Spanish norms for age of acquisition, concept familiarity, lexical frequency, manipulability, typicality, and other variables for 820 words from 14 living/nonliving concepts

This article presents a new corpus of 820 words pertaining to 14 semantic categories, 7 natural (animals, body parts, insects, flowers, fruits, trees, and vegetables) and 7 man-made (buildings, clothing, furniture, kitchen utensils, musical instruments, tools, and vehicles); each word in the database was collected empirically in a previous exemplar generation study. In the present study, 152 Spanish speakers provided data for four psycholinguistic variables known to affect lexical-semantic processing in both neurologically intact and brain-damaged participants: age of acquisition, familiarity, manipulability, and typicality. Furthermore, we collected lexical frequency data derived from Internet search hits, plus three additional Spanish lexical frequency indexes. Word length, number of syllables, and the proportion of respondents citing the exemplar as a category member—which can be useful as an additional measure of typicality—are also provided. Reliability and validity indexes showed that our items display characteristics similar to those of other corpora. Overall, this new corpus of words provides a useful tool for scientists engaged in cognitive- and neuroscience-based research focused on examining language, memory, and object processing. The full set of norms can be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.

[1]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks , 1979 .

[2]  H. Stadthagen-González,et al.  The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[3]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  E. Thorndike.  The Teacher's Word Book , 2007 .

[5]  R. Job,et al.  Objective age of acquisition for 223 Italian words: Norms and effects on picture naming speed , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[6]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  E. Rosch.  Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[9]  A. Clark.  Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[10]  C. Thompson,et al.  Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia , 2003, Brain and Language.

[11]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Imageability and body–object interaction ratings for 599 multisyllabic nouns , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[12]  Fernando Cuetos,et al.  Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[13]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[14]  T. Gale,et al.  The Hatfield Image Test (HIT): A new picture test and norms for experimental and clinical use , 2009, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[15]  Manuel Perea,et al.  EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[16]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Georgios A. Keliris,et al.  Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[18]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[19]  J. Schulz,et al.  The impact of dementia, age and sex on category fluency: Greater deficits in women with Alzheimer's disease , 2008, Cortex.

[20]  Angel Fernandez,et al.  A set of 254 Snodgrass-Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity , 1996 .

[21]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Simulating visibility during language comprehension , 2007, Cognition.

[22]  Ian S. Hargreaves,et al.  The neural correlates of the body-object interaction effect in semantic processing , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  P. Cozby,et al.  Methods in behavioral research , 1977 .

[24]  T. Shallice,et al.  Lissauer on Agnosia , 1988 .

[25]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Adjustment to Chronic Diseases and Terminal Illness Health Psychology : Psychological Adjustment to Chronic Disease , 2006 .

[26]  H. Lissauer,et al.  Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit nebst einem Beitrage zur Theorie derselben , 1890, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[27]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  E. Warrington,et al.  Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Randall J. Frank,et al.  Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  P. R. Montoro,et al.  Longitudinal patterns of fluency impairment in dementia: The role of domain and “nuisance variables” , 2010 .

[31]  Paul D. Siakaluk,et al.  Body—object interaction ratings for 1,618 monosyllabic nouns , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[32]  Elaine Funnell,et al.  Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .

[33]  N. Davey,et al.  Visual Similarity is Greater for Line Drawings of Nonliving Than Living Things: The Importance of Musical Instruments and Body Parts , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Determinants of naming latencies, object comprehension times, and new norms for the Russian standardized set of the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 2013, Behavior research methods.

[35]  E K Warrington,et al.  Disorders of semantic memory. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[36]  D. Westwood,et al.  Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  Fernando Cuetos,et al.  Age acquisition norms from elderly Spanish people: characteristics and the prediction of word recognition performance in Alzheimer's disease , 2012 .

[38]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[39]  Richard J. Epstein,et al.  Current perspectives in dysphasia , 1985 .

[40]  Lorella Lotto,et al.  Naming times and standardized norms for the italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[41]  Pedro R. Montoro,et al.  An Ecological Alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 High Quality Colour Images with Norms for Seven Psycholinguistic Variables , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Multiple meaning systems in the brain: A case for visual semantics , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: The body–object interaction effect , 2008, Cognition.

[45]  Irene V Blair,et al.  Using Internet search engines to estimate word frequency , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[46]  M Besson,et al.  The Snodgrass and Vanderwart Set Revisited: Norms for Object Manipulability and for Pictorial Ambiguity of Objects, Chimeric Objects, and Nonobjects , 2003, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[47]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Some Insults are Easier to Detect: The Embodied Insult Detection Effect , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[49]  Herminia Peraita Adrados,et al.  Un nuevo conjunto de ítems para la evaluación de la disociación ser vivo / ser no vivo con normas obtenidas de ancianos sanos españoles , 2007 .

[50]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles , 2011 .

[51]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[52]  Miguel A. Perez,et al.  Objective-AoA norms for 175 names in Spanish: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables, estimated AoA, and data from other languages , 2005 .

[53]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  German norms for semantic typicality, age of acquisition, and concept familiarity , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[54]  A. Grigoriev,et al.  Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 286 words in Russian: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[55]  Sandra A. McIntire,et al.  Foundations of Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[56]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Category norms for 500 Spanish words in five semantic categories , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[57]  J. Haxby,et al.  Parallel Visual Motion Processing Streams for Manipulable Objects and Human Movements , 2002, Neuron.

[58]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Real and Imagined Body Movement Primes Metaphor Comprehension , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[59]  William F. Mackey.  Le vocabulaire disponible du francais, Tome II. Vocabulaire disponible des enfants acadiens (The Working French Vocabulary, Volume 2. Working Vocabulary of Acadian Children). , 1971 .

[60]  J. Frederico Marques,et al.  Estimated age of acquisition norms for 834 Portuguese nouns and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[61]  J. Haxby,et al.  fMRI Responses to Video and Point-Light Displays of Moving Humans and Manipulable Objects , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[63]  Erminio Capitani,et al.  Living musical instruments and inanimate body parts? , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  K. Laws,et al.  A set of high quality colour images with Spanish norms for seven relevant psycholinguistic variables: The Nombela naming test , 2011, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.