A MULTIPLE CHOICE DECISION ANALYSIS: AN INTEGRATED QFD-AHP MODEL FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF CUSTOMER NEEDS

The aim of this work is to propose a new methodological approach to define customer specifications through the employment of an integrated Quality Function Deployment (QFD) – Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model. The model, which is loosely based on QFD, incorporates the AHP approach to delineate and rank the relative importance weight of expressed judgments for customer needs and functional characteristics. The Analytic Hierarchy Process is very useful for this aim because it is a mathematically rigorous, proven process for prioritization and decision-making. By reducing complex decisions to a series of pair-wise comparisons, then synthesizing the results, decision-makers arrive at the best decision with a clear rationale for that decision. The methodology adopted in this work is directed to evaluate as well as rank the definition of the customer’s needs and functional characteristics among several alternatives. The approach has been validated in a real case study concerning the filter in ceramic material production. Keywords : Quality Function Deployment, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Multi Criteria Decision Analysis International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology , Vol. 2, No. 9, 2010, pp. 25-38

[1]  N. P. Mukherjee,et al.  Rapid hard tooling process selection using QFD‐AHP methodology , 2006 .

[2]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example , 2005 .

[3]  Jie Xu,et al.  An integrated method of rough set, Kano's model and AHP for rating customer requirements' final importance , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Glenn H. Mazur,et al.  The leading edge in QFD: past, present and future , 2003 .

[5]  Joseph Moses Juran,et al.  Quality Planning and Analysis: From Product Development Through Usage , 1982 .

[6]  Chee-Cheng Chen,et al.  Integration of quality function deployment and process management in the semiconductor industry , 2009 .

[7]  Fabio De Felice,et al.  Proposal of a new model for the optimization of the organizational process in industrial company through the application of the Analytic Network Process , 2009 .

[8]  M. Bohanec,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2004 .

[9]  Xiande Zhao,et al.  An application of quality function deployment to improve the quality of teaching , 1998 .

[10]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[11]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[12]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  P.-T. Chuang,et al.  Combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Quality Function Deployment for a Location Decision from a Requirement Perspective , 2001 .

[14]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[15]  Cor P.M. Govers,et al.  QFD not just a tool but a way of quality management , 2001 .

[16]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis , 2009 .

[17]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  An evidential reasoning based approach for quality function deployment under uncertainty , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment , 2002, J. Intell. Manuf..

[19]  Shih-Wen Hsiao,et al.  Concurrent design method for developing a new product , 2002 .

[20]  S. K. Mukherjee,et al.  Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective , 2005 .

[21]  Fariborz Y. Partovi,et al.  A QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT APPROACH TO STRATEGIC CAPITAL BUDGETING , 1999 .

[22]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[23]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Dependence and Feedback , 2001 .

[24]  Manbir S. Sodhi,et al.  A conceptual QFD planning model , 2001 .

[25]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Kampan Mukherjee,et al.  Development of an AHP-QFD framework for designing a tourism product , 2008 .

[27]  Gülser Köksal,et al.  Planning and design of industrial engineering education quality , 1998 .