Image Formation and Data Processing

For the past several years, computer speeds have tended to double every year. This is an exponential growth curve, and the cumulative gain is impressive: programs running for a day 10 years ago now require a minute. This allows algorithm designers to follow new strategies. Ingenious mathematics and clever numerical analysis now must face competition from inefficient and ugly brute-force computations, and soon will no longer be necessary. An important advantage is that problems which cannot be solved analytically can now be tackled with computation-intensive numerical procedures.

[1]  Nuno Ferreira,et al.  Assessment of 3-D PET quantitation: influence of out of the field of view radioactive sources and of attenuating media , 1998 .

[2]  B F Hutton,et al.  Use of 3D reconstruction to correct for patient motion in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  R J Jaszczak,et al.  A filtered-backprojection algorithm for fan-beam SPECT which corrects for patient motion. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  D S Lalush,et al.  A generalized Gibbs prior for maximum a posteriori reconstruction in SPECT. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Gabor T. Herman,et al.  Image reconstruction from projections : the fundamentals of computerized tomography , 1980 .

[7]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[8]  C E Metz,et al.  An evaluation of maximum likelihood-expectation maximization reconstruction for SPECT by ROC analysis. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Albert Macovski,et al.  A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Emission Image Reconstruction from Projections , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  J. Ollinger Model-based scatter correction for fully 3D PET. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  R. Leahy,et al.  Comparing lesion detection performance for PET image reconstruction algorithms: A case study , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[13]  W. Niessen,et al.  Selection of task-dependent diffusion filters for the post-processing of SPECT images. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  P Schmidlin,et al.  Iterative Separation of Sections in Tomographic Scintigrams , 1972, Nuklearmedizin.

[15]  E. Veklerov,et al.  Stopping Rule for the MLE Algorithm Based on Statistical Hypothesis Testing , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  ROC evaluation of SPECT myocardial lesion detectability with and without single iteration non-uniform Chang attenuation compensation using an anthropomorphic female phantom , 1998 .

[17]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction and use of anatomical a priori information for emission tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[18]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  J Llacer,et al.  Feasible images and practical stopping rules for iterative algorithms in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[20]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Improved SPECT quantitation using fully three-dimensional iterative spatially variant scatter response compensation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[21]  Grant T. Gullberg,et al.  Implementation of a model-based nonuniform scatter correction scheme for SPECT , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  Misalignment between PET transmission and emission scans: its effect on myocardial imaging. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Robert M. Lewitt,et al.  Fourier correction for spatially variant collimator blurring in SPECT , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[24]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  The Use of Sieves to Stabilize Images Produced with the EM Algorithm for Emission Tomography , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[25]  R. Huesman A new fast algorithm for the evaluation of regions of interest and statistical uncertainty in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Eiichi Tanaka A Fast Reconstruction Algorthm for Stationary Positron Emission Tomography Based on a Modified EM Algorithm , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  M A King,et al.  Comparison of frequency-distance relationship and Gaussian-diffusion-based methods of compensation for distance-dependent spatial resolution in SPECT imaging. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  S H Manglos,et al.  Quantitative analysis of image truncation in focal-beam CT , 1993 .

[29]  S. Walrand,et al.  Quantitation in SPECT using an effective model of the scattering. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[31]  P. Msaki,et al.  Subtraction of Compton-scattered photons in single-photon emission computerized tomography. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Linda Kaufman,et al.  Implementing and Accelerating the EM Algorithm for Positron Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  Y.-C. Tai,et al.  A hybrid attenuation correction technique to compensate for lung density in 3-D total body PET , 1994 .

[34]  Keith L. Black,et al.  A modeling-based factor extraction method for determining spatial heterogeneity of Ga-68 EDTA kinetics in brain tumors , 1996 .

[35]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Effects of misalignment between transmission and emission scans on attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[37]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[38]  S C Strother,et al.  The convergence of object dependent resolution in maximum likelihood based tomographic image reconstruction. , 1993, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Results of a clinical receiver operating characteristic study comparing filtered backprojection and maximum likelihood estimator images in FDG PET studies. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  An analytical model for Compton scatter in a homogeneously attenuating medium , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[42]  D Ros,et al.  Evaluation of a cross-validation stopping rule in MLE SPECT reconstruction. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Modeling of carbon-11-acetate kinetics by simultaneously fitting data from multiple ROIs coupled by common parameters. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993 .

[45]  P Suetens,et al.  Three-dimensional correction for spillover and recovery of myocardial PET images. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  Michael A. King,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE FILTERING OF TEW SCATTER ESTIMATES USED TO COMPENSATE FOR SCATTER WITH ORDERED SUBSET RECONSTRUCTIONS , 1996 .

[47]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative reconstruction for helical CT: a simulation study. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  Michael A. King,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of scatter correction on lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging , 1995 .

[49]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[50]  R. Lewitt Alternatives to voxels for image representation in iterative reconstruction algorithms , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[51]  Samuel Matej,et al.  Data processing and image reconstruction methods for the HEAD PENN-PET scanner , 1998 .

[52]  T. Jones,et al.  Parametric image reconstruction using spectral analysis of PET projection data. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[53]  B F Hutton,et al.  Application of distance-dependent resolution compensation and post-reconstruction filtering for myocardial SPECT. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[54]  Matt A. King,et al.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 2. Attenuation compensation algorithms , 1996, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[55]  Michael A. King,et al.  Noniterative compensation for the distance-dependent detector response and photon attenuation in SPECT imaging , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[56]  H. Iida,et al.  Monte Carlo evaluation of accuracy and noise properties of two scatter correction methods for /sup 201/Tl cardiac SPECT , 1997 .

[57]  P Suetens,et al.  A study of the liver-heart artifact in emission tomography. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[58]  P W Doherty,et al.  Digital restoration of indium-111 and iodine-123 SPECT images with optimized Metz filters. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[59]  B F Hutton,et al.  Minimum cross-entropy reconstruction of PET images using prior anatomical information. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[60]  Johan Nuyts,et al.  PET with /sup 18/F-fluoride: effects of interative versus filtered backprojection reconstruction on kinetic modeling , 1997 .

[61]  Anna Celler,et al.  Experimental validation of an analytical method of calculating SPECT projection data , 1997 .

[62]  S R Cherry,et al.  Attenuation correction using count-limited transmission data in positron emission tomography. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[63]  S Eberl,et al.  Effects of scatter and attenuation correction on quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow with SPECT. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[64]  E U Mumcuoğlu,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of PET images: methodology and performance analysis. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[65]  Kevin J. Coakley,et al.  Use of cross-validation as a stopping rule in emission tomography image reconstruction , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[66]  A Todd-Pokropek,et al.  Introduction to holospectral imaging in nuclear medicine for scatter subtraction. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[67]  S. Bellini,et al.  Compensation of tissue absorption in emission tomography , 1979 .

[68]  W. K. Luk,et al.  Adaptive, segmented attenuation correction for whole-body PET imaging , 1996 .

[69]  Michael A. King,et al.  Reaction of truncation artifacts in fan beam transmission imaging using a spatially varying gamma prior , 1995 .

[70]  M E Phelps,et al.  Derivation of input function from FDG-PET studies in small hearts. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[71]  Arion F. Chatziioannou,et al.  Detailed investigation of transmission and emission data smoothing protocols and their effects on emission images , 1996 .