Body pointing, acquisition and tracking for small satellite laser communication

Free-space optical communications in space offer many benefits over established radio frequency based communication links; in particular, high beam directivity results in efficient power usage. Such a reduced power requirement is particularly appealing to small satellites with strict size, weight and power (SWaP) requirements. In the case of free-space optical communication, precise pointing, acquisition and tracking (PAT) of the incoming beam is necessary to close the communication link. Due to the narrow beam of the laser, the critical task of accomplishing PAT becomes increasingly arduous and often requires complex systems of optical and processing hardware to account for relative movement of the terminals. Recent developments in body pointing mecha- nisms have allowed small satellites to point with greater precision. In this work, we consider an approach to a low-complexity PAT system that utilizes a single quad-cell photodetector as an optical spatial sensor, and exploits the body pointing capabilities of the spacecraft to perform the tracking maneuvers, eschewing the need for additional dedicated optical hardware. We look at the PAT performance of this approach from a systems analysis viewpoint and present preliminary experimental results. In particular, we examine the implementation of the system on NASA's TeraByte InfraRed Delivery (TBIRD) demonstration.

[1]  Hamid Hemmati,et al.  Near-Earth Laser Communications , 2009, Near-Earth Laser Communications.

[2]  Bryan S. Robinson,et al.  Overview and results of the Lunar Laser Communication Demonstration , 2014, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[3]  Joel Shields,et al.  Characterization of CubeSat Reaction Wheel Assemblies , 2017 .

[4]  Roberto Rojas-Cessa,et al.  A Survey on Acquisition, Tracking, and Pointing Mechanisms for Mobile Free-Space Optical Communications , 2018, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[5]  M. Orenstein,et al.  Acquisition and pointing control for inter-satellite laser communications , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[6]  Michael J. Long Pointing acquisition and tracking design and analysis for CubeSat Laser communication , 2018 .

[7]  Jamie W. Burnside,et al.  Design of an inertially stabilized telescope for the LLCD , 2011, LASE.

[8]  J. J. Carney,et al.  Design of a 40-Watt 1.55μm uplink transmitter for Lunar Laser Communications , 2012, Other Conferences.

[9]  Todd S. Rose,et al.  Optical communications downlink from a 1.5U Cubesat: OCSD program , 2019, International Conference on Space Optics.

[10]  Hyosang Yoon Pointing system performance analysis for optical inter-satellite communication on CubeSats , 2017 .

[11]  Christopher Pong On-Orbit Performance & Operation of the Attitude & Pointing Control Subsystems on ASTERIA , 2018 .

[12]  Ondrej Čierny Precision Closed-Loop Laser Pointing System for the Nanosatellite Optical Downlink Experiment , 2017 .

[13]  V. Milanovic Linearized Gimbal-less Two-Axis MEMS Mirrors , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[14]  Oleg V. Sindiy,et al.  Achieving operational two-way laser acquisition for OPALS payload on the International Space Station , 2015, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[15]  Curt M. Schieler,et al.  TeraByte InfraRed Delivery (TBIRD): a demonstration of large-volume direct-to-Earth data transfer from low-Earth orbit , 2018, LASE.

[16]  Curt M. Schieler,et al.  Data delivery performance of space-to-ground optical communication systems employing rate-constrained feedback protocols , 2017, LASE.

[17]  Curt M. Schieler,et al.  Data volume analysis of a 100+ Gb/s LEO-to-ground optical link with ARQ , 2018, LASE.

[18]  Abhishek Kasturi,et al.  Closed-loop control of gimbal-less MEMS mirrors for increased bandwidth in LiDAR applications , 2017, Defense + Security.