Repeatability of grasp recognition for robotic hand prosthesis control based on sEMG data

Control methods based on sEMG obtained promising results for hand prosthetics. Control system robustness is still often inadequate and does not allow the amputees to perform a large number of movements useful for everyday life. Only few studies analyzed the repeatability of sEMG classification of hand grasps. The main goals of this paper are to explore repeatability in sEMG data and to release a repeatability database with the recorded experiments. The data are recorded from 10 intact subjects repeating 7 grasps 12 times, twice a day for 5 days. The data are publicly available on the Ninapro web page. The analysis for the repeatability is based on the comparison of movement classification accuracy in several data acquisitions and for different subjects. The analysis is performed using mean absolute value and waveform length features and a Random Forest classifier. The accuracy obtained by training and testing on acquisitions at different times is on average 27.03% lower than training and testing on the same acquisition. The results obtained by training and testing on different acquisitions suggest that previous acquisitions can be used to train the classification algorithms. The inter-subject variability is remarkable, suggesting that specific characteristics of the subjects can affect repeatibility and sEMG classification accuracy. In conclusion, the results of this paper can contribute to develop more robust control systems for hand prostheses, while the presented data allows researchers to test repeatability in further analyses.

[1]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Xinjun Sheng,et al.  User adaptation in long-term, open-loop myoelectric training: implications for EMG pattern recognition in prosthesis control , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  Li Qiang,et al.  Test-Retest Repeatability of Surface Electromyography Measurement for Hand Gesture , 2008, 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  Massimo Sartori,et al.  CEINMS: A toolbox to investigate the influence of different neural control solutions on the prediction of muscle excitation and joint moments during dynamic motor tasks. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  A characterization of the effect of limb position on EMG features to guide the development of effective prosthetic control schemes , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Ilja Kuzborskij,et al.  On the challenge of classifying 52 hand movements from surface electromyography , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Wavelet Distance Measure for Person Identification Using Electrocardiograms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Control Capabilities of Myoelectric Robotic Prostheses by Hand Amputees: A Scientific Research and Market Overview , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[9]  Barbara Caputo,et al.  Classification of hand movements in amputated subjects by sEMG and accelerometers , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Arto Visala,et al.  urrent state of digital signal processing in myoelectric interfaces and elated applications , 2015 .

[11]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally-controlled robotic hand prostheses , 2014, Scientific Data.

[12]  Roberto Merletti,et al.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  Jie Liu,et al.  Adaptive myoelectric pattern recognition toward improved multifunctional prosthesis control. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Reza Langari,et al.  A performance comparison of hand motion EMG classification , 2014, 2nd Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Dario Farina,et al.  Long term stability of surface EMG pattern classification for prosthetic control , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Fine detection of grasp force and posture by amputees via surface electromyography , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[17]  Patrick E. McKight,et al.  Kruskal-Wallis Test , 2010 .

[18]  M Controzzi,et al.  Online Myoelectric Control of a Dexterous Hand Prosthesis by Transradial Amputees , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Real-Time Classification of Electromyographic Signals for Robotic Control , 2005, AAAI.

[22]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Refined myoelectric control in below-elbow amputees using artificial neural networks and a data glove. , 2005, The Journal of hand surgery.

[23]  Barry N. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of Nist Measurement Results , 2017 .

[24]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Surface EMG in advanced hand prosthetics , 2008, Biological Cybernetics.