Effect of the fit between situational regulatory focus and feedback focus on customers' co-design behavior

PurposeCustomers' co-design behavior is an important source of knowledge for product innovation. Firms can regulate the focus of information interaction with customers to set goals and motivate their co-design behavior. Drawing on regulatory fit theory and construal level theory, the authors build a research model to study whether the fit between the regulatory focus of firms' task invitations (promotion focus vs prevention focus) and their feedback focus (self-focused vs other-focused) can enhance co-design behavior by improving customers' experiences (perceived meaning, active discovery and perceived empowerment).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted two online between-subjects experiments to validate the proposed research model.FindingsThe two online experiments reveal that customers' experiences are enhanced when the feedback focus is congruent with the regulatory focus of the firm's task invitations. Specifically, self-focused feedback has a stronger positive effect on customers' experiences in the prevention focus context. Other-focused feedback has a stronger positive effect on customers' experiences in the promotion focus context. Moreover, customers' experience significantly and positively affects co-design behavior (i.e. co-design effort and knowledge contribution).Originality/valueThis work provides theoretical and practical implications for firms to improve the effectiveness of information interaction with their customers and eventually ensure the sustainability of co-design.

[1]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Idea crowdsourcing platforms for new product development: A study of idea quality and the number of submitted ideas , 2023, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  D. Leidner,et al.  Feedback types and users' behavior in online innovation contests: Evidence of two underlying mechanisms , 2023, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Jeffrey C. F. Tai,et al.  Role of brand engagement and co-creation experience in online brand community continuance: A service-dominant logic perspective , 2023, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Nancy Spears,et al.  Using representational and abstract imagery to create regulatory fit effects , 2022, Psychology & Marketing.

[5]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Boosted by closure! Regulatory focus predicts motivation and task persistence in the aftermath of task‐unrelated goal closure , 2022, European Journal of Social Psychology.

[6]  Sengun Yeniyurt,et al.  An empirical examination of consumer co-creation process , 2022, Marketing Letters.

[7]  Christy M. K. Cheung,et al.  Meaningful engagement with a gamified knowledge management system: theoretical conceptualization and empirical validation , 2022, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[8]  R. Perdue,et al.  Developing creative service ideas through hotel customer engagement for open innovation: Focused on empowerment and motivation processes , 2022, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[9]  Mingli Zhang,et al.  What contributes to online communities' prosperity? Understanding value co-creation in product-experience-shared communities (PESCs) from the view of resource integration , 2021, Inf. Technol. People.

[10]  Timmy H. Tseng,et al.  Psychological empowerment and user satisfaction: Investigating the influences of online brand community participation , 2021, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Sotaro Katsumata,et al.  The effects of ad heuristic and systematic cues on consumer brand awareness and purchase intention: Investigating the bias effect of heuristic information processing , 2021 .

[12]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Is my design better? A co-creation perspective for online fashion design , 2021, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

[13]  Ben Niu,et al.  Platform-based customer agility: An integrated framework of information management structure, capability, and culture , 2021, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[14]  Yuanyuan Jiao,et al.  The role of crowdsourcing in product design: The moderating effect of user expertise and network connectivity , 2021 .

[15]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Effects of message framing and evidence type on health information behavior: the case of promoting HPV vaccination , 2020, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[16]  Li Wang,et al.  The effect of regulatory focus on customer citizenship behavior in a virtual brand community: The role of online s elf‐presentation and community identification , 2020 .

[17]  Y. Qi,et al.  Manufacturing practices and servitization: The role of mass customization and product innovation capabilities , 2020 .

[18]  Jaideep Sengupta,et al.  The Influence of Disease Cues on Preference for Typical versus Atypical Products , 2020 .

[19]  Xiaotong Li,et al.  Understanding promotion framing effect on purchase intention of elderly mobile app consumers , 2020, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[20]  F. Turner,et al.  Enhancing consumer value of the co-design experience in mass customization , 2020 .

[21]  Y. Liu-Thompkins,et al.  Investigating the influence of regulatory focus on the efficacy of online review volume versus valence , 2020 .

[22]  J. Schaubroeck,et al.  Polluted Psyche: Is the Effect of Air Pollution on Unethical Behavior More Physiological or Psychological? , 2020, Psychological science.

[23]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Creativity of Participants in Crowdsourcing Communities: The Effects of Promotion Focus and Extrinsic Motivation , 2020, J. Database Manag..

[24]  Han Zhang,et al.  More than Words in Medical Question-and-Answer Sites: A Content-Context Congruence Perspective , 2020, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Yili Hong,et al.  User idea implementation in open innovation communities: Evidence from a new product development crowdsourcing community , 2020, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Xiaoli Nan,et al.  Temporal Framing Effects Differ for Narrative Versus Non-Narrative Messages: The Case of Promoting HPV Vaccination , 2019, Commun. Res..

[27]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Tournaments to Crowdsource Innovation: The Role of Moderator Feedback and Participation Intensity , 2019, Journal of Marketing.

[28]  S. Lee.  The Role of Construal Level in Message Effects Research: A Review and Future Directions , 2018, Communication Theory.

[29]  Amit Basu,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Customer Co-design , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Jakob Trischler,et al.  The Value of Codesign , 2018 .

[31]  Bo Yang,et al.  Motivating User-Generated Content with Performance Feedback: Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Haixin Liu,et al.  To gain or not to lose? The effect of monetary reward on motivation and knowledge contribution , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[33]  Ayoung Suh,et al.  How gamification of an enterprise collaboration system increases knowledge contribution: an affordance approach , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  Ayoung Suh,et al.  Gamification in the Workplace: The Central Role of the Aesthetic Experience , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Ling Wang,et al.  The relationship between self-construal and creativity — Regulatory focus as moderator , 2016 .

[36]  T. Fernandes,et al.  How to engage customers in co-creation: customers’ motivations for collaborative innovation , 2016 .

[37]  Glenn Leshner,et al.  The Role of Narrative and Other-Referencing in Attenuating Psychological Reactance to Diabetes Self-Care Messages , 2016, Health communication.

[38]  Thomas Mack,et al.  Winners, losers, and deniers , 2015 .

[39]  Xuequn Wang,et al.  Encouraging knowledge contribution in IT support: social context and the differential effects of motivation type , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[40]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[41]  N. Kalampalikis,et al.  When the Model Fits the Frame , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[42]  Steve Hoeffler,et al.  Optimal Visualization Aids and Temporal Framing for New Products , 2014 .

[43]  Gerald Häubl,et al.  Product Customization via Starting Solutions , 2014 .

[44]  I. Phau,et al.  Examining Regulatory Focus in the Information Processing of Imagery and Analytical Advertisements , 2014 .

[45]  Anne L. Roggeveen,et al.  Regulatory fit:a meta analytic synthesis , 2014 .

[46]  Haemoon Oh,et al.  Effective Communication Strategies for Hotel Guests’ Green Behavior , 2014 .

[47]  Kiljae K. Lee,et al.  Regulatory Focus as a Predictor of Attitudes Toward Partitioned and Combined Pricing , 2014 .

[48]  Gerald Häubl,et al.  When Social Media Can Be Bad for You: Community Feedback Stifles Consumer Creativity and Reduces Satisfaction with Self-Designed Products , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  A. Kluger,et al.  Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective , 2011 .

[50]  J. Füller,et al.  Why Co‐Creation Experience Matters? Creative Experience and its Impact on the Quantity and Quality of Creative Contributions , 2011 .

[51]  K. White,et al.  It's the Mind-Set that Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors , 2011 .

[52]  Matthijs Baas,et al.  When prevention promotes creativity: the role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  D. Stapel,et al.  RETRACTED: Me tomorrow, the others later: How perspective fit increases sustainable behavior , 2011 .

[54]  Jason Q. Zhang,et al.  When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews☆ , 2010 .

[55]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[56]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Different Roles, Different Strokes: Organizing Virtual Customer Environments to Promote Two Types of Customer Contributions , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[57]  J. Füller.  Refining Virtual Co-Creation from a Consumer Perspective , 2010 .

[58]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  More than Words: On the Importance of Picture–Text Congruence in the Online Environment , 2010 .

[59]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness , 2010 .

[60]  Johann Füller,et al.  Consumer Empowerment Through Internet-Based Co-creation , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  N. Franke,et al.  “Pyramiding: Efficient search for rare subjects” , 2009 .

[62]  V. Kumar,et al.  Interaction Orientation and Firm Performance , 2008 .

[63]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Level Theory and Consumer Behavior , 2007 .

[64]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[65]  S. Nambisan,et al.  Interactions in virtual customer environments: Implications for product support and customer relationship management , 2007 .

[66]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[67]  Jing Wang,et al.  The Role of Regulatory Focus in Preference Construction , 2006 .

[68]  Jens Förster,et al.  How Global Versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus , 2005, Psychological science.

[69]  E. Higgins,et al.  Value From Regulatory Fit , 2005 .

[70]  Grace I. Kunz,et al.  Individual differences, motivations, and willingness to use a mass customization option for fashion products , 2004 .

[71]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[72]  J. Förster,et al.  The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[73]  Preet S. Aulakh,et al.  International Principal–Agent Relationships , 2000 .

[74]  E. Higgins.  Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[75]  Kirk Hallahan,et al.  Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations , 1999 .

[76]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[77]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events , 1991 .

[78]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[79]  Xinxue Zhou,et al.  How the type and valence of feedback information influence volunteers' knowledge contribution in citizen science projects , 2021, Inf. Process. Manag..

[80]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Role of Feedback: Evidence from Field Experiments with Innovation Tournaments , 2017 .

[81]  Misook Heo,et al.  Supporting sustained willingness to share knowledge with visual feedback , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[82]  Christoph Fuchs,et al.  Customer Empowerment in New Product Development , 2011 .

[83]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  The "I Designed It Myself" Effect in Mass Customization , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[84]  Avraham N. Kluger,et al.  Feedback Sign Effect on Motivation: Is it Moderated by Regulatory Focus? , 2004 .

[85]  Frank Thomas Piller,et al.  Key research issues in user interaction with user toolkits in a mass customisation system , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[86]  E. Higgins,et al.  Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.