Biomechanical Analysis of a Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction*

The objective of this study was to experimentally evaluate a single-bundle versus a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing the resulting knee biomechanics with those of the intact knee. Ten human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The knees were subjected to a 134-N posterior tibial load at five flexion angles. Three knee conditions were tested: 1) intact knee, 2) single-bundle reconstruction, and 3) double-bundle reconstruction. Posterior tibial translation of the intact knee ranged from 4.9 2.7 mm at 90° to 7.2 1.5 mm at full extension. After the single-bundle reconstruction, posterior tibial translation increased to 7.3 3.9 mm and 9.2 2.8 mm at 90° and full extension, respectively, while the corresponding in situ forces in the graft were up to 44 19 N lower than those in the intact ligament. Conversely, with double-bundle reconstruction, the posterior tibial translation did not differ significantly from the intact knee at any flexion angle tested. This reconstruction also restored in situ forces more closely than did the single-bundle reconstruction. These data suggest that a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can more closely restore the biomechanics of the intact knee than can the single-bundle reconstruction throughout the range of knee flexion.

[1]  P. Fowler,et al.  Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  M. Friedman,et al.  Acute posterior cruciate ligament injuries , 1981, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  A. Amis,et al.  PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 'isometric' versus single and double-bundled 'anatomic' grafts. , 1998 .

[4]  R. Trawick,et al.  Double-Tunnel Technique for the Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament , 2001 .

[5]  K. Shelbourne,et al.  The Natural History of Acute, Isolated, Nonoperatively Treated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  S. Woo,et al.  The Human Posterior Cruciate Ligament Complex: An Interdisciplinary Study , 1995, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  A. Amis,et al.  The mechanical properties of the two bundles of the human posterior cruciate ligament. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  G A Livesay,et al.  A combined robotic/universal force sensor approach to determine in situ forces of knee ligaments. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  L. Bisson,et al.  Double tunnel technique forreconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament , 1999 .

[10]  A. Amis,et al.  PCL reconstruction. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 'isometric' versus single and double-bundled 'anatomic' grafts. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  S. Woo,et al.  Determination of the In Situ Forces in the Human Posterior Cruciate Ligament Using Robotic Technology , 1998, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  K. Markolf,et al.  A Biomechanical Study of Replacement of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament with a Graft. Part I: Isometry, Pre-Tension of the Graft, and Anterior-Posterior Laxity* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  M. Cross,et al.  Long-term followup of posterior cruciate ligament rupture: A study of 116 cases , 1984, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  F. Girgis,et al.  The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. Anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. , 1975, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  F. Noyes,et al.  Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 1996, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  J. S. Keene,et al.  Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  P. Fowler,et al.  Isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes , 1987, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  K.,et al.  Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  A. Anderson,et al.  Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 1993 .

[20]  J. BotellaLlusiá,et al.  [Long-term results]. , 1983, Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina.

[21]  F. Savoie,et al.  Operative management of acute PCL injuries with associated pathology: long-term results. , 1991, Orthopedics.

[22]  D. Dandy,et al.  The long-term results of unrepaired tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  S. Woo,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[24]  B. Reider,et al.  The Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position and Graft Tensioning Technique on Posterior Laxity of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee , 1995, The American journal of sports medicine.

[25]  Kanamori A Janaushek M. A.,et al.  OF KNEE FLEXION ANGLE AND TIBIAL POSITION DURING GRAFT FIXATION ON THE BIOMECHANICS OF A PCL RECONSTRUCTED KNEE , 1999 .