Safer drug use in primary care - a pilot intervention study to identify improvement needs and make agreements for change in five Swedish primary care units

BackgroundThere is an urgent need to improve patient safety in the area of medication treatment among the elderly. The aim of this study was to explore which improvement needs and strengths, relating to medication safety, arise from a multi-professional intervention in primary care and further to describe and follow up on the agreements for change that were established within the intervention.MethodsThe SÄKLÄK project was a multi-professional intervention in primary care consisting of self-assessment, peer-review, feedback and written agreements for change. Data were obtained from five primary care units randomised to the intervention group. Reviewer feedback reports and agreements for change were analysed using content analysis.ResultsStrengths that were identified included a committed leadership, work methods to enhance medication safety and access to consultants. Methods for securing an accurate medication list, knowledge and methods of working of the prescriber and patient’s ability to contribute to medication safety were areas that gave rise to three predesigned categories for improvement needs on a local level. Another category became apparent during the analysis; namely learning from mistakes and from results. In all categories, apparent shortcomings were identified. These included inaccurate medication lists, lack of medication reconciliation, lack of time for follow-up of elderly patients, need for further education in geriatrics and pharmacotherapy and lack of information on indication and maximum dosage. An increased number of medication reviews were among the most common agreements for change seen.ConclusionsThis study identified substantial shortcomings, like poorly updated medication lists, which affected medication safety in the participating Swedish primary care units. Similar shortcomings are most likely present in other primary care units in the country. Working together multi-professionally, including performing medication reviews, could be one way of improving medication safety. On the other hand, the individual physician must possess enough pharmaceutical knowledge and the working conditions must allow time for follow-up of prescriptions. Strengths of the primary care unit, such as successful methods of working, must be taken advantage of. The culture in primary care may affect the ability to successfully implement routines that improve patient safety and reduce risk of medication errors.

[1]  H. Rutberg,et al.  [Errors in the pharmaceutical and prescription lists are very common. Patient data on prescriptions compared with medical records and prescription database]. , 2012, Lakartidningen.

[2]  Tommy Eriksson,et al.  Medication errors when transferring elderly patients between primary health care and hospital care , 2005, Pharmacy World and Science.

[3]  P. Höglund,et al.  Impact of the Lund Integrated Medicines Management (LIMM) model on medication appropriateness and drug-related hospital revisits , 2011, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[4]  Wanzhu Tu,et al.  Adherence: Comparison of Methods to Assess Medication Adherence and Classify Nonadherence , 2009, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[5]  E. Höög,et al.  Healthcare system intervention for prevention of birth injuries – process evaluation of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[6]  A. Viera,et al.  Medication documentation in a primary care network serving North Carolina medicaid patients: results of a cross-sectional chart review , 2012, BMC Family Practice.

[7]  P. Höglund,et al.  Medication report reduces number of medication errors when elderly patients are discharged from hospital , 2007, Pharmacy World & Science.

[8]  S. Ruths,et al.  Multidisciplinary intervention to identify and resolve drug-related problems in Norwegian nursing homes , 2010, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[9]  G. Torisson,et al.  Multidisciplinary intervention reducing readmissions in medical inpatients: a prospective, non-randomized study , 2013, Clinical interventions in aging.

[10]  Richard L Prince,et al.  Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Timing of preoperative antibiotics for knee arthroplasties: Improving the routines in Sweden , 2011, Patient safety in surgery.

[12]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  Educating medical trainees on medication reconciliation: a systematic review , 2015, BMC medical education.

[14]  M. Ghaleb,et al.  Safety of medication use in primary care , 2015, The International journal of pharmacy practice.

[15]  L. Strand,et al.  Drug-Related Problems: Their Structure and Function , 1990, DICP : the annals of pharmacotherapy.

[16]  P. Midlöv,et al.  Effects of a pharmacist-led structured medication review in primary care on drug-related problems and hospital admission rates: a randomized controlled trial , 2014, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[17]  P. Midlöv,et al.  Healthcare system intervention for safer use of medicines in elderly patients in primary care—a qualitative study of the participants’ perceptions of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change , 2015, BMC Family Practice.

[18]  A. Vogelsmeier,et al.  Medication reconciliation: A qualitative analysis of clinicians' perceptions. , 2013, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[19]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Whose Job Is It Anyway? Swedish General Practitioners’ Perception of Their Responsibility for the Patient’s Drug List , 2010, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[20]  Marjolein Lugtenberg,et al.  Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitioners , 2011, BMC family practice.

[21]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[22]  P. Midlöv,et al.  Improving the Quality of Pharmacotherapy in Elderly Primary Care Patients Through Medication Reviews: A Randomised Controlled Study , 2013, Drugs & Aging.

[23]  C. Fernández-Llamazares,et al.  Medication reconciliation: passing phase or real need? , 2012, International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.

[24]  H. Beijer,et al.  Hospitalisations caused by adverse drug reactions (ADR): a meta-analysis of observational studies , 2002, Pharmacy World and Science.

[25]  B. Lundman,et al.  Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. , 2004, Nurse education today.

[26]  Ž. Reiner,et al.  Physicians' perception, knowledge and awareness of cardiovascular risk factors and adherence to prevention guidelines: the PERCRO-DOC survey. , 2010, Atherosclerosis.