Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.

Several methods exist for weight of evidence calculations on DNA mixtures. Especially if dropout is a possibility, it may be difficult to estimate mixture specific parameters needed for the evaluation. For semi-continuous models, the LR for a person to have contributed to a mixture depends on the specified number of contributors and the probability of dropout for each. We show here that, for the semi-continuous model that we consider, the weight of evidence can be accurately obtained by applying the standard statistical technique of integrating the likelihood ratio against the parameter likelihoods obtained from the mixture data. This method takes into account all likelihood ratios belonging to every choice of parameters, but LR's belonging to parameters that provide a better explanation to the mixture data put in more weight into the final result. We therefore avoid having to estimate the number of contributors or their probabilities of dropout, and let the whole evaluation depend on the mixture data and the allele frequencies, which is a practical advantage as well as a gain in objectivity. Using simulated mixtures, we compare the LR obtained in this way with the best informed LR, i.e., the LR using the parameters that were used to generate the data, and show that results obtained by integration of the LR approximate closely these ideal values. We investigate both contributors and non-contributors for mixtures with various numbers of contributors. For contributors we always obtain a result close to the best informed LR whereas non-contributors are excluded more strongly if a smaller dropout probability is imposed for them. The results therefore naturally lead us to reconsider what we mean by a contributor, or by the number of contributors.

[1]  J. Mortera,et al.  Analysis of forensic DNA mixtures with artefacts , 2013, 1302.4404.

[2]  K. Slooten Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  Utilising allelic dropout probabilities estimated by logistic regression in casework. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  John Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting low template DNA profiles. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[5]  Niels Morling,et al.  Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  D. Balding Evaluation of mixed-source, low-template DNA profiles in forensic science , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Adele A. Mitchell,et al.  Estimating the number of contributors to two-, three-, and four-person mixtures containing DNA in high template and low template amounts , 2011, Croatian medical journal.

[8]  Niels Morling,et al.  Statistical model for degraded DNA samples and adjusted probabilities for allelic drop-out. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  Silvia Bozza Discussion on the paper by Cowell, Graversen, Lauritzen and Mortera (Analysis of forensic DNA mixtures with artefacts) , 2015 .

[10]  Hinda Haned,et al.  Estimating the Number of Contributors to Forensic DNA Mixtures: Does Maximum Likelihood Perform Better Than Maximum Allele Count? , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  F Taroni,et al.  Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[12]  Ivo Alberink,et al.  Uncertainty and LR: to integrate or not to integrate, that’s the question , 2016 .

[13]  Titia Sijen,et al.  Comparing six commercial autosomal STR kits in a large Dutch population sample. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Dismissal of the illusion of uncertainty in the assessment of a likelihood ratio , 2016 .

[15]  James Curran,et al.  Population-specific FST values for forensic STR markers: A worldwide survey. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[16]  Niels Morling,et al.  Allelic drop-out probabilities estimated by logistic regression--further considerations and practical implementation. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[17]  David J Balding,et al.  Evaluation of low-template DNA profiles using peak heights , 2016, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[18]  Peter Gill,et al.  Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains. , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[19]  D. Balding,et al.  Choice of population database for forensic DNA profile analysis , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[20]  H Haned,et al.  Exploratory data analysis for the interpretation of low template DNA mixtures. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[21]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[22]  K. Kidd,et al.  Progress toward an efficient panel of SNPs for ancestry inference. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[23]  A. M. Turing,et al.  Studies in the History of Probability and Statistics. XXXVII , 1979 .

[24]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Lab Retriever: a software tool for calculating likelihood ratios incorporating a probability of drop-out for forensic DNA profiles , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[25]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[26]  Thore Egeland,et al.  Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures , 2015, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[27]  K. Slooten Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[28]  Duncan Taylor,et al.  The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.