Viscosity and Density Measurements Using Mechanical Oscillators in Oil and Gas Applications

Real-time monitoring of wellbore fluids is of crucial importance for oil recovery. During various operations such as drilling, production, stimulation, and intervention, the characteristics of the fluids being produced or injected into the well needs to be monitored to ensure safe operation or to optimize production. However, measuring their physical properties, such as viscosity and density, can still pose a great challenge when the fluids are part of a multiphase flow or are complex inhomogeneous fluids whose properties can vary largely with external parameters such as temperature, pressure, and flow rates. While commercial instruments that make comparable measurements can be found in other industries, a solution tailored to these oilfield challenges does not exist at the moment. In this paper, we demonstrate two examples of viscosity/density systems using tuning fork-based mechanical oscillators tailored to different measurement scenarios in the oilfield. In the first example, we use a miniature piezoelectric tuning fork which can be integrated in small-scale measurement platforms for downhole deployment. By using the tuning fork as the frequency-defining element of an oscillator circuit, fast measurements of viscosity and density are possible. This feature allows us to use this device in fast changing multiphase flows, such as those found in live producing wells. In the second example, we demonstrate a ruggedized tuning fork device for in-line measurements of viscosity and density of non-Newtonian fluids. This instrument is a robust permanent tool for surface installation with applications in quality assessment of drilling mud and other wellbore fluids. We discuss some initial studies in a water-based drilling fluid.

[1]  Oliver C. Mullins,et al.  DOWNHOLE VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT: REVEALING RESERVOIR FLUID COMPLEXITIES AND ARCHITECTURE , 2014 .

[2]  M. Zamora,et al.  Determining Mud Rheology For Optimum Hydraulics , 2005 .

[3]  Adam S. Coutee,et al.  Guidelines for Polymer Flooding Evaluation and Development , 2007 .

[4]  Max Deffenbaugh,et al.  An untethered sensor for well logging , 2017, 2017 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[5]  Guilherme N M Ferreira,et al.  Acoustic wave biosensors: physical models and biological applications of quartz crystal microbalance. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[6]  Jonathan Mitchell,et al.  How Viscoelastic Polymer Flooding Enhances Displacement Efficiency , 2015 .

[7]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Simultaneous frequency and dissipation factor QCM measurements of biomolecular adsorption and cell adhesion. , 1997, Faraday discussions.

[8]  Krim,et al.  Damping of a crystal oscillator by an adsorbed monolayer and its relation to interfacial viscosity. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[9]  M. Deffenbaugh,et al.  Downhole viscosity measurement platform using tuning fork oscillators , 2015, 2015 IEEE SENSORS.

[10]  Ali Karimi Vajargah,et al.  Determination of drilling fluid rheology under downhole conditions by using real-time distributed pressure data , 2015 .

[11]  Kerem Durdag,et al.  Real-Time Viscosity Measurement for Condition-Based Monitoring Using Solid-State Viscosity Sensor , 2008 .

[12]  Thomas Kruspe,et al.  A New Sensor for Viscosity and Fluid Density Measurement at High Temperature and High Pressure in a Wireline and LWD Tool , 2014 .

[13]  E. Windhab,et al.  Rheological study of concentrated suspensions in pressure-driven shear flow using a novel in-line ultrasound Doppler method , 2002 .

[14]  J. R. Owers-Bradley,et al.  Vibrating Wire Viscometers in High Magnetic Fields , 1998 .

[15]  Leonid Matsiev,et al.  Multiparameteric Oil Condition Sensor Based on the Tuning Fork Technology for Automotive Applications , 2005 .

[16]  J. L. Sánchez-Rojas,et al.  Application of quartz tuning forks and extensional microresonators for viscosity and density measurements in oil/fuel mixtures , 2014 .

[17]  B. Jakoby,et al.  Viscosity sensors for engine oil condition monitoring—Application and interpretation of results , 2005 .

[18]  Colm P. O'Donnell,et al.  Process viscometry for the food industry , 2000 .

[19]  D. Rugar,et al.  Frequency modulation detection using high‐Q cantilevers for enhanced force microscope sensitivity , 1991 .

[20]  B. Jakoby,et al.  An automotive engine oil viscosity sensor , 2003 .

[21]  M. Deffenbaugh,et al.  Fast downhole fluid viscosity and density measurements using a self-oscillating tuning fork device , 2017, 2017 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[22]  Silviu Livescu,et al.  Mathematical modeling of thixotropic drilling mud and crude oil flow in wells and pipelines—A review , 2012 .

[23]  Roberto Maglione,et al.  Optimal determination of rheological parameters for Herschel-Bulkley drilling fluids and impact on pressure drop, velocity profiles and penetration rates during drilling , 2006 .

[24]  Minoru Toda,et al.  The influence of oil density and viscosity on the behavior of a lithium niobate tuning fork cantilever , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[25]  U. Schmid,et al.  Piezoelectric MEMS resonator-based oscillator for density and viscosity sensing , 2014 .

[26]  Yi Liu,et al.  Measurement of density and viscosity of dodecane and decane with a piezoelectric tuning fork over 298–448 K and 0.1–137.9 MPa , 2011 .

[27]  M. Vellekoop,et al.  Physical sensors for water-in-oil emulsions , 2004 .