The Architecture of the Connective Tissue in the Musculoskeletal System—An Often Overlooked Functional Parameter as to Proprioception in the Locomotor Apparatus

The architecture of the connective tissue, including structures such as fasciae, sheaths, and membranes, is more important for understanding functional meaning than is more traditional anatomy, whose anatomical dissection method neglects and denies the continuity of the connective tissue as integrating matrix of the body. The connective tissue anatomy and architecture exhibits two functional tendencies that are present in all areas of the body in different ways and relationships. In body cavities, the “disconnecting” quality of shaping space enables mobility; between organs and body parts, the “connecting” dimension enables functional mechanical interactions. In the musculoskeletal system, those two features of the connective tissue are also present. They cannot be found by the usual analytic dissection procedures. An architectural description is necessary. This article uses such a methodologic approach and gives such a description for the lateral elbow region. The result is an alternative architectural view of the anatomic substrate involved in the transmission and conveyance of forces over synovial joints. An architectural description of the muscular and connective tissue organized in series with each other to enable the transmission of forces over these dynamic entities is more appropriate than is the classical concept of “passive” force-guiding structures such as ligaments organized in parallel to actively force-transmitting structures such as muscles with tendons. The discrimination between so-called joint receptors and muscle receptors is an artificial distinction when function is considered. Mechanoreceptors, also the so-called muscle receptors, are arranged in the context of force circumstances—that is, of the architecture of muscle and connective tissue rather than of the classical anatomic structures such as muscle, capsules, and ligaments. In the lateral cubital region of the rat, a spectrum of mechanosensitive substrate occurs at the transitional areas between regular dense connective tissue layers and the muscle fascicles organized in series with them. This substrate exhibits features of type and location of the mechanosensitive nerve terminals that usually are considered characteristic for “joint receptors” as well as for “muscle receptors.” The receptors for proprioception are concentrated in those areas where tensile stresses are conveyed over the elbow joint. Structures cannot be divided into either joint receptors or muscle receptors when muscular and collagenous connective tissue structures function in series to maintain joint integrity and stability. In vivo, those connective tissue structures are strained during movements of the skeletal parts, those movements in turn being induced and led by tension in muscular tissue. In principle, because of the architecture, receptors can also be stimulated by changes in muscle tension without skeletal movement, or by skeletal movement without change in muscle tension. A mutual relationship exists between structure (and function) of the mechanoreceptors and the architecture of the muscular and regular dense connective tissue. Both are instrumental in the coding of proprioceptive information to the central nervous system.

[1]  D. McCloskey Kinesthetic sensibility. , 1978, Physiological reviews.

[2]  S. Skoglund Joint Receptors and Kinaesthesis , 1973 .

[3]  D. Tracey,et al.  Joint receptors and the control of movement , 1980, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  K. Andres,et al.  Nerve fibres and their terminals of the dura mater encephali of the rat , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[5]  F. Richmond,et al.  What are the proprioceptors of the neck? , 1979, Progress in brain research.

[6]  P. Matthews Where does Sherrington's "muscular sense" originate? Muscles, joints, corollary discharges? , 1982, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  E. Blechschmidt,et al.  The Ontogenetic Basis of Human Anatomy: A Biodynamic Approach to Development from Conception to Birth , 2004 .

[8]  F. Varela,et al.  The organ of form: towards a theory of biological shape , 1987 .

[9]  K. Andres,et al.  Sensory innervation of the Achilles tendon by group III and IV afferent fibers , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[10]  F. Richmond,et al.  Anatomical organization and sensory receptor content of soft tissues surrounding upper cervical vertebrae in the cat. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  P. Grigg,et al.  Joint-position sense after total hip replacement. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  W. D. Letbetter,et al.  Anatomy and innervation patterns of cat lateral gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles. , 1982, The American journal of anatomy.

[13]  Robert Schleip,et al.  Fascial plasticity – a new neurobiological explanation Part 2 , 2003 .

[14]  W. Ferrell Discharge Characteristics of Joint Receptors in Relation to their Proprioceptive Role , 1988 .

[15]  A. English Limbs vs. Jaws: Can They Be Compared? , 1985 .

[16]  W. D. Letbetter,et al.  A histochemical analysis of identified compartments of cat lateral gastrocnemius muscle , 1982, The Anatomical record.

[17]  A. Rossi,et al.  Characteristics of hip joint mechanoreceptors in the cat. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Z. Halata,et al.  The ultrastructure of sensory nerve endings in the human knee joint capsule , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[19]  D. Barker,et al.  The Morphology of Muscle Receptors , 1974 .

[20]  G. Loeb Motoneurone task groups: coping with kinematic heterogeneity. , 1985, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Position sense following surgical removal of joints in man. , 1973, Brain research.

[22]  The effect of digital nerve block on position sense at the proximal interphalangeal joint of the human index finger , 1987, Brain Research.

[23]  D. McCloskey,et al.  The role of joint receptors in human kinaesthesia when intramuscular receptors cannot contribute. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  D. Stilwell,et al.  The innervation of deep structures of the foot. , 1957, The American journal of anatomy.

[25]  J. C. van der Wal,et al.  The organization of the substrate of proprioception in the elbow region of the rat , 1988 .

[26]  B. Wyke,et al.  The innervation of the ankle joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat. , 1967, Acta Anatomica.

[27]  Bruce Elliot Hirsch,et al.  Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice , 2009 .

[28]  B. Wyke,et al.  The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat. , 1967, Journal of anatomy.

[29]  F. J. Clark Information signaled by sensory fibers in medial articular nerve. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Z. Halata,et al.  Topography and ultrastructure of sensory nerve endings in the joint capsules of the Kowari (Dasyuroides byrnei), an Australian marsupial , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[31]  B. Wyke,et al.  Articular reflexes at the ankle joint: An electromyogrphic study of normal and abnormal influences of ankle‐joint mechanoreceptors upon reflex activity in the leg muscles , 1967, The British journal of surgery.

[32]  D. Stilwell,et al.  The innervation of tendons and aponeuroses. , 1957, The American journal of anatomy.

[33]  Joint receptors — changing ideas , 1978, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  B. Andrew The sensory innervation of the medial ligament of the knee joint , 1954, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  B. O'connor,et al.  Mechanoreceptors of the medial collateral ligament of the cat knee joint. , 1979, Journal of anatomy.

[36]  D. McCloskey,et al.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  A. English,et al.  Compartmentalization of single muscle units in cat lateral gastrocnemius , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  H. van Mameren,et al.  A Functional Anatomical Basis of Injuries to the Ligamentum and other Soft Tissues around the Elbow Joint: Transmission of Tensile and Compressive Loads , 1984 .

[39]  R. Schleip Fascial plasticity – a new neurobiological explanation: Part 1 , 2003 .

[40]  Z. Halata,et al.  Ultrastructure of sensory nerve endings in monkey (Macaca fascicularis) knee joint capsule , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[41]  B. Rossi,et al.  Characteristics of the receptors in the isolated capsule of the hip in the cat , 2004, International Orthopaedics.