Does Computer Navigation or Robotic Assistance Affect the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.

[1]  N. Bedard,et al.  Operative Time and Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2022, The Iowa orthopaedic journal.

[2]  N. Heckmann,et al.  Computer-Navigated and Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Increasing in Popularity without Increasing Complications. , 2022, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  J. Ko,et al.  Avoidance of intramedullary violation in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty lowers the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: A propensity score matching analysis of 5342 cases. , 2022, The Knee.

[4]  R. Schwarzkopf,et al.  Comparison of Utilization and Short-term Complications Between Technology-assisted and Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2022, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[5]  S. Jerabek,et al.  Robotic-Assistance for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty is Associated with Lower Risk of Revision for Dislocation when Compared to Manual Techniques. , 2022, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  G. Tompkins,et al.  Robotic Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty in High Volume Surgeons: A Comparison of Cost and Quality Metrics. , 2021, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Incidence and predictors of prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee arthroplasty: A 15-year population-based cohort study. , 2021, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  J. Vigdorchik,et al.  Trends of Utilization and 90-Day Complication Rates for Computer-Assisted Navigation and Robotic Assistance for Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2010 to 2018 , 2021, Arthroplasty today.

[9]  Ng Jonathan Patrick,et al.  No difference in long-term functional outcomes or survivorship after total knee arthroplasty with or without computer navigation: a 17-year survivorship analysis , 2021, Knee Surgery & Related Research.

[10]  Ahmed K. Emara,et al.  Robotic-arm–assisted Knee Arthroplasty Associated With Favorable In-hospital Metrics and Exponentially Rising Adoption Compared With Manual Knee Arthroplasty , 2021, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[11]  Gwo-Chin Lee,et al.  Reduced postoperative morbidity in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective comparison of 225,123 cases. , 2021, The Knee.

[12]  Akshar H. Patel,et al.  Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study , 2020, Arthroplasty today.

[13]  R. D. de Steiger,et al.  Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review , 2020, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[14]  A. Khoshbin,et al.  Trends and patient factors associated with technology-assisted total hip arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2014 , 2020, Arthroplasty today.

[15]  C. Dlaska,et al.  Computer-Assisted Technologies in Arthroplasty: Navigating Your Way Today. , 2020, JBJS reviews.

[16]  Langan S. Smith,et al.  Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrates decreased postoperative pain and opioid usage compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty , 2020, Bone & joint open.

[17]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial. , 2020, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  N. Heckmann,et al.  Population-based Survivorship of Computer-navigated Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2020, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[19]  J. Blanco,et al.  Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty , 2019, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[20]  S. Song,et al.  Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Long-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Longer Operative Time Results in a Higher Rate of Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Primary Joint Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  N. Sheth,et al.  Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030 , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  O. Furnes,et al.  Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement: A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  J. Mayerson,et al.  Perioperative Allogeneic Red Blood-Cell Transfusion Associated with Surgical Site Infection After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  The History of Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2018 .

[26]  J. Bosco,et al.  Technology-Assisted Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of Utilization Trends. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  S. Cahue,et al.  Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective , 2017, Arthroplasty today.

[28]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty: Rates of Adoption and Early Complications. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  R. Meneghini,et al.  Modern abbreviated computer navigation of the femur reduces blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[30]  S. Young,et al.  Does Computer Assisted Navigation Improve Functional Outcomes and Implant Survivability after Total Knee Arthroplasty? , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  Yen-Liang Liu,et al.  Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[32]  M. Inacio,et al.  Risk factors associated with deep surgical site infections after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 56,216 knees. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  G. J. Shepard,et al.  Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay. , 2012, The Knee.

[34]  W. Bargar,et al.  Robotic-assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA , 2012, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  K. Sloan,et al.  Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[36]  J. Parvizi,et al.  New Definition for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  F. Picard,et al.  Blood loss following total knee replacement in the morbidly obese: Effects of computer navigation. , 2011, The Knee.

[38]  Steven M. Kurtz,et al.  The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  T. Fehring,et al.  Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[40]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  R. Laskin,et al.  Prolonged Operative Time Correlates with Increased Infection Rate After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, HSS Journal.

[42]  D. Simpson,et al.  Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[43]  Steven Kurtz,et al.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[44]  A. Tria,et al.  The total condylar knee prosthesis: the first 5 years. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[45]  C. Ranawat,et al.  The total condylar knee prosthesis. A report of two hundred and twenty cases. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[46]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Total condylar knee replacment: preliminary report. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[47]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[48]  I. Cho,et al.  Allogeneic Blood Transfusion Is a Significant Risk Factor for Surgical-Site Infection Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[49]  Teemu Moilanen,et al.  Risk factors for infection after knee arthroplasty. A register-based analysis of 43,149 cases. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[50]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.