Surgical protocols for early implant placement in post-extraction sockets: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the best timing for placing implants after tooth extraction, by comparing early vs. delayed implant placement and evaluating the hard and/or soft tissue ridge dimensional changes and the outcomes related with implant survival and prosthesis success. MATERIAL AND METHODS An online search of the main databases including The National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE via Pubmed), Embase and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted up to February 2011. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies and case-control retrospective studies, with a follow-up of at least 1 month after loading of dental implants, comparing: (i) early vs. delayed implant placement, (ii) augmentation vs. no augmentation at implant placement in early placed implants and/or (iii) the comparison of various augmentation procedures at early implant placement, were conducted. A hand search of relevant journals was also performed. Screening of eligible studies, assessment of their methodological quality and data extraction were conducted in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Authors of studies were contacted for clarification or missing information. RESULTS Eight studies were included, although meta-analysis could only be performed with the data from two studies comparing early vs. delayed implant. The percentage of bone height and bone width reduction favoured the early placement, with pooled mean difference between groups of 13.11% (95% CI: from 3.83 to 22.4; P = 0.057) and 19.85% (95% CI: from 13.85 to 25.81) respectively. Implant survival demonstrated a non-significant higher implant survival rate for the early group (RR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.96-1.1).With regard to patient satisfaction, statistically significant differences between the groups in favour of the early group for overall satisfaction and appearance with the restoration were demonstrated at 2 years, although these differences were lost at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Placement of dental implants at an early timing after tooth extraction may offer advantages in terms of soft and hard tissue preservation, when compared with a delayed protocol. Nevertheless, well-designed, high quality, randomized clinical trials, are needed, because the available evidence is today limited in terms of available studies and quality.

[1]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  D. E. Slot,et al.  Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  Urs C Belser,et al.  Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction. , 2011, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  M. Esposito,et al.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants). , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  J. Cosyn,et al.  Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth. , 2009, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, PloS one.

[8]  U. Belser,et al.  Early implant placement following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: biologic rationale and surgical procedures. , 2008, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[9]  U. Belser,et al.  Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[10]  L. Schropp,et al.  Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction following full-flap elevation for early and delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a 5-year randomized study. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  S. Paraskevas,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analyses on C-reactive protein in relation to periodontitis. , 2008, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[12]  E. Elm,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, The Lancet.

[13]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  K. Rungcharassaeng,et al.  Effects of the facial osseous defect morphology on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration: 1-year results. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[15]  Myron Nevins,et al.  A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[16]  Ann Wenzel,et al.  Interproximal papilla levels following early versus delayed placement of single-tooth implants: a controlled clinical trial. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[18]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. , 2005, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[19]  A. Barone,et al.  Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. , 2004, Journal of periodontology.

[20]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. , 2004, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[23]  J. Jones,et al.  Meta-analysis of periodontal disease and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[24]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. , 2003, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[25]  Z. Artzi,et al.  Healing of marginal defects at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or after 4-6 weeks of healing. A comparative study. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[26]  Z. Artzi,et al.  Comparative study of buccal dehiscence defects in immediate, delayed, and late maxillary implant placement with collagen membranes: clinical healing between placement and second-stage surgery. , 2002, Journal of periodontology.

[27]  P. Coulthard,et al.  Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of oral implants. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[29]  M. Ahmed,et al.  The immediate replacement of teeth by dental implants using homologous bone membranes to seal the sockets: clinical and radiographic findings. , 2000, Clinical oral implants research.

[30]  Z. Artzi,et al.  Healing of dehiscence defects at delayed-immediate implant sites primarily closed by a rotated palatal flap following extraction. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  N. Zitzmann,et al.  Factors influencing the success of GBR. Smoking, timing of implant placement, implant location, bone quality and provisional restoration. , 1999, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[32]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[33]  T Jemt,et al.  Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. , 1997, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[34]  Y. Ayukawa,et al.  Abscess formation around a hydroxyapatite-coated implant placed into the extraction socket with autogenous bone graft. A histological study using light microscopy, image processing, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[35]  B. Rosenquist,et al.  Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: implant survival. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[36]  R. Caffesse,et al.  A comparison of demineralized freeze-dried bone and autologous bone to induce bone formation in human extraction sockets. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[37]  J. Cornwell,et al.  Monte Carlo Comparisons of Three Tests for Homogeneity of Independent Correlations , 1993 .

[38]  J. Kent,et al.  Placement of endosseous implants into tooth extraction sites. , 1991, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[39]  R. Yukna Clinical comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets and healed sites. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[40]  D. E. Smith,et al.  Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[41]  V. Bykerk,et al.  Consensus Statement , 2004, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies.

[42]  W. G. Cochran Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests , 1954 .

[43]  N. Lang,et al.  A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[44]  G. Huynh-Ba,et al.  Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[45]  Daniel Buser,et al.  Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[46]  U. Belser,et al.  Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[47]  Urs C. Belser,et al.  Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. , 2009, Journal of periodontology.

[48]  P. Fugazzotto,et al.  Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months. , 2005, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[49]  C. Hämmerle,et al.  Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[50]  C. Hämmerle,et al.  Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[51]  Ross Se,et al.  The use of the Ross implant in an immediate extraction site. , 1989 .