Acoustic signal amplitude patterns : A computer simulation investigation of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis

The acoustic adaptation hypothesis (AAH) predicts that vocalizations intended for unambiguous long range communication should possess amplitude modulation (AM) characteristics such that the temporal patterning of amplitude is minimally degraded (due to atmospheric turbulence and reverberation) during transmission through native habitat. Specifically, signals should possess rapid AM (trills) in open habitats and low rate AM (whistles) in closed habitats. To determine which of these amplitude patterns incurs less degradation from its two main components, reverberation and irregular amplitude fluctuations (IAFs), we constructed two synthetic 'source' signals, a rapid AM 'trill' and a low rate AM 'whistle', from pure tone frequency sweeps. We applied the degradation components independently, thus avoiding their complex interactions typical of field recordings. Signals were degraded by various echo treatments (modeling closed habitat reverberation) or by various amplitude decrease treatments (modeling open habitat IAFs). Results revealed that the difference in performance between signal types lies not so much in their average transmission quality, as in the variability of that quality. In closed habitats, whistled signals transmit with more consistent quality than trilled signals over biologically realistic echo delays. In open habitats, trilled signals transmit with far lower variability of quality than do whistled signals. The inherent redundancy of trills transmits information more effectively than whistles in open habitats. Our results show strong support for the AAH predictions regarding what type of signal structure is best suited for open or closed habitats. However, this support is based on variability in performance of signal types in different habitats rather than average transmission quality.

[1]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  The Role of Body Size, Phylogeny, and Ambient Noise in the Evolution of Bird Song , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[2]  John R. Krebs,et al.  The reaction of great tits (Parus major) to playback of degraded and undegraded songs: the effect of familiarity with the stimulus song type , 1983 .

[3]  S. Lougheed,et al.  Variation in Duration and Frequency Characters in the Song of the Rufous-Collared Sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, with Respect to Habitat, Trill Dialects and Body Size , 1991 .

[4]  M. E. Anderson,et al.  NORTHERN CARDINAL SONG IN THREE FOREST HABITATS IN EASTERN TEXAS , 1985 .

[5]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Habitat‐induced degradation of sound signals: Quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal‐to‐noise ratio in blackbird song , 1993 .

[6]  E. Date,et al.  Sound Transmission: a Basis for Dialects in Birdsong? , 1993 .

[7]  Poul Hansen.  Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation, and a hypothesis on its evolution , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  R. H. Wiley.  Associations of Song Properties with Habitats for Territorial Oscine Birds of Eastern North America , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Jorma Sorjonen,et al.  Transmission of the Two Most Characteristic Phrases of the Song of the Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia in Different Environmental Conditions , 1983 .

[10]  Song pitch ― habitat relationships in white-throated sparrows: cracks in acoustic windows? , 1988 .

[11]  S. I. Rothstein,et al.  Vocal Dialects and Their Possible Relation to Honest Status Signalling in the Brown-Headed Cowbird , 1987 .

[12]  The Association between Vocal Characteristics and Habitat Type in Taiwanese Passerines(Ecology) , 1992 .

[13]  E. Morton.  Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[14]  M. Ryan,et al.  THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION IN INTRASPECIFIC DIVERGENCE OF MATE RECOGNITION SIGNALS IN THE CRICKET FROG, ACRIS CREPITANS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  Jorma Sorjonen,et al.  Song Structure and Singing Strategies in the Genus Luscinia in Different Habitats and Geographical Areas , 1986 .

[16]  Enrique T. Segura,et al.  Geographic variation in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow in Eastern Argentina , 1993 .

[17]  E. T. Segura,et al.  Dialect Differences in the Song of Zonotrichia capensis in the Southern Pampas: A Test of the Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis , 1994 .

[18]  Charles H. Brown,et al.  Old world monkey vocalizations: adaptation to the local habitat? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  The response of Western Meadowlarks (Sturnella neglecta) to the playback of undegraded and degraded songs , 1984 .

[20]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[21]  P. Handford.  Trill rate dialects in the Rufous-collared Sparrow, Zonotrichia capensis, in northwestern Argentina , 1988 .

[22]  Jorma Sorjonen,et al.  Factors Affecting the Structure of Song and the Singing Behaviour of Some Northern European Passerine Birds , 1986 .

[23]  Eugene S. Morton,et al.  Predictions From the Ranging Hypothesis for the Evolution of Long Distance Signals in Birds , 1986 .

[24]  S. Lougheed,et al.  VOCAL DIALECTS AND THE STRUCTURE OF GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN MORPHOLOGICAL AND ALLOZYMIC CHARACTERS IN THE RUFOUS‐COLLARED SPARROW, ZONOTRICHIA CAPENSIS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  R. H. Wiley,et al.  Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Auditory distance assessment of singing conspecifies in Carolina wrens: the role of reverberation and frequency-dependent attenuation , 1995, Animal Behaviour.