COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on the cardiac implantable electronic devices’ implantation rates in Croatia

Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has influenced health-care organization worldwide, including management of non-communicable diseases. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac implantable electronic devices’ (CIEDs) implantation rates in Croatia. Methods A retrospective, observational, national study was conducted. The data on CIEDs’ implantation rates from 20 Croatian implantation centres, between January 2018 and June 2021, were extracted from the national Health Insurance Fund registry. Implantation rates before and after COVID-19 pandemic started, were compared. Results The overall numbers of CIED implantations in Croatia during COVID-19 pandemic were not different in comparison to 2 years pre-COVID-19 time (2618 vs. 2807, p = .081). The pacemaker implantation rates decreased significantly (by 45%) during April (122 vs. 223, p < .001) and May 2020 (135 vs. 244, p = .001), as well as during November 2020 (177 vs. 264, p = .003), but significantly increased during summer months 2020 comparing to 2018 and 2019 (737 vs. 497, p<0.001). The ICD implantation rates decreased significantly by 59% in April 2020 (26 vs. 64, p = .048). Conclusion To the authors best knowledge this is a first study including complete national data on CIED implantation rates and COVID-19 pandemic impact. A significant reduction in number of both pacemaker and ICD implants during specific months of the COVID-19 pandemic was determined. However, afterwards compensation in implants resulted in similar total number when the complete year was evaluated.

[1]  Lino Gonçalves,et al.  Impact of the COVID‐19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross‐sectional study , 2021, Journal of arrhythmia.

[2]  A. Auricchio,et al.  Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and mortality in Swiss Cantons with high and low COVID-19 incidence: A nationwide analysis , 2021, Resuscitation plus.

[3]  R. Borrás,et al.  Reduction in new cardiac electronic device implantations in Catalonia during COVID-19 , 2021, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[4]  G. Boriani,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical activities related to arrhythmias and electrophysiology in Italy: results of a survey promoted by AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing) , 2020, Internal and Emergency Medicine.

[5]  Javier Torres-Valencia,et al.  Impact of COVID‐19 on pacemaker implant , 2020, Journal of arrhythmia.

[6]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Admission of patients with STEMI since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey by the European Society of Cardiology , 2020, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[7]  S. Themistoclakis,et al.  Urgent Pacemaker Implantation Rates in the Veneto Region of Italy After the COVID-19 Outbreak , 2020, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[8]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Reduction of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction in Italy in the COVID-19 era , 2020, European heart journal.

[9]  M. Cipriani,et al.  The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic and Italian Lockdown Measures on Clinical Presentation and Management of Acute Heart Failure , 2020, Journal of Cardiac Failure.

[10]  O. Rodriguez-Leor,et al.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on interventional cardiology activity in Spain , 2020, REC: interventional cardiology (English Edition).

[11]  C. Schmidt,et al.  Reduction in ST-Segment Elevation Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activations in the United States During COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Salah,et al.  Methodology , 2003 .