Digital Service Platform Evolution: How Spotify Leveraged Boundary Resources to Become a Global Leader in Music Streaming

Research on digital platform evolution is largely focused on how platform-owners leverage boundary resources to facilitate and control contributions from external developers to extend the functiona ...

[1]  A. Gawer.  Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[4]  SørensenCarsten,et al.  Distributed tuning of boundary resources , 2015 .

[5]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  The digital platform: a research agenda , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software 'Apps' Developers and Patterns of Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[8]  Colin Perkins,et al.  An experimental study of client-side spotify peering behaviour , 2011, 2011 IEEE 36th Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[9]  Nancy Viola Wünderlich,et al.  The Value of Self-Service: Long-Term Effects of Technology-Based Self-Service Usage on Customer Retention , 2015, MIS Q..

[10]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[11]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service , 2010 .

[13]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions , 2015, MIS Q..

[15]  Gunnar Kreitz,et al.  Spotify -- Large Scale, Low Latency, P2P Music-on-Demand Streaming , 2010, 2010 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P).

[16]  BerenteNicholas,et al.  Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor , 2012 .

[17]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  On the Evolution of Mobile Platform Ecosystem Structure and Strategy , 2011, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[18]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[19]  Amy L. Ostrom,et al.  Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context , 2015 .

[20]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research , 2000 .

[21]  Mikael Goldmann,et al.  Measurements on the spotify peer-assisted music-on-demand streaming system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing.

[22]  Rahul C. Basole.  Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem , 2008, 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business.

[23]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[24]  David Gann,et al.  Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context , 2014 .

[25]  Sue Newell,et al.  Growing on Steroids: Rapidly Scaling the User Base of Digital Ventures Through Digital Innovation , 2017, MIS Q..

[26]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor: Digital Controls in the Automotive Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[27]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .