Hand aperture patterns in prehension.

Although variations in the standard prehensile pattern can be found in the literature, these alternative patterns have never been studied systematically. This was the goal of the current paper. Ten participants picked up objects with a pincer grip. Objects (3, 5, or 7cm in diameter) were placed at 30, 60, 90, or 120cm from the hands' starting location. Usually the hand was opened gradually to a maximum immediately followed by hand closing, called the standard hand opening pattern. In the alternative opening patterns the hand opening was bumpy, or the hand aperture stayed at a plateau before closing started. Two participants in particular delayed the start of grasping with respect to start of reaching, with the delay time increasing with object distance. For larger object distances and smaller object sizes, the bumpy and plateau hand opening patterns were used more often. We tentatively concluded that the alternative hand opening patterns extended the hand opening phase, to arrive at the appropriate hand aperture at the appropriate time to close the hand for grasping the object. Variations in hand opening patterns deserve attention because this might lead to new insights into the coordination of reaching and grasping.

[1]  Volker H Franz,et al.  Corrective Processes in Grasping After Perturbations of Object Size , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[2]  Jinsung Wang,et al.  Coordination among the body segments during reach-to-grasp action involving the trunk , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[4]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Updating the programming of a precision grip is a function of recent history of available feedback , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Changes in grasping kinematics due to different start postures of the hand. , 2009, Human movement science.

[6]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  James R. Tresilian,et al.  A simple rule of thumb for elegant prehension , 2001, Current Biology.

[8]  R. J. Bootsma,et al.  Coordination in prehension Information-based coupling of reaching and grasping , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[10]  Eli Brenner,et al.  On the relation between object shape and grasping kinematics. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Chapter 17 The use of time-to-contact information for the initiation of hand closure in natural prehension , 2004 .

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Parallel, interdependent channels for location and orientation in sensorimotor transformations for reaching and grasping. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Reach-to-grasp movements during obstacle avoidance , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  M Desmurget,et al.  Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Coordinated responses following mechanical perturbation of the arm during prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Influence of object position and size on human prehension movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an Altered aperture , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  A. Wing,et al.  The Contribution of the Thumb to Reaching Movements , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  J. R. Bloedel,et al.  Grasping component alterations and limb transport , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  George E. Stelmach,et al.  Spatial and temporal control of trunk-assisted prehensile actions , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Temporal coupling between transport and grasp components during prehension movements: effects of visual perturbation , 1992, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  K. Newell,et al.  Body scale and the development of prehension. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[27]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[28]  U. Castiello,et al.  The reach-to-grasp movement in Parkinson’s disease before and after dopaminergic medication , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  H. Hecht,et al.  Time-to-contact , 2004 .

[30]  Maurizio Gentilucci,et al.  Grasping an object naturally or with a tool: are these tasks guided by a common motor representation? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  M. Prior,et al.  The reach-to-grasp movement in children with autism spectrum disorder. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  S. Vogt,et al.  Multijoint grasping movements , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Miya K. Rand,et al.  Effect of speed manipulation on the control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[35]  Christine L. MacKenzie,et al.  Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task , 1990 .

[36]  Raoul M. Bongers Do Changes in Movements after Tool Use Depend on Body Schema or Motor Learning? , 2010, EuroHaptics.

[37]  Alan Wing,et al.  Coordination of hand aperture with the spatial path of hand transport , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  P J Beek,et al.  Evidence for a phase transition in the early development of prehension. , 1998, Developmental psychobiology.

[40]  U. Castiello The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  G. E. Stelmach,et al.  Prehension with trunk assisted reaching , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  Miya K. Rand,et al.  Quantitative model of transport-aperture coordination during reach-to-grasp movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Movement characteristics of upper extremity prostheses during basic goal-directed tasks. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[44]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  A neural network simulating human reach-grasp coordination by continuous updating of vector positioning commands , 2003, Neural Networks.

[45]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[46]  C. V. D. Kamp,et al.  Prehension is really reaching and grasping , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Alterations in transport path differentially affect temporal and spatial movement parameters , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Studies in perception and action : posters presented at the VIth International Conference on Event Perception and Action , 1991 .