for parallel computation , 1990, CACM.

[10]  Torsten Hoefler,et al.  Near-global climate simulation at 1 km resolution: establishing a performance baseline on 4888 GPUs with COSMO 5.0 , 2017 .

[11]  Kevin Hamilton,et al.  Numerical Resolution and Modeling of the Global Atmospheric Circulation: A Review of Our Current Understanding and Outstanding Issues , 2008 .

[12]  K.,et al.  The Community Earth System Model (CESM) large ensemble project: a community resource for studying climate change in the presence of internal climate variability , 2015 .

[13]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS , 1963 .

[14]  Hartwig Deneke,et al.  Large‐eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a comprehensive evaluation , 2017 .

[15]  H. Yashiro,et al.  Deep moist atmospheric convection in a subkilometer global simulation , 2013 .

[16]  Günther Zängl,et al.  Large eddy simulation using the general circulation model ICON , 2015 .

[17]  Renate Hagedorn,et al.  Toward a new generation of world climate research and computing facilities , 2010 .

[18]  Daniel Ruprecht,et al.  Wave propagation characteristics of Parareal , 2017, Comput. Vis. Sci..

[19]  Tom Henderson,et al.  AVEC Report: NGGPS Level-1 Benchmarks and Software Evaluation , 2015 .

[20]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  ON THE NUMERICAL INTEGRATION OF THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS OF MOTION FOR BAROCLINIC FLOW IN A CLOSED REGION , 1958 .

[21]  Peter D. Düben,et al.  Single Precision in Weather Forecasting Models: An Evaluation with the IFS , 2017 .

[22]  W. Skamarock.  Evaluating Mesoscale NWP Models Using Kinetic Energy Spectra , 2004 .

[23]  Peter Bauer,et al.  The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction , 2015, Nature.

[24]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Convective self‐aggregation feedbacks in near‐global cloud‐resolving simulations of an aquaplanet , 2015 .

[25]  Istvan Szunyogh.  Applicable Atmospheric Dynamics: Techniques for the Exploration of Atmospheric Dynamics , 2014 .

[26]  Petros Karvelis,et al.  PortWeather: A Lightweight Onboard Solution for Real-Time Weather Prediction , 2020, Sensors.

[27]  Felix Ament,et al.  Assessing the Benefits of Convection-Permitting Models by Neighborhood Verification: Examples from MAP D-PHASE , 2010 .

[28]  Nils Wedi,et al.  How does subgrid‐scale parametrization influence nonlinear spectral energy fluxes in global NWP models? , 2016 .

[29]  Hiroaki Miura,et al.  Global cloud‐system‐resolving model NICAM successfully simulated the lifecycles of two real tropical cyclones , 2008 .

[30]  Torsten Hoefler,et al.  Reflecting on the Goal and Baseline for Exascale Computing: A Roadmap Based on Weather and Climate Simulations , 2019, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[31]  Francis X. Giraldo,et al.  Current and Emerging Time-Integration Strategies in Global Numerical Weather and Climate Prediction , 2019 .

[32]  Daniel Klocke,et al.  Rediscovery of the doldrums in storm-resolving simulations over the tropical Atlantic , 2017, Nature Geoscience.

[33]  Peter V. Coveney,et al.  Multiscale computing in the exascale era , 2016, J. Comput. Sci..