Risk Perception and Information Processing: The Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Self‐Reported Information Processing

The role of information processing in understanding people's responses to risk information has recently received substantial attention. One limitation of this research concerns the unavailability of a validated questionnaire of information processing. This article presents two studies in which we describe the development and validation of the Information-Processing Questionnaire to meet that need. Study 1 describes the development and initial validation of the questionnaire. Participants were randomized to either a systematic processing or a heuristic processing condition after which they completed a manipulation check and the initial 15-item questionnaire and again two weeks later. The questionnaire was subjected to factor reliability and validity analyses on both measurement times for purposes of cross-validation of the results. A two-factor solution was observed representing a systematic processing and a heuristic processing subscale. The resulting scale showed good reliability and validity, with the systematic condition scoring significantly higher on the systematic subscale and the heuristic processing condition significantly higher on the heuristic subscale. Study 2 sought to further validate the questionnaire in a field study. Results of the second study corresponded with those of Study 1 and provided further evidence of the validity of the Information-Processing Questionnaire. The availability of this information-processing scale will be a valuable asset for future research and may provide researchers with new research opportunities.

[1]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[3]  Alexander Basilevsky,et al.  Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods , 1994 .

[4]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Chris M. R. Smerecnik,et al.  Understanding the Positive Effects of Graphical Risk Information on Comprehension: Measuring Attention Directed to Written, Tabular, and Graphical Risk Information , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[7]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Persuasion by a Single Route: A View From the Unimodel , 1999 .

[8]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Affect and Implicit Associations: Implications for Risk Perception , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Information Processing and Risk Perception: An Adaptation of the Heuristic-Systematic Model , 2002 .

[11]  Weixuan Yang,et al.  Design and Analysis of Nanotube-Based Memory Cells , 2008, Nanoscale Research Letters.

[12]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[13]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[14]  R. Meertens,et al.  Audiovisual risk communication unravelled: effects on gut feelings and cognitive processes , 2008 .

[15]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  The history of dual-process notions, and the future of preconscious control. , 1999 .

[16]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Linking the Heuristic-Systematic Model and Depth of Processing , 2002, Commun. Res..

[17]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Studying Heuristic‐Systematic Processing of Risk Communication , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[19]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[20]  E. Waclawski Health Measurement Scales—A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use , 2010 .

[21]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. , 1999, Environmental research.

[22]  A. Basilevsky Statistical Factor Analysis and Related Methods: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[23]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Lola L. Lopes The Rhetoric of Irrationality , 1991 .

[25]  J. Pligt,et al.  Evaluating a dual-process model of risk: affect and cognition as determinants of risky choice , 2009 .

[26]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Cognitive Effects of a Structural Overview in a Hypertext , 1999, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Michael Eid,et al.  Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences , 1999 .

[28]  Craig W. Trumbo,et al.  Heuristic-Systematic Information Processing and Risk Judgment , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[29]  H. Paek,et al.  Information Processing of Genetically Modified Food Messages Under Different Motives: An Adaptation of the Multiple‐Motive Heuristic‐Systematic Model , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  Gerjo Kok,et al.  The Effect of Graphic Organizers on Subjective and Objective Comprehension of a Health Education Text , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[31]  Rik Pieters,et al.  "Neiging tot nadenken": Samenhang met beredeneerd gedrag. , 1987 .

[32]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[33]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement , 1990 .

[34]  W. Kintsch The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .

[35]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.