Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal

This paper analyzes the co-benefits of introducing a time variant carbon (C) tax scheme in Nepal, a hydropower resourceful country, by using a bottom up integrated energy system model based on the MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) framework with time horizon of 2005–2050. It discusses the effects of C tax on energy mix, environmental emissions, energy supply security, energy efficiency, energy system cost, and employment benefit. The study shows that the C tax (that gradually increases from US$ 13/tCO2e in 2015 to US$ 200/tCO2e by 2050) results in a reduction of the cumulative emission of greenhouse gases by 83.9 million tons CO2e (12%) as compared to that in the base case. With the introduction of the C tax, there would be a need for additional hydropower capacity of 945 MW by 2050 as compared to the capacity in the base case. The emission of local pollutants consisting of sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) in 2050 would be reduced by 12%, 7% and 1% respectively under the C tax scenario. Total amount of imported energy would decrease by 13%, which corresponds to a reduction in discounted net fuel import cost by 5% during the study period. Furthermore, the C tax would result in new employment generation of 151 thousand man-years associated with the additional hydropower capacity requirement.

[1]  Charles O.P. Marpaung,et al.  Supply- and demand-side effects of carbon tax in the Indonesian power sector : an integrated resource planning analysis , 1999 .

[2]  S. Dhakal Urban Transportation and the Environment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: Integrating Global Carbon Concerns into Local Air Pollution Management , 2006 .

[3]  R. Bose,et al.  Elasticities of electricity demand in India , 1999 .

[4]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[5]  Migara H. Liyanage,et al.  Effects of carbon tax on greenhouse gas mitigation in Thailand , 2008 .

[6]  Ahmad Rizal Mohd Yusof,et al.  A review of MARKAL energy modeling , 2009 .

[7]  N. Yorino,et al.  A Modified DEA Model for Benchmarking of Hydropower Plants , 2007, 2007 IEEE Lausanne Power Tech.

[8]  H. Salehfar,et al.  Substitution and Price Effects of Carbon Tax on CO2 Emissions Reduction from Distributed Energy Sources , 2006, 2006 Power Systems Conference: Advanced Metering, Protection, Control, Communication, and Distributed Resources.

[9]  B. Limmeechokchai,et al.  Integrated Resource Planning with Carbon Tax: Effects on Power Generation Expansion Planning in Vietnam , 2003 .

[10]  Kevin Morrow,et al.  Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Review , 2008 .

[11]  C. Venkataraman,et al.  Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide emissions from India. Part II—biomass combustion , 2002 .

[12]  Dong Sik Jang,et al.  Impact assessment of CO2 mitigation options in Korea using energy system analysis model , 2009 .

[13]  Ram M. Shrestha,et al.  Energy and environmental implications of carbon emission reduction targets: Case of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal , 2010 .

[14]  E. Endo Market penetration analysis of fuel cell vehicles in japan by using the energy system model MARKAL , 2007 .

[15]  Jyotirmay Mathur,et al.  Investigation of greenhouse gas reduction potential and change in technological selection in Indian power sector , 2003 .

[16]  Ram M. Shrestha,et al.  Environmental and electricity planning implications of carbon tax and technological constraints in a developing country , 1998 .

[17]  D. Martinsen,et al.  CCS: A future CO2 mitigation option for Germany?—A bottom-up approach , 2007 .

[18]  Richard Loulou,et al.  Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme , 2005 .

[19]  Priyadarshi R. Shukla,et al.  Low-carbon society scenarios for India , 2008 .

[20]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Analysis of the impacts of carbon taxes on energy systems in Japan , 2001 .

[21]  James Eaves,et al.  A cost comparison of fuel-cell and battery electric vehicles , 2004 .

[22]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[23]  Todd Levin,et al.  State-scale evaluation of renewable electricity policy: The role of renewable electricity credits and carbon taxes , 2011 .

[24]  Supachart Chungpaibulpatana,et al.  Impacts of biomass power generation and CO2 taxation on electricity generation expansion planning and environmental emissions , 2001 .

[25]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Indicators for energy security , 2009 .

[26]  Sylvain Leduc,et al.  Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria. , 2011 .

[27]  Quoc Khanh Nguyen Long term optimization of energy supply and demand in Vietnam with special reference to the potential of renewable energy , 2005 .

[28]  C. Venkataraman,et al.  Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide emissions from India: I—Fossil fuel combustion , 2002 .