Direct measurement of large-scale quantum states via expectation values of non-Hermitian matrices

In quantum mechanics, predictions are made by way of calculating expectation values of observables, which take the form of Hermitian operators. Non-Hermitian operators, however, are not necessarily devoid of physical significance, and they can play a crucial role in the characterization of quantum states. Here we show that the expectation values of a particular set of non-Hermitian matrices, which we call column operators, directly yield the complex coefficients of a quantum state vector. We provide a definition of the state vector in terms of measurable quantities by decomposing these column operators into observables. The technique we propose renders very-large-scale quantum states significantly more accessible in the laboratory, as we demonstrate by experimentally characterizing a 100,000-dimensional entangled state. This represents an improvement of two orders of magnitude with respect to previous phase-and-amplitude characterizations of discrete entangled states.

[1]  R. Thew,et al.  On the purity and indistinguishability of down-converted photons , 2012, 1211.0120.

[2]  Measurement of the transverse spatial quantum state of light at the single-photon level. , 2005, Optics letters.

[3]  David A B Miller,et al.  Reconfigurable add-drop multiplexer for spatial modes. , 2013, Optics express.

[4]  Yu I Bogdanov,et al.  Statistical estimation of the efficiency of quantum state tomography protocols. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[5]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Tomography of the quantum state of photons entangled in high dimensions , 2011 .

[6]  E. Eliel,et al.  Full-field quantum correlations of spatially entangled photons. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[7]  Turid Rustad,et al.  Acknowledgements , 1996, Schizophrenia Research.

[8]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Generation and confirmation of a (100 × 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Adaptive quantum state tomography improves accuracy quadratically. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[10]  Stephen Becker,et al.  Quantum state tomography via compressed sensing. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[11]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Observing Dirac's classical phase space analog to the quantum state. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[12]  Matthias Christandl,et al.  Reliable quantum state tomography. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[13]  C. Caves,et al.  Minimal Informationally Complete Measurements for Pure States , 2004, quant-ph/0404137.

[14]  C. Schwemmer,et al.  Experimental comparison of efficient tomography schemes for a six-qubit state. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[15]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction , 2011, Nature.

[16]  Cheng-Zhi Peng,et al.  Observation of eight-photon entanglement , 2011, Nature Photonics.

[17]  Brian J Smith,et al.  Conditional preparation of single photons using parametric downconversion: a recipe for purity , 2008, 0807.1409.

[18]  Christopher Ferrie,et al.  Self-guided quantum tomography. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[19]  Stevenson,et al.  The sense in which a "weak measurement" of a spin-(1/2 particle's spin component yields a value 100. , 1989, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[20]  G. D’Ariano,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of the density matrix , 1999, quant-ph/9909052.

[21]  Yong Siah Teo,et al.  Informationally incomplete quantum tomography , 2013, 1309.2906.

[22]  Shota Yokoyama,et al.  Ultra-large-scale continuous-variable cluster states multiplexed in the time domain , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[23]  Stephen M. Barnett,et al.  Full characterization of the quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled biphotons , 2010, 1011.5970.

[24]  C. Schwemmer,et al.  Permutationally invariant quantum tomography. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[25]  Jonathan Leach,et al.  Direct measurement of a 27-dimensional orbital-angular-momentum state vector , 2013, Nature Communications.

[26]  A. Valencia,et al.  Spatiotemporal correlations in entangled photons generated by spontaneous parametric down conversion , 2008, 0804.2425.

[27]  Anmer Daskin Quantum Principal Component Analysis , 2015 .

[28]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[29]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Secure information capacity of photons entangled in many dimensions , 2012 .

[30]  T. Monz,et al.  14-Qubit entanglement: creation and coherence. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[31]  Pu Jian,et al.  Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[32]  Ebrahim Karimi,et al.  Exact solution to simultaneous intensity and phase encryption with a single phase-only hologram. , 2013, Optics letters.

[33]  D. Gross,et al.  Efficient quantum state tomography. , 2010, Nature communications.

[34]  Adetunmise C. Dada,et al.  Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities , 2011, 1104.5087.

[35]  Shengjun Wu,et al.  State tomography via weak measurements , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[36]  D. Gross,et al.  Focus on quantum tomography , 2013 .

[37]  Jonathan Leach,et al.  Reconstructing high-dimensional two-photon entangled states via compressive sensing , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[38]  W. Löffler,et al.  Walsh modes and radial quantum correlations of spatially entangled photons. , 2013, Optics letters.

[39]  M. Lavery,et al.  Efficient sorting of orbital angular momentum states of light. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[40]  R. Kosut,et al.  Efficient measurement of quantum dynamics via compressive sensing. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[41]  Ting Zhang,et al.  Experimental quantum state tomography via compressed sampling. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[42]  P. Knight,et al.  Entangled quantum systems and the Schmidt decomposition , 1995 .

[43]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Intuitive explanation of the phase anomaly of focused light beams , 1980 .

[44]  at]. , 2018, A Preface to Hardy.

[45]  G. Buller,et al.  Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera , 2012, Nature Communications.