Segmentation of ultrasound images of fetal anatomic structures using random forest for low-cost settings

In ultrasound imaging, manual extraction of contours of fetal anatomic structures from echographic images have been found to be very challenging due to speckles and low contrast characteristic features. Contours extracted are therefore associated with variability of human observers. In this case, the contours that are extracted are not reproducible and hence not reliable. This challenge has called for the need to develop a method that can accurately segment the fetal anatomic structures. This will help to estimate and measure the contours of the structures of fetal bodies such as the head circumference, femur length, etc. Most recent methods are able to integrate global shape and appearance. The drawback to most of these methods is that, they are not able to handle localized appearance variations. They only rely on an assumption of Gaussian gray value distribution and also require initialization near the optimal solution. In this manuscript random forest is used to segment head contour in fetal ultrasound scans acquired in low-cost settings, such as acquisition performed in rural areas of low-income countries using low-cost portable machines.

[1]  Alessandro Crimi,et al.  Phone-based Prenatal Care for Communities and Remote Ultrasound Imaging , 2014 .

[2]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Decision Forests for Computer Vision and Medical Image Analysis , 2013, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[3]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Fetal cranial segmentation in 2D ultrasound images using shape properties of pixel clusters , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[4]  Tong Fang,et al.  Statistical region-based segmentation of ultrasound images. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[6]  S. Campbell,et al.  ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN THE ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT , 1975, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Object Class Segmentation using Random Forests , 2008, BMVC.

[8]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Segmentation of fetal ultrasound images. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  Pat Langley,et al.  Editorial: On Machine Learning , 1986, Machine Learning.

[10]  Xavier Bresson,et al.  Evaluation and Comparison of Current Fetal Ultrasound Image Segmentation Methods for Biometric Measurements: A Grand Challenge , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  Detection and Measurement of Fetal Anatomies from Ultrasound Images using a Constrained Probabilistic Boosting Tree , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  C. Lamberti,et al.  Maximum likelihood segmentation of ultrasound images with Rayleigh distribution , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Decision Forests: A Unified Framework for Classification, Regression, Density Estimation, Manifold Learning and Semi-Supervised Learning , 2012, Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis..

[14]  M. Dewal,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging and Image Segmentation in the area of Ultrasound: A Review , 2010 .