Magnetic Resonance Classification of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Study Design. A reliability study was conducted. Objectives. To develop a classification system for lumbar disc degeneration based on routine magnetic resonance imaging, to investigate the applicability of a simple algorithm, and to assess the reliability of this classification system. Summary of Background Data. A standardized nomenclature in the assessment of disc abnormalities is a prerequisite for a comparison of data from different investigations. The reliability of the assessment has a crucial influence on the validity of the data. Grading systems of disc degeneration based on state of the art magnetic resonance imaging and corresponding reproducibility studies currently are sparse. Methods. A grading system for lumbar disc degeneration was developed on the basis of the literature. An algorithm to assess the grading was developed and optimized by reviewing lumbar magnetic resonance examinations. The reliability of the algorithm in depicting intervertebral disc alterations was tested on the magnetic resonance images of 300 lumbar intervertebral discs in 60 patients (33 men and 27 women) with a mean age of 40 years (range, 10–83 years). All scans were analyzed independently by three observers. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were assessed by calculating kappa statistics. Results. There were 14 Grade I, 82 Grade II, 72 Grade III, 68 Grade IV, and 64 Grade V discs. The kappa coefficients for intra- and interobserver agreement were substantial to excellent: intraobserver (kappa range, 0.84–0.90) and interobserver (kappa range, 0.69–0.81). Complete agreement was obtained, on the average, in 83.8% of all the discs. A difference of one grade occurred in 15.9% and a difference of two or more grades in 1.3% of all the cases. Conclusion. Disc degeneration can be graded reliably on routine T2-weighted magnetic resonance images using the grading system and algorithm presented in this investigation.

[1]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Anatomical and clinical studies on lumbar disc degeneration. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[3]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[4]  R. Deyo,et al.  Observer variability in the interpretation of lumbar spine radiographs. , 1985, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[5]  M. Modic,et al.  Imaging of degenerative disk disease. , 1988, Radiology.

[6]  M. Modic,et al.  High-resolution MR imaging of sequestered lumbar intervertebral disks. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  T J Masaryk,et al.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[8]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Preliminary Evaluation of a Scheme for Grading the Gross Morphology of the Human Intervertebral Disc , 1990, Spine.

[9]  V. Haughton,et al.  Intervertebral disk: normal age-related changes in MR signal intensity. , 1990, Radiology.

[10]  M Kormano,et al.  Disc degeneration in magnetic resonance imaging. A comparative biochemical, histologic, and radiologic study in cadaver spines. , 1991, Spine.

[11]  A. Spira,et al.  Reliability of Interpretation of Plain Lumbar Spine Radiographs in Benign, Mechanical Low‐Back Pain , 1991, Spine.

[12]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging reflects the chemical changes of aging degeneration in the human intervertebral disk. , 1991, The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement.

[13]  M. Zlatkin,et al.  In vivo and ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of early disc degeneration with histopathologic correlation. , 1991, Spine.

[14]  J C Gore,et al.  Factors influencing contrast in fast spin-echo MR imaging. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  J Listerud,et al.  First principles of fast spin echo. , 1992, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[16]  J Listerud,et al.  Fast spin-echo imaging of the brain and spine. , 1993, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[17]  C. Boesch,et al.  Quantitative MR imaging of lumbar intervertebral disc and vertebral bodies: methodology, reproducibility, and preliminary results. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  J. Coste,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver variability in the interpretation of computed tomography of the lumbar spine. , 1994, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  L. Cook,et al.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities. A comparison of two nomenclatures. , 1995 .

[20]  L E Gibbons,et al.  Observer Variability in the Assessment of Disc Degeneration on Magnetic Resonance Images of the Lumbar and Thoracic Spine , 1995, Spine.

[21]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in Interpretation of Lumbar Disc Abnormalities: A Comparison of Two Nomenclatures , 1995, Spine.

[22]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Vacuum disc: frequency of high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images , 1998, Skeletal Radiology.

[23]  M. Zanetti,et al.  MR imaging of the lumbar spine: prevalence of intervertebral disk extrusion and sequestration, nerve root compression, end plate abnormalities, and osteoarthritis of the facet joints in asymptomatic volunteers. , 1998, Radiology.