The chord method for the determination of nonconvex workspaces of planar parallel manipulators

An extension of a novel optimization approach for the determination of accessible output sets of planar manipulators is presented. The optimization approach provides a general method for the determination of workspaces and has the advantage that it allows for the easy and systematic implementation of constraints acting on manipulators. The previously proposed optimization methodologies, the ray method and modified ray method, were unable to map the boundaries of non-convex planar workspaces automatically. A new chord method is proposed in this paper, which allows for the automated and efficient mapping of most non-convex workspaces. The chord method is illustrated by application to three degree of freedom planar parallel manipulators of varied geometry. Indications are that further development of the algorithm will lead to a method that allows for the completely automated determination of planar manipulator workspaces.

[1]  F. A. Adkins,et al.  Numerical Algorithms for Mapping Boundaries of Manipulator Workspaces , 1996 .

[2]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  J. Duffy,et al.  An Optimization Approach to the Determination of the Boundaries of Manipulator Workspaces , 2000 .

[4]  C. Gosselin,et al.  The optimum kinematic design of a spherical three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator , 1988 .

[5]  Jan A. Snyman,et al.  The determination of nonconvex workspaces of generally constrained planar stewart platforms , 2000 .

[6]  Tatsuo Arai,et al.  Design, analysis and construction of a prototype parallel link manipulator , 1990, EEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Towards a New Frontier of Applications.

[7]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Workspaces of Planar Parallel Manipulators , 1998 .

[8]  J. Snyman A new and dynamic method for unconstrained minimization , 1982 .

[9]  E. Haug,et al.  Workspace analysis of multibody mechanical systems using continuation methods , 1989 .

[10]  E F Fichter,et al.  A Stewart Platform- Based Manipulator: General Theory and Practical Construction , 1986 .

[11]  Jan A. Snyman,et al.  The LFOPC leap-frog algorithm for constrained optimization , 2000 .

[12]  Lukas Johannes Du Plessis An optimization approach to the determination of manipulator workspaces , 1999 .

[13]  敏男 福田,et al.  IEEE International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems '90, Towards a New Frontier of Applications, Proceedings. IROS 1990, July 3-6, 1990, Ibaraki, Japan , 1989, IROS.

[14]  N. Stander,et al.  A dynamic penalty function method for the solution of structural optimization problems , 1994 .

[15]  Edward J. Haug,et al.  ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS TO CONTROL OF MANIPULATORS WITHIN ACCESSIBLE OUTPUT SETS , 1995 .

[16]  Jan A. Snyman An improved version of the original leap-frog dynamic method for unconstrained minimization: LFOP1(b) , 1983 .