An Energy Efficient Quality Adaptive Multi-Modal Sensor Framework for Context Recognition

Proliferation of mobile applications in unpredictable and changing environments requires applications to sense and act on changing operational contexts. In such environments, understanding the context of an entity is essential for adaptability of the application behavior to changing situations. In our view, context is a high-level representation of a user or entity’s state and can capture activities, relationships, capabilities, etc. Inherently, however, these high-level context measures are difficult to sense directly and instead must be inferred through the combination of many data sources. In pervasive computing environments where this context is of significant importance, a multitude of sensors is already being embedded in the environment to provide streams of low-level sensor data about the environment and the entities present in that environment. A key challenge in supporting context-aware applications in these environments, therefore, is supporting energy-efficient determination of multiple (potentially competing) high-level context measures simultaneously using data from low-level sensor streams. In this paper, we first highlight the key challenges that distinguish the multi-context determination problem from single context determination and then develop our framework and practical implementation to account for them. Our model captures the tradeoff between the accuracy of estimating multiple context measures and the overhead incurred in acquiring the necessary sensor data. Given a set of required contexts to determine, we develop a multi-context search heuristic to compute both the best set of sensors to contribute to context determination and parameters of the sensing tasks. Our algorithm’s goal is to satisfy the applications’ specified needs for accuracy at a minimum cost. We compare the performance of our heuristic approach with a brute-force approach for multi-context determination. Experimental results with SunSPOT sensors demonstrate the potential impact of this approach.

[1]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Offering a Precision-Performance Tradeoff for Aggregation Queries over Replicated Data , 2000, VLDB.

[2]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Maximum Mutual Information Principle for Dynamic Sensor Query Problems , 2003, IPSN.

[3]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Collaborative In-Network Processing for Target Tracking , 2003, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[4]  Amy L. Murphy,et al.  Middleware to support sensor network applications , 2004, IEEE Network.

[5]  G. Pottie,et al.  Entropy-based sensor selection heuristic for target localization , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[6]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Detection and Fusion in a Large Wireless Sensor Network of Random Size , 2005, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[7]  Wei Hong,et al.  Model-based approximate querying in sensor networks , 2005, The VLDB Journal.

[8]  Jianliang Xu,et al.  Extending Network Lifetime for Precision-Constrained Data Aggregation in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Context-aware mobile computing: learning context- dependent personal preferences from a wearable sensor array , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[10]  Archan Misra,et al.  CAPS: energy-efficient processing of continuous aggregate queries in sensor networks , 2006, Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PERCOM'06).

[11]  Mani Srivastava,et al.  A Framework for Quality of Information Analysis for Detection-Oriented Sensor Network Deployments , 2007 .

[12]  George Michailidis,et al.  Local Vote Decision Fusion for Target Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Christine Julien,et al.  Quality-of-inference (QoINF)-aware context determination in assisted living environments , 2009, WiMD '09.

[14]  O. D. Amft On the need for quality standards in activity recognition using ubiquitous sensors , 2010 .